Skip to main content
Log in

Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the elderly. Age is not always an adverse prognostic factor

Linfomas no Hodgkin en el anciano. La edad no es siempre un factor de mal pronóstico

  • Originales
  • Published:
Revista de Oncología Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A retrospective study analyzing non-Hodgkin's lym-phoma (NHL) diagnosed in patients in our center above 65 years of age between the years 1977–1991 is reported. Histological classification has been completed following the criteria of the Working Formulation. Of 521 patients, 427 were candidates for evaluation. Those above 65 years of age comprised the subject of our study, with a total of 95 cases.

Population: 43/52 male/female, 47 intermediate-grade NHL, 38 low-grade NHL, Ann Arbor stages I–II/III–IV 36/59, performance status (PS) 0-1/2-3 39/56, B symptoms yes/no 47/48, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) normal/high 33/62, albumin normal/low 75/20, Cu normal/high 44/37 (the rest not available), B2 microglobuline normal/high 17/11 (the rest not available), tumor burden (MD Anderson) high/intermediate/low 41/28/26.

The median range of cause specific survival was 30 months (50 for the low-grade NHL, 17 for the intermediate-grade). Significant prognostic factors: Histological grade (low versus high and intermediate), PS 0/1 versus 2/3, presence versus absence of B symptoms, normal versus high LDH, tumor burden (low versus high and intermediate). There is no significant statistical difference between elderly patients and young patients with a poor PS, phases I and IV, low albumin level and high and low tumor burden. Age as an adverse prognostic factor is evident in patients with a strong PS, phases II and III, normal albumin and intermediate tumor burden.

The characteristics and prognostic factors of elderly patients with NHL are similar to those of the young. Age does not always function as an independent prognostic factor; age has no effect on groups with favorable or unfavorable prognostic factors and it is in the intermediate prognostic groups in which age plays a part in survival.

Resumen

Hemos analizado de forma retrospectiva los pacientes diagnosticados de linfoma no Hodgkin (LNH) mayores de 65 años en nuestra institución entre los años 1977–1991. La clasificación histológica empleada sigue los criterios de laWorking Formulation. De 521 patients, 427 fueron candidatos para la revisión; los 95 mayores de 65 años son el objeto de nuestro estudio. Población: 43/52 hombres/mujeres, 47 LNH de grado intermedio, 38 LNH de bajo grado, estadios de Ann Arbor I–II/III–IV 36/59, PS 0-1/2-3 39/56, síntomas B si/no 47/48, LDH normal/elevada 33/62, albúmina normal/baja 75/20, cobre normal/elevado 44/37 (no disponible en el resto), B2 microglobulina normal/elevada 17/11 (no disponible en el resto), masa tumoral del MD Anderson: Alta/intermedia/ baja 4.1/28/26. La mediana de superviencia causa-específica fue de 30 meses (50 meses en los LNH de bajo grado y 17 meses en los de grado intermedio). Factores pronósticos significativos fueron: grado histológico (bajo frente a intermedio y alto), PS 0/1 frente 2/3, presencia frente a ausencia de síntomas B, LDH normal frente a elevada, carga tumoral del MD Anderson baja frente a alta e intermedia. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los pacientes ancianos y jóvenes con pobre PS, estadios I y IV, albúmina baja y cargas tumorales alta y baja. La edad empeora el pronóstico de los pacientes con PS intermedios, estadios II y III, albúmina normal y carga tumoral intermedia.

