Short- and long-term effects of environmental urea on fecundity inDrosophila melanogaster
- 70 Downloads
Previous studies have shown that exposure to urea-supplemented food inhibited fecundity inDrosophila females, and that this inhibition was not expressed when females were given a choice between regular and urea-supplemented food as an oviposition substrate. We assayed fecundity, on both regular food and urea-supplemented food, at 5, 15 and 25 days post eclosion on females from ten laboratory populations ofDrosophila melanogaster. The females assayed came from one of two treatments; they were maintained as adults on either regular or urea-supplemented food. We found that exposure to urea-supplemented food inhibited fecundity, relative to the levels exhibited on regular food, regardless of whether the urea was present in the assay medium, or in the medium on which the flies were maintained over the course of the experiment, thereby suggesting that urea has both a long-term (possibly physiological) as well as a short-term (possibly behavioural) inhibitory effect on fecundity ofDrosophila females. We also tested and ruled out the hypothesis that prior yeasting could ameliorate the inhibitory effect of urea in the assay medium on fecundity, as this was a possible explanation of why flies given a choice between regular and urea-supplemented food did not exhibit a preference for regular food in a previous study.
KeywordsUrea larval crowding egg laying behaviour fecundity oviposition preference Drosophila melanogaste
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Joshi A1997 Laboratory studies of density-dependent selection: adaptations to crowding inDrosophila melanogaster;Curr. Sci. 72 555–561Google Scholar
- Mueller L D 1995 Adaptation and density-dependent natural selection; inGenetics of natural populations: the continuing importance’ of Tlzeodosius Dobzizansky (ed.) L Levine (New York: Columbia University Press) pp 101–124Google Scholar
- Rose M R, Nusbaum T J and Chippindale A K 1996 Laboratory evolution: the experimental wonderland and the Cheshire Cat syndrome; inAdaptation (eds) M R Rose and G V Lauder (San Diego: Academic Press) pp 221–241Google Scholar
- Sheeba V, Madhyastha N A A and Joshi A 1998 Oviposition preference for novel versus normal food resources in laboratory populations ofDrosophila melanogaster;J. Biosci. 23 93–100Google Scholar