Advertisement

Journal of Earth System Science

, Volume 113, Issue 4, pp 605–618 | Cite as

High-Ti type N-MORB parentage of basalts from the south Andaman ophiolite suite, India

  • Rajesh K. Srivastava
  • R. Chandra
  • Anant Shastry
Article

Abstract

A complete dismembered sequence of ophiolite is well exposed in the south Andaman region that mainly comprises ultramafic cumulates, serpentinite mafic plutonic and dyke rocks, pillow lava, radiolarian chert, and plagiogranite. Pillow lavas of basaltic composition occupy a major part of the Andaman ophiolite suite (AOS). These basalts are well exposed all along the east coast of southern part of the south AOS. Although these basalts are altered due to low-grade metamorphism and late hydrothermal processes, their igneous textures are still preserved. These basalts are mostly either aphyric or phyric in nature. Aphyric type exhibits intersertal or variolitic textures, whereas phyric variety shows porphyritic or sub-ophitic textures. The content of alkalies and silica classify these basalts as sub-alkaline basalts and alkaline basalts. A few samples show basaltic andesite, trachy-basalt, or basanitic chemical composition. High-field strength element (HFSE) geochemistry suggests that studied basalt samples are probably derived from similar parental magmas. Al2O3/TiO2 and CaO/TiO2 ratios classify these basalts as high-Ti type basalt. On the basis of these ratios and many discriminant functions and diagrams, it is suggested that the studied basalts, associated with Andaman ophiolite suite, were derived from magma similar to N-MORB and emplaced in the mid-oceanic ridge tectonic setting.