Las características clínicas y los factores pronósticos de los pacientes ancianos con LNH son similares a las de los pacientes jóvenes. La edad no se comporta siempre como un factor pronóstico independiente. En los grupos con otros factores de buen o mal pronótico la influencia de la edad se diluye y ésta se manifiesta en los grupos con pronóstico intermedio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Connors JM, O'Reilly SE.Treatment considerations in the elderly patient with lymphoma.Hem Oncol Clin North Am 1997;5:949–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tirelli BU, Errante D, Van Glabbeke, et al. CHOP is the standard regimen in patients ≥70 years of age with intermediate-grade and high-grade non Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of cancer lympho-ma cooperative study group.J Clin Oncol 1998;1:27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tirelli U, Zagonel V, Serraino D, et al. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 157 patients aged 70 years of older. A retrospective European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) lymphoma group study.J Clin Oncol 1988;6:1708–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vose JM, Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD, et al. The importance of age in survival of patients treated with chemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.J Clin Oncol 1988;6:1858–844.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shipp MA, Harrington DP, Anderson JR, et al. A predictive model for aggressive NHL: the international non-Hodgkin's lymphoma prognostic factors project.N Engl J Med 1993;329:987–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dixon DO, Neilan B, Jones SE, et al. Effect of age on therapeutic outcome in advanced diffuse histiocytic lym-phoma: the Southwest Oncology Group Experience.J Clin Oncol 1986;4:295–305.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. The non-Hodgkin's lymphoma classification project.Effect of age on the caracteristics and clinical behavior of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients.Ann Oncol 1997;8:973–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Repetto L, Vercelli M, Simoni A, et al. Comorbid conditions among elderly cancer patients.Ann Oncol 1994;5(Suppl 8):58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jagannanth S, Velasquez WS, Tucker SL, et al. Tumor burden assessment and its implications for a prognostic model in advanced diffuse large cell lymphoma.J Clin Oncol 1986;4:859–65.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan EL, Meier P.Non parametric estimation from incomplete observations.J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cox DR.Regression models and life-tables (with discussion).JR Stat Soc 1972;B34:187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carbone A, Volpe R, Gloghini A, et al. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the elderly.Cancer 1990;66:1991–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tirelli U, Zagonel V, Sorio R, et al. Mitoxantrone in combination with etoposide and prednimustine in patients older than 70 years with unfavorauble non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a prospective study in 52 patients.Semin Oncol 1994;31:13–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Balducci L, Parker M, Sexton W, Tantranond P.Pharmacology of antineoplastic agents in the elderly patients.Semin Oncol 1989;16:76–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ballester OF, Moscinsky L, Spiers A, et al. Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the older person: a review.J Am Geriath Soc 1993;41:1245–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Armitage JO.Treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.N Engl J Med 1993;528:1023–30.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Armitage JO, Potter JF.Aggressive chemotherapy for diffuse histiocytic lymphoma in the elderly: increased complications of advancing age.J Am Geriatr Soc 1984;32:269–273.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sonneveld P, Michiels JJ.Full dose chemotherapy in elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a feasibility study using a mitoxantrone containing regimen.Br J Cancer 1990;62:105–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. O'Really SE, Klimo P, Conncors JM, et al. Low dose ACOP-B and VABE: weekly chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced stage diffuse large cell lymphoma.J Clin Oncol 1991;9:741–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Coiffier B, Biron P, Bastion Y, et al. Elderly lymphoma patients have a long survival if treated of curative intent. A study froma the GELA on 453 patients older than 69 years [abstract 1279].Prom Am Soc Clin Oncol 1996;15:417.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gómez H, Hidalgo M, Casanova L, et al. Risk factors for treatment-related death in elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a multivariate analysis.J Clin Oncol 1998;16:2065–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gómez H, Santillana S, Casanova L, et al. Dose intensity chemotherapy improves disease free survival in elderly aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with conventional CHOP.Eur J Cancer 1995;31A(Suppl. 5):168–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bastion Y, Bosly A, Gisselbrecht C, et al. A randomized double-blind phase III study of filgastrim vs placebo during intensive induction chemotherapy in 55 to 69 year old patients with poor prognosis aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Blood 1993;82(Suppl 1):143–50.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gómez H, Colomer R.Tratatamiento del linfoma en el anciano.Med Clin 1998;110:574–5.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Maartense E, Hermans J, Kluin Nelemans JC, et al. Elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: population based results in the Netherlands.Ann Oncol 1998;9:1219–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huerta, Á.S., Gómez-Codina, J., Borgoñón, M.P. et al. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the elderly. Age is not always an adverse prognostic factor. Rev Oncol 4, 436–442 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02719121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02719121

Key words

Palabras clave

Navigation