The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 66, Issue 5, pp 669–673 | Cite as

Intestinal helminth infections among school children in Visakhapatnam

  • I. Paul
  • G. Gnanamani
  • N. R. Nallam
Original Article


A study was carried out between 1993–1994 to determine the prevalence and intensity of intestinal helminth infections among 217 primary school children in Relliveedhi, a slum area in Visakhapatnam. The children were between 7 to 13 years of age and belonged to lower socioeconomic status. Stool samples collected were processed by modified formalin-ethyl acetate sedimentation technique to determine ova counts (EPG). One hundred and seventy seven children were infected with one or more of the intestinal parasites viz.Ascaris lumbhcoides, Trichuris trichiura and hookworm. The overall prevalence of infection was eighty two per cent.Ascaris lumbricoides was the most common infection with a prevalence of 75% followed byT. trichiura (66%) and hookworm (9%). All infected children received a single dose of albendazole (400 mg/child). Single stool samples were examined over a period of nine months to study reinfection dynamics.

Key words

Ascaris lumbricoides Trichuris Trichiura Hookworm Albendazole 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Elkins DB, Haswell-Elkins M. and Anderson RM. The epidemiology and control of intestinal helminths in the Pulicat Lake region of Southern India. 1 Study design and preand post-treatment observations onAscaris lumbricoides infection.Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg 1986; 80: 774–792.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stephenson LS, and Holland C. In:The Impact of Helminth Infections on Human Nutrition : Schistosomes and Soil-Transmitted Helminths (London: Taylor & Francis); 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elkins DB, Haswell-Elkins M and Anderson RM. The importance of host age and sex to patterns of reinfection withAscaris lumbricoides following mass anthelmintic treatment in a South Indian fishing community.Parasitology 1988; 96: 171–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Health Organization, 1987. Prevention and Control of Intestinal Parasitic Infection. WHO Technical Report Series No. 749 (Geveva: WHO).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crompton DWT. The prevalence of ascariasis.Parasitology Today 1988; 4: 162–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parekh VC, Naik PA, Udani PM, Shah PM. Parasitic infestations in pre-school children of urban and rural communities.Indian Pediatrics 1972; 10: 332–336.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nadkarni MG and Deodhar NS. Ascariasis in children at Aurangabad. A statistical analysis of age incidence.Indian Journal of Child health 1962; 2: 494.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lam S P. Soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Selangor, Malaysis.Med J Malaysia 1982; 37: 180–190.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gnanamani G, Tata Rao S, Madhavi R. Estimation of hookworm intensity by anthelminitic expulsion in primary school children in South India.Trans Roy Soc Trop Med 1993; 77: 432–438.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pamba HO, Bwibo NO, Chunge CN, Estanmble BBA. A study of the efficacy and safety of albendazole (Zentel) in the treatment of intestinal helminthiasis in Kenyan children less than 2 years of age.East Afr Med J 1989; 66: 197–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. Paul
    • 1
  • G. Gnanamani
    • 1
  • N. R. Nallam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyAndhra UniversityVisakhapatnam
  2. 2.West BengalIndia

Personalised recommendations