Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 267–273 | Cite as

The ontogeny of kin recognition in tadpoles of the toadBufo melanostictus (Anura; Bufonidae)

  • S. K. Saidapur
  • S. Girish


The ontogeny of kin recognition and influence of social environment on the development of kin recognition behaviour was experimentally investigated in tadpoles of Bufo melanostictus that lived in aggregations and showed low larval dispersion. Embryos and tadpoles of the toad were reared as (i) kin only, (ii) with kin and non-kin (separated by a mesh screen), and (iii) in isolation. They were tested for the ability to discriminate between (i) familiar siblings and unfamiliar non-siblings, (ii) familiar siblings and familiar non-siblings and, (iii) unfamiliar siblings and unfamiliar non-siblings. All tadpoles were fed on boiled spinach before conducting trials. Preference of test tadpoles to associate near the end compartments whether empty or containing members of specific stimulus groups was assessed using a rectangular choice tank. When tested in tanks with empty end compartments, the test tadpoles showed random distribution and thus no bias for the apparatus or the procedure. In the presence of kin/non-kin in the end compartments a significantly greater number of test tadpoles spent the majority of the time near familiar or unfamiliar kin rather than near familiar or unfamiliar non-kin. Kin discrimination ability persisted throughout larval development. Familiarity with siblings is not required for discriminating kin from non-kin, and kin discrimination ability is not modified following exposure to non-kin. Also, involvement of dietary cues is unlikely to be the prime mechanism of kin recognition inB. melanostictus unlike in some other anurans.


Bufo melanostictus kin recognition tadpoles toad 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blaustein A R 1983 Kin recognition mechanisms: Matching or recognition alleles.Am. Nat. 121 749–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaustein A R 1988 Ecological correlates and potential functions of kin recognition and kin association in anuran larvae;Behav. Genet. 18 449–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaustein A R and O'Hara R K 1981 Genetic control for sibling recognition?;Nature (London) 290 246–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaustein A R and O'Hara R K 1982a Kin recognition inRana cascadae tadpoles: Maternal and paternal effects;Anim. Behav. 30 1151–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blaustein A R and O'Hara R K 1982b Kin recognition cues inRana cascadae tadpoles;Behav. Neural. Biol. 36 77–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blaustein A R and O'Hara R K 1983 Kin recognition inRana cascadae tadpoles: Effects of rearing with non siblings and varying the strength of the stimulus cues;Behav. Neural. Biol. 39 259–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaustein A R and O'Hara R K 1986a Kin recognition in tadpoles;Sci. Am. 254 108–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blaustein A R and O'Hara R K 1986b An investigation of kin recognition in red legged frog (Rana aurora) tadpoles;J. Zool. 209 347–353Google Scholar
  9. Blaustein A R and Waldman B 1992 Kin recognition in anuran amphibians;Anim. Behav. 44 207–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaustein A R, O'Hara R K and Olson D H 1984 Kin preference is present after metamorphosis inRana cascadae frogs;Anim. Behav. 32 445–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blaustein A R, Bekof M, Beyers J and Daniels T J 1991 Kin recognition in vertebrates: What do we really know about adaptive value?;Anim. Behav. 41 1079–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cornell J T, Berven K A and Gamboa G J 1989 Kin recognition by tadpoles and froglets of wood frogRana sylvatica;Oecologia 78 312–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fishwild T G, Schemidt R A, Jankens K M, Berven K A, Gamboa G J and Richards C M 1990 Sibling recognition by larval frogs (Rana pipens, Rana sylvatica, Pseudacris crucifer);J. Herpetol. 24 40–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fletcher D J C and Michener C D 1987Kin recognition in animals (New York: John Wiley)Google Scholar
  15. Gamboa G J, Berven K A, Schmidt R A, Fishwild J and Jankens K M 1991 Kin recognition in larval wood frogs: effects of diet and prior exposure to nonspecific;Oecologia 86 319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Girish S and Saidapur S K 1999 The effects of kinship and density on growth and metamorphosis of the bronze frog (Rana temporalis) tadpoles;Acta Ethol. 2 61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gosner K L 1960 A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification;Herpetologica 16 183–190Google Scholar
  18. Grafen A 1990 Do animals really recognize kin?;Anim. Behav. 39 42–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall J A, Larsen J R, Don J H M E and Fitzner RE 1995 Discrimination of kin- and diet-based cues by larval spade-foots,Scaphiopus intermontanus (Anura: Pelobatidae), under normal conditions;J. Herpetol. 29 233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lacy R C and Sherman P W 1983 Kin recognition by phenotypic matching;Am. Nat. 121 489–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. O'Hara R K and Blaustein A R 1981 An investigation of sibling recognition inRana cascadae tadpoles;Anim. Behav. 29 1121–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O'Hara R K and Blaustein A R 1982 Kin preference behaviour inBufo boreas tadpoles;Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11 43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O'Hara R K and Blaustein A R 1985Rana cascade tadpoles aggregate with siblings: An experimental field study;Oecologia 67 44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O'Hara R K and Blaustein A R 1988Hyla regila andRana pretiosa tadpoles fail to display kin recognition behavior;Anim. Behav. 36 946–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pfennig D W 1990 “Kin recognition” among spadefoot tadpoles: a side effect of habitat selection?;Evolution 44 785–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pfennig D W and Sherman P W 1995 Kin recognition;Sci. Am. (June) 68–73Google Scholar
  27. Saidapur S K and Girish S 2001 Growth and metamorphosis ofBufo melanostictus tadpoles: Effects of kinship and density;J. Herpetol. (in press)Google Scholar
  28. Sokal R R and Rohlf F J 1995 Miscellaneous methods: inBiometry (III edition) (eds) R R Sokal and F J Rohlf (San Francisco: W H Freeman) pp 794–797Google Scholar
  29. Waldman B 1981 Sibling recognition in toad tadpoles: The role of experience;Z. Tierpsychol. 56 341–358Google Scholar
  30. Waldman B 1982 Sibling association among schooling toad tadpoles: field evidence and implications;Anim. Behav. 30 700–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Waldman B 1984 Kin recognition and sibling association among wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpoles;Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 14 171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Waldman B 1986 Preference for unfamiliar siblings over non-familiar siblings in American toad (Bufo americanus) tadpoles;Anim. Behav. 34 48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Waldman B 1987 Mechanisms of kin recognition;J. Theor. Biol. 128 159–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waldman B 1988 The ecology of kin recognition;Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19 543–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waldman B 1989 Do anuran larvae retain kin recognition abilities following metamorphosis;Anim. Behav. 37 1055–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Waldman B 1991 Kin recognition in amphibians; inKin recognition (ed.) P G Hepper (Cambridge: Cambridge University press) pp 162–219Google Scholar
  37. Waldman B and Adler K 1979 Toad tadpoles associate preferentially with siblings;Nature (London) 282 611–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. K. Saidapur
    • 1
  • S. Girish
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyKarnatak UniversityDharwadIndia

Personalised recommendations