Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 143–152 | Cite as

The incidence of unethical practices in marketing research: An empricial investigation

  • Ishmael P. Akaah
  • Edward A. Riordan


The authros examine from the perspective of marketing professionals the incidence of unethical research practices and the influence of organizational factors as determinants of the incidence of unethical research practices. The results indicate some degree of indicence of unethical research practices, particularly of those involving respondents. In addition, the results suggest four organizational variables— extent of ethical problems within the organization, top management actions on ethics, organizational role, and industry category—as determinants of the incidence of unethical research partices.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achenbaum, Alvin, A. 1985. “Can We Tolerate a Double Standard in Marketing Research?”Journal of Advertising Research 25 (June/July): RC3-RC7.Google Scholar
  2. Akaah, Ishmael P. and Edward A. Riordan. 1989. “Judgments of Marketing Professionals About Ethical Issues in Marketing Research: A Replication and Extension.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (February): 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, Scott J. and Terry S. Overton. 1977. “Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys.”Journal of Marketing Research 14 (August): 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartels, Robert. 1967. “A Model for Ethics in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 21 (January): 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumhart, Raymond C. 1961. “How Ethical are Businessment?”Harvard Business Review 39 (July–August): 6–19, 156–176.Google Scholar
  6. Bezilla, Robert, Joel B. Haynes, and Clifford Elliot. 1976. “Ethics in Marketing Research.”Business Horizons 19 (April): 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blankenship, A.B. 1964. “Some Aspects of Ethics in Marketing Research.”Journal of Marketing Research 1 (May): 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brenner, Steven N. and Earl A. Molander. 1977. “Is the Ethics of Business Changing?”Harvard Business Review 55 (January–February): 57–71.Google Scholar
  9. Coe, Ted L. and Barbara Coe. 1976. “Marketing Research: The Search for Professionalism.” InMarketing: 1776–1976 and Beyond, Kenneth L. Bernhardt, ed. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association, pp. 257–259.Google Scholar
  10. Coney, Kenneth A. and John H. Murphy. 1976. “Attitudes of Marketers Toward Ethical and Professional Marketing Research Practices.” In:Proceedings: Southern Marketing Association, Henry W. Nash and Donald P. Robin, eds., pp. 172–174.Google Scholar
  11. Crawford, Merle C. 1970. “Attitudes of Marketing Executives Toward Ethics in Marketing Research.”Journal of Marketing 34 (April): 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ethics Resource Center. 1979.Codes of Ethics in Corporations and Trade Associations and the Teaching of Ethics in Graduate Business Schools. Princeton, NJ: Opion, Research.Google Scholar
  13. Ferrell, O.C. and Larry G. Gresham. 1985. “A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision-Making in Marketing.”Journal of Marketing 49 (Summer): 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferrell, O.C. and Steven J. Skimer. 1988. “Ethical Behavior and Bureaucratic Structure in Marketing Research Organizations.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (February): 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fry, Fred L. and Robert J. Hock. 1976. “Who Claims Corporate Responsibility? The Biggest and the Worst.”Business and Society Review 18 (Summer): 62–65.Google Scholar
  16. Gallup, George, Jr. 1987. “Marketing Execs Split on Question of Regulations.”Marketing News 21 (January) 10.Google Scholar
  17. Gatignon, Hubert and Thomas S. Robertson. 1989. “Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Comparative Effects.”Journal of Marketing 53 (January): 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hunt, Shelby D. and Scott Vitell 1986. “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics.”Journal of Macromarketing (Spring) 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hunt, Shelby D., Lawrence B. Chonko, and James B. Wilcox. 1984. “Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers.”Journal of Marketing Research 21 (August): 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laczniak, Gene R. 1983. “Business Ethics: A Manager’s Primer.”Business 33 (January–March): 23–29.Google Scholar
  21. McDaniel, Stephen W., Perry Verille, and Charles S. Madden. 1985. “The Threats to Marketing Research: An Empirical Reappraisal.”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (February): 74–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGrown, K.L. 1979. “Ethical Issues Involving the Protection of Marketing Research Practioners and Respondents”. InProceedings of the American Institute of Decision Sciences. J. F. Hair, ed., pp. 195–197.Google Scholar
  23. Murphy, Patrick E. and Gene R. Laczniak. 1981. “Marketing Ethics: A Review with Implications for Managers, Educators and Researchs.” In:Review of Marketing, 1981 Ben M. Enis and Kenneth J. Roering, eds., Chicago: American Marketing Association, pp. 251–266.Google Scholar
  24. Schneider, Kenneth C. 1977. “Subject and Respondent Abuse in Marketing Research.”MSU Business Topics 25 (Spring): 13–19.Google Scholar
  25. Schneider, Kenneth C. and Cynthia K. Holm. 1982. “Deceptive Practices in Marketing Research: The Consumer’s Viewpoint.”California Management Review 24 (Spring): 89–96.Google Scholar
  26. Staw, Barry M. and Eugene Szwajkowski. 1975. “The Scarcity-Munificence Component of Organizational Environments and the Commission of Illegal Acts.”Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Taylor, Paul W. 1975.Principles of Ethics: An Introduction. Encion, CA: Dickensen.Google Scholar
  28. Trevino, Linda K. 1986. “Ethical Decision Makign in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model.”Academy of Management Review 11:601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tull, Donald S. and Del I. Hawkins. 1987.Marketing Research: Measurement and Methods. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Tybout, Alice M. and Gerald Zaltman. 1974. “Ethics in Marketing Research: Their Practical Relevance.”Journal of Marketing Research 11 (November): 357–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zey-Ferrell, Mary and O. C. Ferrell. 1982. “Role-Set Configuration and Opportunity as Predictors of Unethical Behavior in Organizations.”Human Relations 35: 567–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zikmund, Williams G. 1986.Exploring Marketing Research. Chicago, IL: Dryden.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Academy of Marketing Science 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ishmael P. Akaah
    • 1
  • Edward A. Riordan
    • 1
  1. 1.Wayne State UniversityWayneUSA

Personalised recommendations