Journal of Genetics

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 49–58 | Cite as

William Bateson: A biologist ahead of his time

  • Patrick Bateson


William Bateson coined the term genetics and, more than anybody else, championed the principles of heredity discovered by Gregor Mendel. Nevertheless, his reputation is soured by the positions he took about the discontinuities in inheritance that might precede formation of a new species and by his reluctance to accept, in its fullblooded form, the view of chromosomes as the controllers of individual development. Growing evidence suggests that both of these positions have been vindicated. New species are now thought to arise as the result of genetic interactions, chromosomal rearrangements, or both, that render hybrids less viable or sterile. Chromosomes are the sites of genes but genes move between chromosomes much more readily than had been previously believed and chromosomes are not causal in individual development. Development, like speciation, requires an understanding of the interactions between genes and the interplay between the individual and its environment.


Evolution Committee Chromosome Theory Homogentisic Acid Kallmann Syndrome Alkaptonuria 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arthur W. 2000 The concept of developmental reprogramming and the quest for an inclusive theory of evolutionary mechanisms.Evol. Dev. 2, 49–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson B. 1928William Bateson: naturalist. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Bateson P. 1984 Sudden changes in ontogeny and phylogeny. InBehavior; evolution and integrative levels (ed. G. Greenberg and E. Tobach), pp. 155–166. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, USA.Google Scholar
  4. Bateson P. and Martin P. 1999Design for a life: how behaviour develops. Cape, London.Google Scholar
  5. Bateson W. 1894Materials for the study of variation: treated with especial regard to discontinuity in the origin of species. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  6. Bateson W. 1902Mendel’s principles of heredity: a defence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Bateson W. 1909 Heredity and variation in modern lights. InDarwin and modern science (ed. A. C. Seward), pp. 85–101. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Bateson W. 1913Problems of genetics. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  9. Bateson W. 1926 Segregation.J. Genet. 16, 201–235.Google Scholar
  10. Bearn A. G. 1993Archibald Garrod and the individuality of man. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Bock G. R. and Goode J. A. E. (ed.) 1998The limits of reductionism in biology (Novartis Foundation Symposium 213). Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  12. Bowler P. J. 1983The eclipse of Darwinism. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  13. Brenner S. 2001My life in science. BioMed Central, London.Google Scholar
  14. Brooks W. K. 1883The laws of heredity: a study of the cause of variation and the origin of living organisms. Murphy, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  15. Burkhardt F. 2001 Darwin and the Copley Medal. InThe correspondence of Charles Darwin. Vol 12, 1864 (ed. F. Burkhardt, D. M. Porter, S. A. Dean, P. S. White, S. Wilmot, S. Evans and A. M. Pearn), pp. 509–527. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Cock A. G. 1973 William Bateson, Mendelism and biometry.J. Hist. Biol. 6, 1–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coleman W. 1970 Bateson and chromosomes: conservative thought in science.Centaurus 15, 228–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crowther J. G. 1952British scientists of the twentieth century. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  19. Dobzhansky T. 1937Genetics and origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Dover D. 2000Dear Mr Darwin. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
  21. Eldredge N. 1995Reinventing Darwin. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
  22. Fisher R. A. 1930The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Forsdyke D. R. 2001The origin of species revisited. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Kingston and Montreal.Google Scholar
  24. Galton F. 1892Hereditary genius: an inquiry into its laws and consequences, 2nd edition. Watts, London.Google Scholar
  25. Galton F. 1897 The average contribution of each of several ancestors to the total heritage of the offspring.Proc. R. Soc. London 61, 401–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garrod A. E. 1902 The incidence of alkaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality.The Lancet 13 December, 1616–1620.Google Scholar
  27. Goldschmidt R. 1940The material basis of evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  28. Gould S. J. 2002The structure of evolutionary theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. Henig R. M. 2000A monk and two peas: the story of Gregor Mendel and the discovery of genetics. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London.Google Scholar
  30. King M. 1993Species evolution: the role of chromosome change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. Lipset D. 1980Gregory Bateson: the legacy of a scientist. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  32. Mayr E. 1942Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Mayr E. 1982The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution and inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. Muller H. J. 1940 Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics. InThe new systematics (ed. J. S. Huxley), pp. 125–268. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  35. Olby R. 1987 William Bateson’s introduction of Mendelism to England: a reassessment.Br. J. Hist. Sci. 20, 399–420.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Orr H. A. 1997 Haldane’s Rule.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Orr H. A. and Presgraves D. C. 2000 Speciation by postzygotic isolation: forces, genes and molecules.BioEssays 22, 1085–1094.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oyama S., Griffiths P. E. and Gray R. D. (ed.) 2001Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  39. Pearson K. 1898 Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. On the Law of Ancestral Heredity.Proc. R. Soc. London 62, 386–412.Google Scholar
  40. Pfaff D. W. 1997 Hormones, genes, and behavior.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14213–14216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Provine W. B. 1971The origins of theoretical population genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  42. Punnett R. C. 1950 Early days of genetics.Heredity 4, 1–10.Google Scholar
  43. Ridley M. 1996Evolution, 2nd edition. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Romanes G. J. 1886 Physiological selection: an additional suggestion on the origin of species.J. Linn. Soc. (Zool.) 19, 337–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Royal Society. Reports to the Evolution Committee 1902Report 1. Experiments undertaken by W. Bateson, FRS, and Miss E. R. Saunders. Harrison & Sons, London.Google Scholar
  46. Schrödinger E. 1944What is life? The physical aspect of the living cell. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  47. Tudge C. 2000In Mendel’s footnotes. Cape, London.Google Scholar
  48. Wilson E. O. 1976 Author’s reply to multiple review of ‘Sociobiology’.Anim. Behav. 24, 716–718.Google Scholar
  49. Wright S. 1930 Evolution in Mendelian populations.Genetics 16, 97–159.Google Scholar
  50. Yule G. U. 1902 Mendel’s laws and their probable relations to intra-racial heredity.New Phytol. 1, 193–207, 222–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sub-Department of Animal BehaviourUniversity of CambridgeMadingleyUK

Personalised recommendations