Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 239–245 | Cite as

Vocalization of the tree frogPolypedates maculatus (Rhacophoridae)

  • R. D. Kanamadi
  • H. Schneider
  • C. R. Hiremath
  • C. S. Jirankali
Article

Abstract

The period of calling activity ofPolypedates maculatus lies between April and October. Males possess an indistinct subgular vocal sac which turns yellow during the breeding season. Mating calls type I, type II and distress calls have been identified. Mating calls type I and type II consist of a single pulse group. Type I call comprises of 7–22 pulses, whereas type II call consists of 4–6 pulses. Pulses are short. The frequency spectrum is broad and continuous. Distress calls, with 6 hormonics, are given by the females with their mouth open.

Keywords

Tree frog mating call distress call 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bogert C M 1960 The influence of sound on the behavior of amphibians and reptiles; inAnimal and sound communication (eds) W E Lynyon and W N Tavolga (Washington: Am. Inst. Biol. Sci. Publ.) pp 137–320Google Scholar
  2. Blair W E 1963 Acoustic behavior in amphibia; inAcoustic behavior of animals (ed.) R G Busnel (Amsterdam: Elsevier) pp 694–708, 803–804Google Scholar
  3. Blair W E 1968 Amphibians and reptiles; inAnimal communication (ed.) T A Sebeok (Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press) pp 289–230Google Scholar
  4. Brzoska 1982 Vocal response of European water frogs (Rana esculenta complex) to mating and territorial calls;Behav. Process. 7 37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capranica R R 1977 Auditory processing of vocal signals; inThe reproductive biology of amphibians (eds) D H Taylor and SI Guttman (New York: Plenum Press) pp 337–355Google Scholar
  6. Duellman W E and Trueb L 1985 Vocalization; inBiology of amphibians (eds) W E Duellman and L Trueb (New York: McGraw Hill) pp 87–107Google Scholar
  7. Gerhardt H C 1978 Mating call recognition in the green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea): The significance of some fine-temporal properties;J. Exp. Biol 74 59–73Google Scholar
  8. Kanamadi R D and Jirnakali C S 1991 Ovarian activity in the tree frogPolypedates maculatus: A qualitative and quantitative study of ovarian cycle and its relation to oviduct and fat body cycle;Zool. Am. 226 149–162Google Scholar
  9. Kanamadi R D and Jirankali C S 1992 Testicular activity inPolypedates maculatus (Rhacophoridae): Seasonal changes in spermatogenesis and fat bodies;J. Herpetol 26 329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kanamadi R D and Hiremath C R 1989 Anuran amphibian fauna of Dharwad;J. Karnatak Univ. Sci. 33 8–12Google Scholar
  11. Kanamadi R D, Hiremath C R and Schneider H 1992 Vocalization and breeding in South Indian tropical frogRana crassa (Jerdon);Zool. Am. 228 26–31Google Scholar
  12. Kuramoto M 1975 Mating calls of Japanese tree frogs (Rhacophoridae);Bull. Fakuoka Univ. Edac. 24 66–67Google Scholar
  13. Kuramoto M 1986 Call structure of the rhacophorid frogs from Taiwan;Sci. Rep. Lab. Amphibian Biol Hiroshima Univ. 8 45–68Google Scholar
  14. Littlejohn M J 1977 Long range acoustic communication in anurans: An integrated and evolutionary approach; inThe reproductive biology of amphibians (eds) D H Taylor and S I Guttman (New York: Plenum Press) pp 263–294Google Scholar
  15. Paillette M 1971 Communication acoustique chez les amphibians anoures;J. Psychol. Norm. Pathol. 1327–351Google Scholar
  16. Rand A S 1988 An overview of anuran acoustic communication; inThe evolution of amphibian auditory system (eds) B Fritzsch, M J Ryan, W Wilczynski, T E Hetherington and W Wolkowiak (New York: John Wiley) pp 415–431Google Scholar
  17. Ryan M J 1988 Constraints and patterns in the evolution of anuran acoustic communication; inThe evolution of amphibian auditory system (eds) B Fritzsch, M J Ryan, W Wilczynski, T E Hetherington and W Wolkowiak (New York: John Wiley) pp 637–677Google Scholar
  18. Schiotz A 1967 The tree frogs (Rhaeophoridae) of West Africa;Spolia Zool. Mus. Hauniensis 25 1–346Google Scholar
  19. Schneider H 1967 Rufe and Rufverhalten des Laubfrosches,Hyla arborea arborea (L).Z. Vql. Physiol 57 174–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schneider H 1971 Steuerung des taglichen Rufbeginns beim Laubfrosch,Hyla arborea arborea (L.):Oecologia 8 310–320Google Scholar
  21. Schneider H 1977 Acoustic behavior and physiology of vocalization in the European tree frogHyla arborea; inThe reproductive biology of amphibians (eds) D H Taylor and S I Guttman (New York: Plenum Press) pp 295–336Google Scholar
  22. Schneider H 1982 Phonotaxis bei Weibchen des Kanarischen Laubfrosches,Hyla meridionalis Zool Anz. 208 161–174Google Scholar
  23. Schneider H 1990 Reproductive behavior and biology of central European water frogs; inBiology and physiology of amphibians (ed.) W Hanke (Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag) pp 29–39Google Scholar
  24. Schneider H, Nevo E, Simson S and Brzoska J 1984 Auditory discrimination tests of female near estern tree frogs and reevaluation of the systematic position (Amphibia, Hylidae);Zool. Anz. 213 306–312Google Scholar
  25. Schneider H, Hussein F and Akef M S A 1986 Comparative bioacoustic studies in the yellow-bellied toad,Bombina variegata (L), and relationship of European and Asian species and subspecies of the genusBombina (Anura, Amphibia);Bonn. Zool. Beitr. 37 49–67Google Scholar
  26. Straughan I R 1973 Evolution of mating calls: Bioacoustical aspects; inEvolutionary biology of the anurans (ed.) J A Vial (Columbia: Univ. Missouri Press) pp 321–327Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. D. Kanamadi
    • 1
  • H. Schneider
    • 1
    • 2
  • C. R. Hiremath
    • 1
  • C. S. Jirankali
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyKarnatak UniversityDharwadIndia
  2. 2.Zoologisches InstitutUniversitat BonnBonn 1Germany

Personalised recommendations