Coplanar (e, 3e) differential cross-section of He atom
- 29 Downloads
- 4 Citations
Abstract
We present in this paper the results of our calculation of five-fold differential cross-section (FDCS) for (e,3e) process on He atom in low momentum transfer and high electron impact energy in shake-off mechanism. The formalism has been developed in Born approximation using plane waves, Byron and Joachain as well as Le Sech and correlated BBK-type wave functions respectively for incident and scattered, bound and ejected electrons. The angular distribution of FDCS of our calculation is presented in various modes of coplanar geometry and comparison is made with the available experimental data. We observe that the present calculation is able to reproduce the trend of the experimental data. However, it differs in magnitude from the experiment. The present theory does not predict four-peak structure insummed mutual angle mode for lower excess ejected electron energies. We also discuss the importance of momentum transfer, post-collision interaction (PCI) and ion participation in the (e,3e) process in constant θ12 mode
Keywords
(e,3e) Process coplanar geometry five-fold differential cross-section shake-off mech-anismPACS Nos
34.80.Dp 34.50.FaPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]F W Jr Byron and C Joachain,Phys. Rev. 164, 1 (1967)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [2]R J Tweed,Z Phys. D23, 309 (1992)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [3]T A Carlson and M O Krause,Phys. Rev. 140, 1057 (1965)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [4]C Dal Cappello and H Le Rouzo,Phys. Rev. A43, 1395 (1991)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [5]J Berakdar and H Klar,J. Phys. B26, 4219 (1993)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [6]M K Srivastava, S Gupta and C Dal Cappello,Phys. Rev. A53, 4104 (1996)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [7]Yu V Popov, C Dal Cappello and K Kuzakov,J. Phys. B29, 5901 (1996)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [8]P Defrance, T M Kereselidze, Z S Machavariani and I L Noselidze,J. Phys. B33, 4323 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [9]A Lahmam-Bennani, I Taouil, A Duguet, M Lecas, L Avaldi and J Berakdar,Phys. Rev. A59, 3548 (1999)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [10]A Kheifets, I Bray, A Lahmam-Bennani, A Duguet and I Taouil,J. Phys. B32, 5047 (1999)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [11]M Grin, C Dal Cappello, R El Mkhanter and J Rasch,J. Phys. B33, 131 (2000)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [12]A Lahmam-Bennani, A Duguet, M N Gaboriuad, I Taouil, M Lecas, A Kheifets, J Berakdar and C Dal Cappello,J. Phys. B34, 3073 (2001)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [13]A Kheifets, I Bray, J Berakdar and C Dal Cappello,J. Phys. B35, L15 (2002)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [14]A Lahmam-Bennani, A Duguet and S Roussin,J. Phys. B35, L59 (2002)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [15]A Lahmam-Bennani, C Dupre and A Duguet,Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1582 (1989)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [16]G Garibotti and J E Miragila,Phys. Rev. A21, 572 (1980)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [17]I Taouil, A Lahmam-Bennani, A Duguet and L Avaldi,Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4600 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [18]K Muktavat and M K Srivastava,Pramana—J. Phys. 58, 39 (2002)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [19]A Dorn, A Kheifets, C D Schröter, B Najjari, C Höhr, R Moshammer and J Ullrich,Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3755 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [20]A Dorn, A Kheifets, C D Schröter, B Najjari, C Höhr, R Moshammer and J Ullrich,Phys. Rev. A65, 032709 (2002)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [21]F W Jr Byron and C Joachain,Phys. Rev. 146, 1 (1966)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- [22]C Le Sech,J. Phys. B30, L47 (1997)Google Scholar
- [23]M Brauner, J S Briggs and H Klar,J. Phys. B22, 2265 (1989)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [24]D Waymel, L Andric, J Mazeau, P Selles and A Huetz,J. Phys. B26, L123 (1993)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [25]B El Marji, C Schröter, A Duguet, A Lahmam-Bennani, M Lecas and L Spielberger,J. Phys. B30, 3677 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [26]C Schröter, B El Marji, A Lahmam-Bennani, A Duguet, M Lecas and L Spielberger,J. Phys. B31, 131 (1998)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [27]A Lahmam-Bennani, private communication (unpublished)Google Scholar