Advertisement

Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 657–664 | Cite as

Defense and carnivory: Dual role of bracts inPassiflora foetida

  • T R Radhamani
  • L Sudarshana
  • Rani Krishnan
Article

Abstract

Members of the genusPassiflora are reported to have evolved modifications which kill insects; they have however never been tested for carnivorous syndrome. The flowers ofPassiflora foetida consists of highly reticulate bracts which cover and grow along with the buds and fruits. Removal of bracts from developing bud and fruit resulted in higher predatory damage compared to those where the bracts were intact. These bracts also possess a large number of minute glands which ooze sticky secretion. A variety of tiny insects were found trapped by the secretion of the bracts. The secretion of these glands show high proteases and acid phosphatase activity, two common digestive enzymes found in traps of true carnivorous plants. A high quantity of aminoacids were released from freshly freeze killed ants when incubated in buffer extract of bracts-[14C] phenylalanine smeared on the glandular surface of bracts was recovered from ovules suggesting potential for absorption of aminoacids. These results suggest a novel role for bracts where primary function is to minimize predatory damage to developing flowers and fruits. The bracts serve as insect traps and also possess the mechanism to digest the trapped insects to obtain free aminoacids.

Keywords

Passiflora foetida bracts proteolytic enzymes carnivory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amagasse 1972 Digestive enzymes in insectivorous plants III. Acid proteases in the genusNepenthes andDrosera peltata;J. Biochem. Tokyo 72 73–81Google Scholar
  2. Benzing D H 1987 The origin and rarity of botanical carnivory;TREE 2 367–369Google Scholar
  3. Benzing D H, Henderson K. Kessel B and Sulak V 1976 The absorptive capacities of bromeliad trichomes;Am. J. Bot. 63 1009–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradford M M 1976 A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding;Anal. Biochem. 72 248–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burk R R, Eschenbruch M E, Leuthard P and Steck G 1983 Sensitive detection of proteins and peptides in polyacrylamide gels after formaldehyde fixation;Methods Enzymol. 91 247–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis B J 1964 Disc electrophoresis II. Methods and application to human serum proteins;Ann. N. Y. Acad Sci. 121 404–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dubois M. Gilles K A, Hamilton J K, Rebers P A and Smith F 1956 Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances;Anal Chem. 28 350–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dutta A C 1988A text book of botany (Calcutta: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert L E 1971 Butterfly-Plant Co-evolution: Has Passiflora won the selectional race withHeliconini butterflies?;Science 172 585–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heslop-Harrison Y 1975 Enzyme release in carnivorous plants; inLysozomes in biology and pathology (eds) J T Dingle and R T Dean (Amsterdam: North Holland) vol 4, pp 525–578Google Scholar
  11. Heslop-Harrison Y 1976 Enzyme secretion and digestive uptake in carnivorous plants; inPerspectives in experimental biology S E B Symposial Volume 2.Proceedings of the 50th Anniversary Meeting, Cambridge, 1974 (ed.) N Sutherland (Oxford: Pergamon Press) pp 463–476Google Scholar
  12. Heslop-Harrison Y and Knox R B 1971 A cytochemical study of the leaf-gland enzymes of insectivorous plants of the genusPinguicula;Planta 96 183–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Juniper B E, Robins R J and Joel D M 1989The carnivorous plants (New York: Academic Press)Google Scholar
  14. Kakade M L, Simons N R and Liener I S 1969 An evaluation of natural versus synthetic substrates for the autotryptic activity of soybean samples;Cereal Chem. 46 518–521Google Scholar
  15. Lloyd F E 1942The carnivorous plants (Waltham: Chronica Botanica Co.)Google Scholar
  16. Lowry O H, Roberts N R, Mei-Ring W N, Hixon W S and Crawford E J 1954J. Biol. Chem. 207 19–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Moore and Stein 1948 Photometric ninhydrin method for use in the chromatography of amino acids;J. Biol. Chem. 176 367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rachmilevitz T and Joel D M 1976 Ultra structure of the calyx glands ofPlumbago capensis Thumb. in relation to the process of secretion;lsr. J. Bot. 25 159–168Google Scholar
  19. Rickson F R 1979 Absorption of animal tissue breakdown products into a plant stem —the feeding of a plant by ants;Am. J. Bot. 66 87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robins R J and Juniper B E 1980 The secretory cycle ofDionaea muscipula Ellis IV. The enzymology of the secretion;New Phytol. 86 401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rost K and Schauer R 1977 Physical and chemical properties of the mucin secreted byDrosera capensis;Phytochemistry 16 1365–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scala J, Jott K. Schwab D W and Semerskey F E 1969 Digestive secretion ofDionaea muscipula (Venus Flytrap);Plant Physiol. 44 367–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sutherst R W and Wilson L J 1986 Tropical legumes and their ability to immobilize and kill cattle ticks; inInsects and the plant surface (eds) B E Juniper and T R E Southwood (London: Edward Arnold)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • T R Radhamani
    • 1
  • L Sudarshana
    • 2
  • Rani Krishnan
    • 3
  1. 1.Promotion of Research and Developmental Efforts in Selected Crops (Sunflower), P C UnitUniversity of Agricultural SciencesBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiochemistryUniversity of Agricultural SciencesBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.French InstitutePondicherryIndia

Personalised recommendations