The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 66, Issue 5, pp 791–798 | Cite as

Management of anorectal malformation in neonates

  • S. K. Chowdhary
  • Alka Gupta
  • R. Samujh
  • K. L. Narasimhan
  • K. L. N. Rao
Symposium: Neonatal Surgery
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

Anorectal malformations are one of the commonest anomalies in the new born. Major advances have been made in the last decade in operative techniques to reconstruct this abnormality. The final outcome in these babies is dependent on careful planning and operative intervention in the neonatal period. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the varied presentations of this anomaly, initial assessment and operative management with reference to our own experience.

Key words

Anorectal malformation Neonates 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kiesewetter WB. Imperforate anus.Surg Clin North America. 1956; 36:1531–36.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nixon HH. Imperforate Anus in British Surgical Practice and Surgical Progress. Butterworth and Co. Ltd. London 1961; 331–32.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peikarski DH, Stephens FD. The association and embryogenesis of tracheoeso-phageal and anorectal anomalies.Progress in Paediatric Surgery 1976; 9:63–75.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Quan L, Smith DW. The VATER association.J Pediatr 1973; 82:104–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barry JE, Auldist AW. The VATER association one end of a spectrum of anomalies.Am J Dis Child 1974; 128; 79–80.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beals RK, Rolfe B. Current concepts review — VATER association.J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71: 948–950.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stephens FD, Smit ED. Anorectal malformations in children: Associated anomalies. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago. 1971; 609–612.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Belman BA, King LR. Urinary tract abnormalities associated with imperforate anus.J Urol 1972; 108: 823–824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Narasimharao KL, Prasad GR, Mukhopadhyay B, Katariya S, Mitra SK, Pathak IC. Vesicoureteric reflux in neonates with anorectal anomalies.Brit J Urol 1983; 55: 268–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wangensteen OH, Rice CO. Imperforate anus: a method of determining the surgical approach.Ann Surg 1930; 92 : 77–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Narasimharao KL. Prone cross table lateral view: an alternative to the invertogram in imperforate anus.Am J Roengenol. 1983; 140:227–229.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Singh S, Pathak IC. Short colon associated with imperforate anus.Surgery 1972; 71: 781–786.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Narasimharao KL, Yadav K, Mitra SK, Pathak IC. Congenital short colon with imperforate anus (pouch colon syndrome).Ann Paediatr Surg. 1984; 3:159–167.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Donaldson SJ, Black TB, Reynolds M, Sherman OJ, Shkolnik A. Ultrasound of the distal pouch with imperforate anus.J Paediatr Surg 1989; 24: 465–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith ED. The identification and management of anorectal anomalies. The factors ensuring continence.Prog Paediatr Surg 1976; 9: 7–40.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stephens FD, Smith ED. Incidence, frequency of types, etiology in anorectal malformation in children. Chicago Year Book Medical Publishers, 1971; pp 160–171.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pena A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: result in the management of 332 cases of anorectal malformation.Paediatr Surg Int. 1988; 3:94–104.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pena A. Current management of anorectal malformations.S. Clin North America. 1992; 72:1392–1394.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swenson O, Donellan WL. Preservation of the puborectalis sling in imperforate anus repair.S Clin North America 1980; 47:197–198.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moore TC. Advantages of performing the sagittal anoplasty operation for imperforate anus at birth.J Paed Surg 1990; 25: 276–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pena A. Atlas of surgical management of anorectal malformation.Springer Verlag Publication 1989; 19–24.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pena A, De Vries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: Important technical considerations and new applications.J Pediatry Surg 1982; 17 : 796–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malone PS, Ransley PG, Kiely EM. Preliminary report: the antegrade continence enema.Lancet 1990; 336 : 1217–1218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Chowdhary
    • 1
  • Alka Gupta
    • 1
  • R. Samujh
    • 1
  • K. L. Narasimhan
    • 1
  • K. L. N. Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Pediatric SurgeryPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and ResearchChandigarh

Personalised recommendations