Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 119–127

Language from a biological perspective

  • Mohinish Shukla
Article

Abstract

The faculty of language is unique to the human species. This implies that there are human-specific biological changes that lie at the basis of human language. However, it is not clear what the nature of such changes are, and how they could be shaped by evolution. In this paper, emphasis is laid on describing language in a Chomskyan manner, as a mental object. This serves as a standpoint to speculate about the biological basis of the emergence and evolution of language.

Keywords

Communication cortex evolution language minimalism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson S and Lightfoot D 2002The language organ: Linguistics as cognitive physiology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  2. Angelucci A, Clasca F and Sur M 1998 Brainstem inputs to the ferret medial geniculate nucleus and the effect of early deafferentation on novel retinal projections to the auditory thalamus;J. Comp. Neurol. 400 417–439PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker M 2002The atoms of language: The mind’s hidden rules of grammar (New York: Basic Books)Google Scholar
  4. Bertoncini J, Bijeljac-Babic R, Jusczyk P, Kennedy L and Mehler J 1988 An investigation of young infants’ perceptual representations of speech sounds;J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 117 21–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickerton D 1984 The language bioprogram hypothesis;Behav. Brain Sci. 7 173–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickerton D 1990Language and species (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
  7. Bickerton D 1999 How to acquire language without positive evidence: What acqisitionists can learn from Creoles; inLanguage creation and language change: Creolization diachrony and development (ed.) De Graff M (Cambridge: MIT Press) pp 49–74Google Scholar
  8. Bishop K, Goudreau G and O’Leary D 2000 Regulation of area identity in the mammalian neocortex by Emx2 and Pax6;Science 288 344–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calabretta R, Nolfi S, Parisi D and Wagner G 1998a Emergence of functional modularity in robots; inFrom animals to animates 5 (eds) R Pfeifer, B Blumberg, J-A Meyer and S Wilson (Cambridge: MIT Press) pp. 497–504Google Scholar
  10. Calabretta R, Nolfi S, Parisi D and Wagner G 1998bA case study of the evolution of modularity: Towards a bridge between evolutionary biology, artificial life, neuro- and cognitive science (Cambridge: MIT Press)Google Scholar
  11. Calabretta R, Nolfi S, Parisi D and Wagner G 2000 Duplication of modules facilitates the evolution of functional specialization;Artificial Life 6 69–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calabretta R and Parisi D 2004 Evolutionary connectionism and mind/brain modularity; (eds) inModularity understanding the development and evolution of complex natural systems (eds) W Callabaut and D Raskin-Gutman (Cambridge: MIT Press) (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Calvin W and Bickerton D 2000Lingua ex machina: Reconciling Darwin and Chomsky with the human brain (Cambridge: MIT Press)Google Scholar
  14. Catania K and Kaas J 1995 Organization of the somatosensory cortex of the star-nosed mole;J. Comp. Neurol. 351 549–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chomsky N 1970 Remarks on nominalization; inReadings in English transformational grammar (eds) R Jacobs and P Rosenbaum (Waltham: Ginn) pp 184–221Google Scholar
  16. Chomsky N 1981aLectures on government and binding (Dordrecht: Foris)Google Scholar
  17. Chomsky N 1981b Principles and parameters in syntactic theory; inExplanation in linguistics: The logical problem of language acquisition (eds) N Hornstein and D Lightfoot (London, New York: Longman) pp 32–75Google Scholar
  18. Chomsky N 1995The minimalist program (current studies in linguistics) (Cambridge: The MIT Press)Google Scholar
  19. Chomsky N 2000New horizons in the study of language and mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  20. Dryer M 1992 The Greenbergian word order correlations;Language 68 81–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Enard W, Przeworski M, Fisher S, Lai C, Wiebe V, Kitano T, Monaco A and Paabo S 2002 Molecular evolution of FOXP2 a gene involved in speech and language;Nature (London) 418 869–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fisher S, Lai C and Monaco A 2003 Deciphering the genetic basis of speech and language disorders;Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 26 57–80PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fisher S, Vargha-Khadem F, Watkins K, Monaco A and Pembrey M 1998 Localisation of a gene implicated in a severe speech and language disorder;Nat. Genet. 18 168–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fitch W 2000 The evolution of speech: a comparative review;Trends Cogn. Sci. 4 258–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fodor J 1975Language of thought (Scranton: Crowell)Google Scholar
  26. Fodor J and Pylyshyn Z 1988 Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis;Cognition 28 3–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gibson G 1999 Insect evolution: Redesigning the fruitfly;Curr. Biol. 9 R86-R89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gleitman L and Wanner E 1982 Language acquisition: The state of the state of the art; inLanguage acquisition: The state of the art (eds) L Gleitman and E Wanner (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 3–48Google Scholar
  29. Goldin-Meadow S and Mylander C 1990 Beyond the input given: The child’s role in the acquisition of language;Language 66 323–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gray R and Atkinson Q 2003 Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin;Nature (London) 426 435–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gu Z, Rifkin S, White K and Li W 2004 Duplicate genes increase gene expression diversity within and between species;Nat. Genet. 36 577–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gu Z, Steinmetz L, Gu X, Scharfe C, Davis R and Li W 2003 Role of duplicate genes in genetic robustness against null mutations;Nature (London) 421 63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hall D and Waxman S 2004Weaving a lexicon (Cambridge: The MIT Press)Google Scholar
  34. Hauser M, Chomsky N and Fitch W 2002 The faculty of language: what is it, who has it and how did it evolve?;Science 298 1569–1579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hubel D and Wiesel T 1968 Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex;J. Physiol. (London) 195 215–243Google Scholar
  36. Jackendoff R 1977X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure (Cambridge: MIT Press)Google Scholar
  37. Kaas J 1997 Topographic maps are fundamental to sensory processing;Brain Res. Bull. 44 107–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kondrashov F, Rogozin I, Wolf Y and Koonin E 2002 Selection in the evolution of gene duplications;Genome Biol. 3 RESEARCH0008Google Scholar
  39. Krubitzer L and Huffman K 2000 Arealization of the neocortex in mammals: genetic and epigenetic contributions to the phenotype;Brain Behav. Evol. 55 322–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krubitzer L and Kahn D 2003 Nature versus nurture revisited: an old idea with a new twist;Prog. Neurobiol. 70 33–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lai C, Fisher S, Hurst J, Vargha-Khadem F and Monaco A 2001 A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder;Nature (London) 413 519–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lieberman P, Klatt D and Wilson W 1969 Vocal tract limitations on the vowel repertoires of rhesus monkey and other nonhuman primates;Science 164 1185–1187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Livingstone M and Hubel D 1988 Segregation of form, color, movement and depth: anatomy physiology and perception.Science 240 740–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marcus G 2004The birth of the mind (New York: Basic Books)Google Scholar
  45. Marcus G and Fisher S 2003 FOXP2 in focus: what can genes tell us about speech and language?;Trends Cogn. Sci. 7 257–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McGinnis W and Krumlauf R 1992 Homebox genes and axial patterning;Cell 68 283–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Melchner L von, Pallas S and Sur M 2000 Visual behaviour mediated by retinal projections directed to the auditory pathway;Nature (London) 404 871–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Merzenich M, Kaas J, Sur M and Lin C 1978 Double representation of the body surface within cytoarchitectonic areas 3b and 1 in “SI” in the owl monkey(Aotus trivirgatus);J. Comp. Neurol. 181 41–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Morgan J L and Demuth K (eds) 1996Signal to syntax (Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum)Google Scholar
  50. Nazzi T, Bertoncini J and Mehler J 1998 Language discrimination by newborns: toward an understanding of the role of rhythm;J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform 24 756–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nespor M, Guasti M T and Christophe A 1996 Selecting word order: the rhythmic activation principle; inInterfaces in phonology (ed.) U Kleinhenz (Berlin: Akademie Verlag) pp 1–26Google Scholar
  52. Ohno S 1970Evolution by gene duplication (Berlin: Springer-Verlag)Google Scholar
  53. Pavlopoulos A and Averof M 2002 Developmental evolution: Hox proteins ring the changes;Curr. Biol. 12 R291-R293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pinker S and Bloom P 1990 Natural language and natural selection;Behav. Brain Sci. 13 707–784Google Scholar
  55. Pinker S and Jackendoff R 2005 What’s special about the human language faculty?;Cognition (in press)Google Scholar
  56. Ramus F, Nespor M and Mehler J 2000 Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal;Cognition 75 AD3-AD30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Recanzone G 2000 Cerebral cortical plasticity: Perception and skill acquisition; inThe new cognitive neurosciences (ed.) M Gazzaniga (Cambridge: MIT Press) pp 237–247Google Scholar
  58. Sharma J, Angelucci A and Sur M 2000 Induction of visual orientation modules in auditory cortex;Nature (London) 404 841–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sidow A 1996 Gen(om)e duplications in the evolution of early vertebrates;Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 6 715–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sur M and Leamey C 2001 Development and plasticity of cortical areas and networks;Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2 251–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Szathmáry E and Smith J 1995 The major evolutionary transitions;Nature (London) 374 227–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohinish Shukla
    • 1
  1. 1.Cognitive Neuroscience SectorInternational School for Advanced Studies (SISSA)TriesteItaly

Personalised recommendations