Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 425–432 | Cite as

Development of novel protein refolding using simulated moving bed chromatography

Article

Abstract

In vitro protein refolding is still one of the baffles in both structural biology and development of new biopharmaceuticals, especially for large-scale production of valuable proteins that are overexpressed as inclusion bodies inEscherichia coli. A new continuous refolding method using four zone simulated moving bed process based on size exclusion mechanism was developed to overcome difficulties of inclusion body refolding. Protein refolding using size exclusion SMB enables us to obtain refolded protein continuously with high productivity, low consumption of refolding buffer, and high efficiency of size exclusion medium. Thermodynamics and kinetic parameters for SMB operation were estimated from the best-fit values by comparing the simulation and experimental chromatography results. The SMB operation condition was obtained from the triangle theory, and experimental results were in good agreement with the simulation results

Key words

Lysozyme Continuous Protein Refolding Size-exclusion Chromatography Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altamirano, M.M., Golbik, R., Zahn, R., Buckle, A.M. and Fersht, A. R., “Refolding Chromatography with Immobilized Mini-chaperones,”Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,94, 3576 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, W. L. and Wetlaufer, D. B., “The Folding Pathway of Reduced Lysozyme,”J. Biol. Chem., 251(10), 3147 (1976).Google Scholar
  3. Batas, B. and Chaudhuri, J. B., “Protein Refolding at High Concentration Using Size-exclusion Chromatography,”Biotechnol. Bioeng.,50, 16 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batas, B. and Chaudhuri, J.B., “Considerations of Sample Application and Elution During Size-exclusion Chromatography-based Protein Refolding,”J. Chromatogr. A,864, 229 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Batas, B., Jones, H.R. and Chaudhuri, J. B., “Studies of the Hydrodynamic Volume Changes that Occur During Refolding of Lysozyme Using Size-exclusion Chromatography,”J. Chromatogr. A,766, 109 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batas, B., Schiraldi, C. and Chaudhuri, J. B., “Inclusion Body Purification and Protein Refolding Using Microfiltration and Size Exclusion Chromatography,”J. Biotechnol.,68, 149 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bollag, D.M., Rozycki, M. D. and Edelstein, S. J.,Protein Methods, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York (1996).Google Scholar
  8. Broughton, D.B., “Molex: Case History of a Process,”Chem. Eng. Prog.,64, 60 (1968).Google Scholar
  9. Broughton, D. B., Neuzil, R.W., Pharis, J. M. and Brearley, C. S., “The Parex Process for Recovering Paraxylene,”Chem. Eng. Prog.,66, 70 (1970).Google Scholar
  10. Daniel, J. S., Bachmann, A., Hofrichter, J., Hodgson, K. O., Doniach, S. and Kiefhaber, T., “Characterization of Transient Intermediates in Lysozyme Folding with Time-resolved Small-angle X-ray Scattering,”J. Mol. Biol.,288, 489 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elwell, M. and Schellman, J., “Phage T4 Lysozyme Physical Properties and Reversible Unfolding,”Biochimi. Biophysi. Act.(BBA)-Protein Structure, 359(1), 351 (1974).Google Scholar
  12. Gao, Y.-G., Guan, Y.-X., Yao, S.-J. and Cho, M.-G., “Refolding of Lysozyme at High Concentration in Batch and Fed-batch Operation,”Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(5), 871 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geng, X. and Chang, X., “High-performance Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography as a Tool for Protein Refolding,”J. Chromatogr. A,599, 185 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gu, Z., Su, Z. and Janson, J.-C., “Urea Gradient Size-exclusion Chromatography Enhanced the Yield of Lysozyme Refolding,”J. Chromatogr. A,918, 311 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobson, J.M., Frenz, J. H. and Horvath, C., “Measurement of Competitive Adsorption Isotherms by Frontal Chromatography,”Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,26, 43 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jungbauer, A., Kaar, W. and Schegl, R., “Folding and Refolding of Proteins in Chromatic Beds,”Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.,15, 487 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jupke, A., Epping, A. and Schnidt-Traub, H., “Optimal Design of Batch and Simulated Moving Bed Chromatographic Separation Precesses,”J. Chromatogr. A,944, 93 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kotlarski, N., Oneill, B. K., Francis, G.L. and Middelberg, A. P. J., “Optimal Reactor Selection for Refolding Monomeric Protein,”AIChE J., 43(8), 2123 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lanckriet, H. and Middelberg, A. P. J., “Continuous Chromatographic Protein Refolding,”J. Chromatogr. A,1022, 103 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, C.T., Mackley, M.R., Stonestreet, P. and Middelberg, A. P. J., “Protein Refolding in an Oscillatory Flow Reactor,”Biotechnol. Lett.,23, 1899 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ma, Z. and Wang, N.-H. L., “Standing Wave Analysis of SMB Chromatography: Linear Systems,”AIChE J.,43, 488 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mazzotti, M., Storti, G. and Morbidelli, M., “Optimal Operation of Simulated Moving Bed Units for Nonlinear Chromatographic Separations,”J. Chromatogr. A,769, 3 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Middelberg, A. P. J., “The Influence of Protein Refolding Strategy on Cost for Competing Reactions,”Biochem. Eng. J., 61(1), 41 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pace, C. N., “Determination and Analysis of Urea and Guanidine Hydrochloride Denaturation Curves,”Meth. Enzymol.,131, 266 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pais, L. S., Loureiro, J.M. and Rodrigues, A. E., “Chiral Separation by SMB Chromatography,”Sep. Purif. Technol.,20, 67 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rozema, D. and Gellman, S.H., “Artificial Chaperones: Protein Refolding via Sequential Use of Detergent and Cyclodextrin,”J. Am. Chem. Soc.,117, 2373 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saxena, V. P. and Wetlaufer, D. B., “Formation of Three Dimensional Structure in Proteins. I. Rapid Nonenzymic Reactivation of Reduced Lysozyme,”Biochem.,9, 5015 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shugar, D., “The Measurement of Lysozyme Activity and the Ultraviolet Inactivation of Lysozyme,”Biochim. Biophys. Acta,8, 302 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Timasheff, S. N. and Xie, G., “Preferential Interactions of Urea with Lysozyme and Their Linkage to Protein Denatureation,”Biophys. Chem.,105, 421 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Werner, M. H., Clore, G. M., Gronenborn, A. M., Kondoh, A. and Fisher, R. J., “Refolding Protein by Gel Filtration Chromatography,”FEBS Lett.,345, 125 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wildegger, G., Kiefhaber, T., “Three State Model for Lysozyme Folding Triangular Folding Mechanism with an Energetically Trapped Intermediate,”J. Mol. Biol.,279, 294 (1994).Google Scholar
  32. Wu, D.-J., Xie, Y., Ma, Z. and Wang, N.-H. L., “Design of Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography for Amino Acid Separation,”Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.,37, 4023 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang, Y. J., Lee, C. H. and Koo, Y.M., “Separation of Amino Acids by Simulated Moving Bed Using Competitive Langmuir Isotherm,”Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng.,9, 331 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang, Z., Mazzotti, M. and Morbidelli, M., “Continuous Chromatographic Processes with a Small Number of Columns: Comparison of Simulated Moving Bed with Varicol, PowerFeed, and ModiCon,”Korean J. Chem. Eng., 21(2), 454 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Institute of Chemical Engineering 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological EngineeringInha UniversityIncheonKorea
  2. 2.ERC for Advanced Bioseparation TechnologyInha UniversityIncheonKorea

Personalised recommendations