Do source and anonymity affect mail survey results?
- 140 Downloads
This study examines the effects of the methodological characteristics of research source and anonymity of response upon mail survey response behavior. Unique features of the study were that the survey sponsor was identified, and the population sampled was one that should have a certain amount of commitment to both the sponsor and the topic because of membership in the sponsoring organization.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Albaum, G., J. Hanson, and D. Tull. 1982. “The Effect of Questionnaire Format and Coding on Responses From Commercial Population Mail Surveys.” Paper presented at the National Meetings of American Institute for Decision Sciences.Google Scholar
- Allen, C. T. 1982. “Perspectives on Mail Survey Response Rates.” Paper presented at the American Marketing Association Conference on Marketing Theory.Google Scholar
- Childers, T. L., and S. J. Skinner. 1985. “Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Identification of Survey Respondents”.Journal of Marketing Research Society 27 (January) 39–53.Google Scholar
- Dillman, D. 1978Mail and Teleohone Surveys: The Total Design Method. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
- Erdos, P. and J. Regier. 1977. “Visible vs. Disguised Keying on Questionnaires”.Journal of Advertising Research 17 13–18.Google Scholar
- Hornback, R. 1971. “Toward a Theory of Involvement Propensity for Collective Behavior.”Sociological Forces 4 (Summer) 61–77.Google Scholar
- McDaniel, S. W. and C. P. Rao. 1980. “The Effects of Anonymity on Respondent Effort in Mailed Questionnaire Surveys.” Paper presented at the annual conference of the Academy of Marketing Science.Google Scholar
- Nitecki, D. 1975. “Effects of Sponsorship and Nonmonetary Incentive on Response Rate.”Journalism Quarterly 55 581–583.Google Scholar
- O’Connor, P. J., G. Sullivan and W. Jones. 1981. “An Evaluation of the Characteristics of Response Quality Induced by Follow-up Survey Methods.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
- Peterson, R. A. and R. Kerin. 1981. “The Quality of Self-Report Data: Review and Synthesis.”Annual Review of Marketing, B. Enis and K. Roering, (eds.), Chicago: American Marketing Association 5–20.Google Scholar
- Scott, C. 1961. “Research on Mail Surveys.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 124 143–205.Google Scholar