Keywords

Andaman ophiolite suite high-Ti basalt geochemistry N-MORB 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal S, Guevara M and Verma S P 2004 Discriminant analysis applied to establish major element field boundaries for tectonic varieties of basic rocks;Int. Geol. Rev. 46 575–594Google Scholar
  2. Coleman R G 1977Ophiolites: Ancient Oceanic Lithosphere (Berlin: Springer Verlag)Google Scholar
  3. Church W R and Coish R A 1976 Oceanic versus island-arc origin of ophiolites;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 31 8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Floyd P A and Winchester J A 1978 Identification and discrimination of altered and metamorphosed volcanic rocks using immobile elements;Chem. Geol. 21 291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Govindaraju K 1994 1994: compilation of working values and descriptions for 383 Geostandards.Geostandards Newsletter 18 1–158Google Scholar
  6. Haldar D 1984 Some aspects of the Andaman ophiolite complex;Record Geol. Surv. India 115 1–11Google Scholar
  7. Hamilton W 1978Tectonic map of the Indonesian region. Folio of the Indonesian Region Map I-875-D, Department of the Interior; US Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  8. Irvine T N and Baragar W R A 1971 A guide to the chemical classification of the common volcanic rocks;Canadian J. Earth Sci. 8 523–548Google Scholar
  9. Jochum K P and Verma S P 1996 Extreme enrichment of Sb, Tl, and other trace elements in altered MORB;Chem. Geol. 130 289–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karunakaran C, Ray K K, Sen C R and Saha S S 1968 Tertiary sedimentation in the Andaman-Nicobar geosyncline;J. Geol. Soc. India 9 32–39Google Scholar
  11. Lechler P J and Desilets M O 1987 A review of the use of loss on ignition as a measurement of total volatiles in whole rock analysis;Chem. Geol. 63 341–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Le Bas M J, Le Maitre R W, Streckeisen A and Zanettin B 1986 A chemical classification of volcanic rocks on the total alkali-silica diagram;J. Petrol. 27 745–750Google Scholar
  13. Le Maitre R W 2002Igneous Rocks: A classification and glossary of terms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 236 pGoogle Scholar
  14. Ling Y H, Chandra R and Karkare S G 1996 Tectonic significance of Eocene and Cretaceous radiolaria from south Andaman Islands, northeast Indian Ocean;The Island Arc 5 166–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Longerich H P 1995 Analysis of pressed pellets of geological samples using wavelength dispersive X-ray fluorescence;X-ray Spectrometry 24 123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacDonald G A and Katsura T 1964 Chemical composition of Hawaiian lavas;J. Petrol. 5 83–133Google Scholar
  17. Middlemost E A K 1989 Iron oxidation ratios, norms and the classification of volcanic rocks;Chem. Geol. 77 19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miyashiro A 1973 The Troodos ophiolitic complex was probably formed in an island arc;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 19 218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pearce J A 1983 Role of sub-continental lithosphere in magma genesis at active continental margins. In:Continental Basalts and Mantle Xenoliths (eds C J Hawkesworth and M J Norry), Shiva, Nantwich, pp 230–249Google Scholar
  20. Pearce J A and Cann J R 1971 Ophiolite origin investigated by discriminant analysis using Ti, Zr and Y;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 12 339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pearce J A and Cann J R 1973 Tectonic setting of basic volcanic rocks determined using trace element analysis;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 19 290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ray K K, Sengupta S and Van den Hul H J 1988 Chemical characters of volcanic rocks from Andaman ophiolite, India;J. Geol. Soc. London 145 393–400Google Scholar
  23. Rollinson H 1993Using geochemical data: evolution, presentation, interpretation; Longman Scientific & Technical, UK, 344 pGoogle Scholar
  24. Saunders A D and Tarney J 1984 Geochemical characteristics of basaltic volcanism within back-arc basins; In:Marginal Basin Geology (eds B P Kokelaar and M F Howells),Spec. Publ. Geol. Soc. London 16 59–76Google Scholar
  25. Seewald J S and Seyfried W E 1990 The effect of temperature on metal mobility in sub-seafloor hydrothermal systems: constraints from basalt alteration experiments;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 101 388–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shastry A, Srivastava Rajesh K, Chandra R and Jenner G A 2001 Fe-Ti enriched mafic rocks from south Andaman ophiolite suite: implication of late stage liquid immiscibility;Curr. Sci. 80 453–454Google Scholar
  27. Shastry A, Srivastava Rajesh K, Chandra R and Jenner G A 2002 Geochemical characteristics and genesis of oceanic plagiogranites associated with south Andaman Ophiolite Suite, India: a late stage silicate liquid immiscible product;J. Geol. Soc. India 59 233–241Google Scholar
  28. Sheth H C, Torres-Alvarado I S and Verma S P 2002 What is the “calc-alkaline rock series”?;Int. Geol. Rev. 44 686–701Google Scholar
  29. Shervais J W 1982 Ti-V plots and the petrogenesis of modern and ophiolitic lavas;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 59 101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sun S-S 1980 Lead isotopic study of young volcanic rocks from mid-ocean ridges, ocean islands and island arcs;Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A297 409–445Google Scholar
  31. Sun S-S and Nesbitt R W 1977 Chemical heterogeneity of the Archaean mantle, composition of the earth and mantle evolution;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 35 429–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun S-S and Nesbitt R W 1978 Geochemical regularities and genetic significance of ophiolitic basalts;Geology 28 689–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Torres-Alvarado I S, Verma S P, Palacios-Berruete H, Guevara M and González-Castillo O Y 2003 DC_BASE: a database system to manage Nernst distribution coefficients and its application to partial melting modeling;Comput. Geosci. 29 1191–1198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vasconcelos F M, Verma S P and Vargas B R C 2001 Diagrama Ti-V: una nueva propuesta de discriminación para magmas básicos en cinco ambientes tectónicos;Rev. Mex. Cienc. Geol. 18 162–174Google Scholar
  35. Verma S P 1992 Seawater alteration effects on REE, K, Rb, Cs, Sr, U, Th, Pb, and Sr-Nd-Pb isotope systematics of mid-ocean ridge basalts;Geochem. J. 26 159–177Google Scholar
  36. Verma S P 2004 Solely extension-related origin of the eastern to west-central Mexican Volcanic Belt (Mexico) from partial melting inversion model;Curr. Sci. 86 713–719Google Scholar
  37. Verma S P, Torres-Alvarado I S and Sotelo-Rodríguez Z T 2002 SINCLAS: standard igneous norm and volcanic rock classification system;Comput. Geosci. 28 711–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Verma S P, Torres-Alvarado I S and Velasco-Tapia F 2003 A revised CIPW norm;Schweiz. Miner. Petrog. Mitteil. 83 197–216Google Scholar
  39. Vohra C P, Haldar D and Ghosh Roy A K 1989 The Andaman-Nicobar ophiolite complex and associated mineral resources—current appraisal; In:Phanerozoic Ophiolites of India (ed. N C G hose), Sumna Publ. & Distib., Patna, pp 281–315Google Scholar
  40. Winchester J A and Floyd P A 1976 Geochemical magma type discrimination: application to altered and metamorphosed basic igneous rocks;Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 28 459–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Winchester J A and Floyd P A 1977 Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements;Chem. Geol. 20 325–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Winter J D 2001Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology (New Jersey: Prentice Hall) 697 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Printed in India 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajesh K. Srivastava
    • 1
  • R. Chandra
    • 2
  • Anant Shastry
    • 1
  1. 1.Igneous Petrology Laboratory, Department of GeologyBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeologyBundelkhand UniversityJhansiIndia

Personalised recommendations