Advertisement

Journal of Biosciences

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 111–119 | Cite as

Association of drongos with myna flocks: Are drongos benefitted?

  • T. Veena
  • R. Lokesha
Article

Abstract

Common myna(Acridotherus tristis) and jungle myna(Acridotherus fuscus) forage in pure and mixed flocks of various sizes in fallow lands. These flocks were often found associated with drongos that forage individually on the insects herded out by the movements of the flocking myna. We report here the benefits and costs of such association to drongos and mynas. Drongos had a tendency to associate with larger (> 21) than smaller (<20) flocks irrespective of the species composition of the flocks. Drongos associated with larger flocks showed increased foraging trips and harvested more insects in a given time than those that were either isolated or were associated with small flocks. The food range of drongos and mynas differed significantly indicating that they do not compete with each other. Thus our results indicate that drongos are benefitted by this association; however this association neither benefits nor costs to the mynas. The association between the drongos and mynas therefore appears to be commensalistic.

Keywords

Drongo myna flocking commensalism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ali S 1979The book of Indian birds (Bombay: Bombay Natural History Society)Google Scholar
  2. Barnard C J 1980 Flock feeding and time budgets in the house sparrow;Anim. Behav. 28 295–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnard C J and Stephens H 1983 Costs and benefits of single and mixed species flocking in field fares(Turdus pilaris) and red wings(T. iliacus);Behaviour 84 91–123Google Scholar
  4. Conradsom S D and Raistrick T D 1989 Honey guides and Honey gatherers: Interspecific communication in a symbiotic relationship;Science 243 1343–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Khan A R 1990 Feeding habits of Black drongo;Newslett. Birdwatchers 30 6Google Scholar
  6. Kittie R A 1980 Application of search theory to the analysis of prey aggregation as an antipredation tactic;J. Theor. Biol 87 201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mirritt P G 1980 Group foraging by mocking birds in a Florida strangler fig;Auk 97 868–872Google Scholar
  8. Morse D H 1970 Ecological aspects of some mixed species foraging flocks in birds;Ecol. Monogr. 40 119–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Powell G V N 1974 Experimental analysis of the social value of flocking in Stralings(Sturnus vulgaris) in relation to predation and foraging;Anim. Behav. 22 501–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pulliam H R 1973 On the advantages of flocking;J. Theor. Biol. 38 419–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sharma SK 1991 Nocturnal feeding by black drongo.Newslett. Birdwatchers 31 8Google Scholar
  12. Snedecor G W and Cochran W G 1968Statistical Methods (New Delhi: Oxford andIBH)Google Scholar
  13. Thompson DBA and Barnard C J 1983 Anti-predator responses in mixed species associations of lapwings, golden plovers and black headed gulls;Anim. Behav. 31 585–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Williamson P 1971 Feeding ecology of the red-eyed vireo(Vireo olivareus) and associated foliage-gleaning birds;Ecol. Monogr. 41 129–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Veena
    • 1
  • R. Lokesha
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Veterinary Physiology, Veterinary CollegeUniversity of Agricultural SciencesHebbal, BangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Genetics and Plant BreedingUniversity of Agricultural SciencesBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations