The Indian Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 70, Issue 6, pp 503–507 | Cite as

Controversies in chicken–pox immunization

Symposium on Cotroversies in Immunization-I

Abstract

Chicken–pox is one more newer vaccine in our armamentarium against infectious diseases. Due to its extremely contagious nature, varicella is experienced by almost every child or young adult in the world. Each year from 1990 to 1994, prior to availability of varicella vaccine, about 4 million cases of varicella occurred in the United States. Of these cases approximately 10,000 required hospitalization and 100 died. Although varicella is not commonly perceived as an important public health problem, the socioeconomic consequences in industrialized countries of a disease that affects practically every child and causes the carrier absence from work should not be underestimated. The varicella vaccines available in the market are safe and effective. A recent cost-benefit analysis in USA showed that routine chicken-pox vaccination is likely to save five times the investment. Even when only direct costs were considered, benefits almost balanced the costs. At present similar studies from developing countries are not available. The public health impact of varicella and zoster may be increasing in regions with high endemic rates of HIV infection. Varicella vaccine may be used either at an individual level to protect susceptible adolescents and adults, or at a population level, to cover all children as part of a national immunization programme. Vaccination of adolescents and adults will protect at-risk individuals, but will not have a significant impact on the epidemiology of the disease on a population basis. On the other hand, extensive use as a routine vaccine in children will have a significant impact on the epidemiology of the disease. If sustained high coverage can be achieved, the disease may virtually disappear. If only partial coverage can be obtained, the epidemiology may shift, leading to an increase in the number of cases in older children and adults. Hence, routine childhood varicella immunization programmes should emphasize high, sustained coverage. At present, this vaccine will have a lower priority in the National Immunization Schedule that does not have MMR and typhoid, which have a greater socioeconomic impact. Hence, at the present time WHO does not recommend the inclusion of varicella vaccination into the routine immunization programmes of developing countries.

Key words

Varicellac Immunization HIV infection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Takahashi M, Otsuka T, Okuno Yet al. Live vaccine used to prevent the spread of varicella in children in hospital.Lancet 1974, 2:1288–1290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Halloran ME, Cochi SL, Lieu TA, Wharton M, Fehrs L. Theoretical epidemiologic and morbidity effects of routine varicella immunization of preschool children in the United States.Am J Epidemiol 1994; 140(2): 81–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Enders Get al. Consequences of varicella and herpes zoster in pregnancy: prospective study of 1739 cases.Lancet 1994, 343: 1548–1551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lieu TAet al. Cost-effectiveness of a routine varicella vaccination programme for U.S. children.JAMA 1994; 271: 375–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vugia DJet al. Invasive group A streptococcal infections in children with varicella in Southern California.Pediatr Inject Dis J 1996; 15(2): 146–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Werner SB. Invasive group A streptococcal infections in children with varicella in Southern California.Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996; 15(2): 146–150.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    CDC. Prevention of Varicella. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1996; 45, (RR-11): 1–37.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watson BM, Laufer DS, Kuter BJet al. Safety and immunogenicity of combined live attenuated mumps, rubella and varicella vaccine (MMRHV) in healthy children.J Inject Dis 1996; 173:731–734.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Asano Y. Varicella vaccine. The Japanese experience.J Infect Dis 1996, 174 (Suppl 3) S310–313.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fairley CK, Miller E. Varicella-zoster virus epidemiology — a changing scene?J Infect Dis 1996, 174 (Suppl 3): S314–319.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferguson NM, Anderson RM, Garnett GP. Mass vaccination to control chickenpox: The influence of zoster.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:7231–7235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Izurieta HS, Stebel PM, Blake PA. Postlicensure Effectiveness of varicella vaccine during an outbreak in a child care center,JAMA 1997; 12; 278(18): 1495–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    CDC. Varicella-related deaths among adults – United States, 1997.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997; 16,46(19): 409–412.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    CDC. Outbreak of invasive group A streptococcus associated with varicella in a childcare center — Boston, Massachusetts, 1997.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1997; 10, 46(40): 944–948.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vessey SJR, Chan CY, Kuter BJ, Kuplan KMet al. Childhood vaccination against varicella; persistance of antibody, duration of protection and vaccine efficacy.J Peds 2001; 139:297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vazquez M, LaRussa PS, Gershon AA, Steinberg SPet al. The effectiveness of the varicella vaccine in clinical practice. NewEngl J Med 2001; 344:955–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wise RP, Salive ME, Braun MM, Mootery OTet al. Postlicensure safety surveillance for varicella vaccine.JAMA 2000; 284:1271–1279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Andre FE. Worldwide experience with the Ok-strain live varicella vaccine.Postgrad Med J 1985; 61 (Suppl 4): 113–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Just M, Berger R, Luescher D. Live varicella vaccine in healthy individuals.Postgrand Med J 1985; 61 (Suppl 4): 129–32.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ndumbe PM, Cradock-Watson JE, Heath RB, Levinaky RJ. Live varicella immunization in healthy non-immune nurses,Postgrad Med J 1985; 61 (Suppl 4): 133–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    White CJ, Kuter BJ, Ngai Aet al. Modified cases of chicken-pox after varicella vaccination correlation of protection with antibody response.Pediatr Infect Dis J 1992; 11:19–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arvin AM. Celi-mediated immunity to varicella-zoster vaccine.J Infect Dis 1992; 166(Suppl 1): S35–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parthasarathy A, Dutta AK, Bhave SY.Ref IAP Guidebook on Immunization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indraprastha Apollo Hospital & Max Health CareNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations