Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 31–39

The return of the whole organism

  • Patrick Bateson
Article

Abstract

The long trend towards analysis at lower and lower levels is starting to reverse. The new integrative studies must make use of the resources uncovered by molecular biology but should also use the characteristics of whole organisms to measure the outcomes of developmental processes. Two examples are given of how movement between levels of analysis is being used with increasing power and promise. The first is the study of behavioural imprinting in birds where many of the molecular and neural mechanisms involved have been uncovered and are now being integrated to explain the behaviour of the whole animal. The second is the triggering during sensitive periods in early life by environmental events of one of several alternative modes of development leading to different phenotypes. A renewed focus on the whole organism is also starting to change the face of evolutionary biology. The decision-making and adaptability of the organism is recognized an important driver of evolution and is increasingly seen as an alternative to the gene-focused views.

Keywords

Alternative phenotypes behavioural biology behavioural imprinting developmental plasticity organic selection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akam M, Holland P, Ingham P and Wray G 1994The evolution of developmental mechanisms (Cambridge: Company of Biologists)Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin J M 1896 A new factor in evolution;Am. Nat. 30 441–451, 536–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker D J P 1998Mothers, babies and health in later life (Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone)Google Scholar
  4. Bateson P 1981 Discontinuities in development and changes in the organization of play in cats; inBehavioral development (eds) K Immelmann, G W Barlow, L Petrinovich and M Main (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 28l-295Google Scholar
  5. Bateson P 1988 The active role of behaviour in evolution; inProcess and metaphors in evolution (eds) M-W Ho and S Fox (Chichester: Wiley) pp 191–207Google Scholar
  6. Bateson P 1990 Is imprinting such a special case?;Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 329 125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bateson P 2000 What must be known in order to understand imprinting?; inThe evolution of cognition (eds) C Heyes and L Huber (Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press) pp 85–102Google Scholar
  8. Bateson P 2001 Fetal experience and good adult design;Int. J. Epidemiol. 26 561–570Google Scholar
  9. Bateson P 2004 The active role of behaviour in evolution;Biol. Philos. 19 283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bateson P and D’Udine B 1986 Exploration in two inbred strains of mice and their hybrids: additive and interactive models of gene expression;Anim. Behav. 34 1026–1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bateson P and Horn G 1994 Imprinting and recognition memorya neural-net model;Anim. Behav. 48 695–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bateson P and Martin P 2000Design for a life: How behaviour develops (London: Vintage Paperbacks)Google Scholar
  13. Bateson P and Young M 1981 Separation from mother and the development of play in cats;Anim. Behav. 29 l73-l80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bateson P, Martin P and Young M 1981 Effects of interrupting cat mothers’ lactation with bromocriptine on the subsequent play of their kittens;Physiol. Behav. 27 84l-845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bateson P, Mendl M and Feaver J 1990 Play in the domestic cat is enhanced by rationing the mother during lactation;Anim. Behav. 40 514–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bateson P, Horn G and Rose S P R 1975 Imprinting: Correlations between behaviour and incorporation of (14C) Uracil into chick brain;Brain Res. 84 207–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bateson P, Rose S P R and Horn G 1973 Imprinting: lasting effects on uracil incorporation into chick brain;Science 181 576–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bateson P, Barker D, Clutton-Brock T, Deb D, D’Udine, B Foley R A, Gluckman P, Godfrey K, Kirkwood T, Lahr M M, McNamara J, Metcalfe N B, Monaghan P, Spencer H G and Sultan S E 2004 Developmental plasticity and human health;Nature (London) 430 419–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bateson W 1909 Heredity and variation in modern lights; inDarwin and modern science (ed.) A C Seward (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 85–101Google Scholar
  20. Bock G R and Goode J A e 1998The limits of reductionism in biology Novartis Foundation Symposium 213, (Chichester: Wiley)Google Scholar
  21. Broadhurst P L 1979 The experimental approach to behavioural evolution; inTheoretical advances in behavioural genetics (eds) J R Royce and L P Mos (Alphen aan den Rijn: Sitjthoff and Noordhoff) pp 350–375Google Scholar
  22. Caro T M and Bateson P 1986 Organisation and ontogeny of alternative tactics;Anim. Behav. 34 1483–1499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cipolla-Neto J, Horn G and McCabe B J 1982 Hemispheric asymmetry and imprinting: the effect of sequential lesions to the hyperstriatum ventrale;Exp. Brain Res. 48 22–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dobzhansky T 1937Genetics and origin of species (New York: Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
  25. Evans J D and Wheeler D E 2000 Expression profiles during honeybee caste determination;Genome Biol. 2 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Evans J D and Wheeler D E 2001 Gene expression and the evo lution of insect polyphenisms;Bioessays 54 62–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gomendio M, Cassinello J, Smith M W and Bateson P 1995 Maternal state affects intestinal changes of rat pups at weaning;Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 37 71–80Google Scholar
  28. Gottlieb G 1992Individual development and evolution (New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  29. Gottlieb G 1997Synthesizing nature-nurture: prenatal roots of instinctive behaviour, (Mahwah: Erlbaum)Google Scholar
  30. Hales C N and Barker D J P 1992 Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus: the thrifty phenotype hypothesis;Diabetologia 35 595–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hales C N, Desai M and Ozanne S E 1997 The thrifty phenotype hypothesis: how does it look after 5 years?;Diabetic Med. 14 189–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heyes C and Huber L 2000The evolution of cognition (Cambridge: MIT Press)Google Scholar
  33. Hollis K L ten Cate C and Bateson P 1991 Stimulus representation: a subprocess of imprinting and conditioning;J. Comp. Psychol. 105 307–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Honey R C Horn G Bateson P and Walpole M 1995 Functionally distinct memories for imprinting stimuli: behavioral and neural dissociations;Behav. Neurosci. 109 689–698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horn G 1985Memory, Imprinting and the brain (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  36. Horn G 1998 Visual imprinting and the neural mechanisms of recognition memory;Trends Neurosci. 21 300–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Horn G 2000 In memory; inBrain, perception, memory: Advances in cognitive neuroscience (ed.) J J Bolhuis (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 329–363Google Scholar
  38. Horn G, McCabe B J and Bateson PPG 1979 An autoradiographic study of the chick brain after imprinting;Brain Res. 168 361–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Horn G, Rose S P R and Bateson PPG 1973 Monocular imprinting and regional incorporation of tritiated uracil into the brains of intact and ’split-brain’ chicks;Brain Res. 56 227–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Johnson M H and Horn G 1986 Dissociation between recognition memory and associative learning by a restricted lesion to the chick forebrain;Neuropsychologia 24 329–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnston T D and Edwards L 2002 Genes, interactions and the development of behavior;Psycholog. Rev. 109 26–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee T M and Zucker I 1988 Vole infant development is influenced perinatally by maternal photoperiodic history;Am. J. Physiol. 255 R831-R838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Lehrman D S 1970 Semantic and conceptual issues in the naturenurture problem; inDevelopment and Evolution of Behavior eds) L R Aronson, E Tobach, D S Lehrman and J S Rosenblatt (San Francisco: Freeman) pp 17–52Google Scholar
  44. Lott D F 1991Intraspecific variation in the social systems of wild veterbrates (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  45. Lloyd Morgan C 1896 On modification and variation;Science 4 733–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martin P 1984 The meaning of weaning;Anim. Behav. 32 1024–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin P and Bateson P 1985 The influence of experimentally manipulating a component of weaning on the development of play in domestic cats;Anim. Behav. 33 511–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mather K and Jinks J L 1971Biometrical genetics (London: Chapman and Hall)Google Scholar
  49. Mayr E 1963Animal species and evolution (Cambridge: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
  50. McNamara J M and Houston A I 1996 State-dependent lifehistories;Nature (London) 380 215–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moran N A 1992 The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes;Am. Nat. 139 249–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Muller H J 1940 Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics; inThe new systematics (ed.) J S Huxley (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 125–268Google Scholar
  53. Odling-Smee F J, Laland K N and Feldman M W 2003Niche construction: The neglected process of evolution (Princeton: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
  54. Orr H A and Presgraves D C 2000 Speciation by postzygotic isolation: forces, genes and molecules;BioEssays 22 1085–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Osborn H F 1896 Ontogenic and phylogenic variation;Science 4 786–789PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Oyama S, Griffiths P E and Gray R D 2001Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution (Cambridge: MIT Press)Google Scholar
  57. Piaget J 1979Behaviour and evolution (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul)Google Scholar
  58. Raff R A 1996The shape of life: genes, development and evolution of animal form (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
  59. Rowell C H F 1971 The variable coloration of the Acridoid grasshoppers;Adv. Insect Physiol. 8 145–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schlichting C D and Pigliucci M 1998Phenotypic evolution: A reaction norm perspective (Sunderland: Sinauer)Google Scholar
  61. Schmalhausen I I 1949Factors of evolution (Philadelphia: Blatiston)Google Scholar
  62. Simpson G G 1953 The Baldwin effect;Evolution 7 110–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith E F S 1991 Early social development in hooded rats(Rattus norvegicus): a link between weaning and play;Anim. Behav. 41 513–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Solomonia R O, Kiguradzw T, McCabe B J and Hprn G 2000 Neural cell adhesion molecules, CAM kinase II and long-term memory in the chick;Neuroreport 11 3139–3143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Spalding D A 1873 Instinct with original observations on young animals;Macmillan’s Mag. 27 282–293Google Scholar
  66. Tan P L and Counsilman J J 1985 The influence of weaning on prey-catching behaviour in kittens;Z. Tierpsychol. 70 148–164Google Scholar
  67. Waddington C H 1953 Genetic assimilation of an acquired character;Evolution 7 118–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Waddington C H 1957The strategy of the genes (London: Allen and Unwin)Google Scholar
  69. Wcislo W T 1989 Behavioral environments and evolutionary change;Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20 137–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Weber B H and Depew D J (eds) 2003Evolution and learning (Cambridge: MIT Press)Google Scholar
  71. West-Eberhard M J 2003Developmental plasticity and evolution (New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  72. Wright S 1963 Genic interaction; inMethodology in mammalian genetics (ed.) W J Burdette (San Francisco: Holden Day) pp 159–192Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick Bateson
    • 1
  1. 1.Sub-Department of Animal BehaviourUniversity of CambridgeMadingleyUK

Personalised recommendations