Advertisement

Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 241–255 | Cite as

Additional members of the local group of galaxies and quantized redshifts within the two nearest groups

  • Halton Arp
Article

Abstract

Galaxies of redshiftz ≲ 1000 km s−1 are investigated. In the South Galactic Hemisphere there are two large concentrations of these galaxies. One is in the direction of the centre of the Local Group, roughly aligned with M 31 and M 33. The other concentration is centred almost 80 degrees away on the sky and involves the next nearest galaxies to the Local Group, NGC 55, NGC 300 and NGC 253.

The large scale and isolation of these concentrations, and the continuity of their redshifts require that they are all galaxies at the same, relatively close distance of the brightest group members. The fainter members of the group have higher redshifts, mimicking to some extent a Hubble relation. But if they are all at the same average distance the higher redshifts must be due to a cause other than velocity.

The redshifts of the galaxies in the central areas of these groups all obey a quantization interval of δcz0 = 72.4 kms−1. This is the same quantization found by William Tifft, and later by others, in all physical groups and pairs which have been tested. The quantization discovered here, however, extends over a larger interval in redshift than heretofore encountered.

The majority of redshifts used in the present analysis are accurate to ± 8 km s−1. The deviation of those redshifts from multiples of 72.4 km s-1 averages ±8.2 km s−1. The astonishing result, however, is that for those redshifts which are known more accurately, the deviation from modulo 72.4 drops to a value between 3 and 4 km s−1! The amount of relative velocity allowed these galaxies is therefore implied to be less than this extremely small value.

Key words

redshifts quantization−galaxies Local Group−galaxies Sculptor Group 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arp, H. 1964,Astrophys. J.,139, 1045.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Arp, H. 1976, inIAU Coll. 37: L’Evolution des Galaxies et ses Implications Cosmologique, Eds C. Balkowski & B. E. Westerlund, No. 263, C. N. R. S., Paris, p. 377.Google Scholar
  3. Arp, H. 1982a,Astrophys. J.,256, 54.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Arp, H. 1986a,Astr. Astrophys.,156, 207.ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Arp,H. 1986b, MPA 236.Google Scholar
  6. Arp, H. 1986c, in IAU Symp. 124:Observational Cosmology, Eds A. Hewitt, G. Burbidge & Li Zhi Fang, D. Reidel, Dordrecht; MPA 265.Google Scholar
  7. Arp, H. 1987,Quasars, Redshifts and Controversies, Interstellar Media, California.Google Scholar
  8. Arp, H., Sulentic, J. W. 1985,Astrophys. J.,291, 88.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Ford, H. C., Jacoby, G., Jenner, D. C. 1977,Astrophys. J.,213, 318.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Huchra, J. P., Geller, M. J. 1982,Astrophys. J.,257, 423.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Jaakkola, T., Moles, M. 1976,Astr. Astrophys.,53, 389.ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Sandage, A. R. 1984,Astr. J.,89, 621.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Sandage, A. R., Tamrnan, G. A. 1981,A Revised Shapely-Ames Catalog of Bright Galaxies, Carnegie Institution, Washington.Google Scholar
  14. Sulentic, J. W. 1984,Astrophys. J.,286, 442.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Tamman, G. A., Sandage, A., Yahil, A. 1980,Phys. Scripta,21, 630.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Tifft, W. G. 1972,Astrophys. J.,175, 613.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Tifft, W. G. 1976,Astrophys. X,206, 38.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Tifft, W. G. 1977,Astrophys. J.,211, 31.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Tifft, W. G. 1980,Astrophys, J.,236, 70.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Tifft, W. G., Cocke, J. 1984,Astrophys. J.,287, 492.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Halton Arp
    • 1
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Instiut für Physik und Astrophysik, Institut für AstrophysikGarching bei MünchenFRG

Personalised recommendations