Advertisement

Journal of Earth System Science

, Volume 111, Issue 1, pp 63–77 | Cite as

Thermal internal boundary layer characteristics at a tropical coastal site as observed by a mini-SODAR under varying synoptic conditions

  • Thara V. Prabha
  • R. Venkatesan
  • Erich Mursch-Radlgruber
  • G. Rengarajan
  • N. Jayanthi
Article

Abstract

Atmospheric boundary layer observations are conducted at a coastal site during a transition phase from winter to summer season over the Indian peninsula. Thermal Internal Boundary Layer (TIBL) characteristics in presence of an off-shore and a weakly influenced on-shore synoptic wind are examined with the help of measurements carried out with a mini-SODAR (SOund Detection And Ranging), tethered balloon, and tower-based micrometeorological measurements. Influence of the changing synoptic scale conditions on turbulent characteristics of TIBL is discussed.

Mini-SODAR data showed the development and decay of sea and land breeze. It is seen that the characteristics of TIBL over the coastal land after sea breeze onset are similar to that of a shallow convective boundary layer (CBL) commonly found over plain land. Inside the TIBL, a maximum wind speed was noted close to the surface due to the penetration of sea breeze. In the off-shore case, a distinct sea breeze circulation was observed unlike in the case of on-shore flow. In the presence of weak on-shore case, a ‘minor sea’ breeze is noted before the establishment of sea breeze and a reduction in the momentum fluxes gives rise to decrease in the turbulence intensity. Updraft in the sea breeze front was stronger during weak synoptic conditions. Influence of synoptic changes on the sea breeze-land breeze circulation such as onset, strength and duration of the sea-land breeze are also examined.

Keywords

Sea breeze thermal internal boundary layer turbulence SODAR 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arritt R W 1993 Numerical modeling of the offshore extent of sea breezes;Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 115 547–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asimakopoulos D N, Helmis C G and Petrakis M 1996 Mini-Acoustic sounding — a powerful tool for ABL applications: recent advances and applications of acoustic mini-SODARs;Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 81 49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkins N T and Wakimoto R M 1997 Influence of the synoptic scale flow on sea breezes observed during CaPE;Mon. Weather Rev. 125 (9) 2112–2130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkins N T, Wakimoto R M 1995 Observations of sea breeze front during CaPE. Part II: Dual Doppler and aircraft analysis;Mon. Weather Rev. 123 944–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banta R M, Oliver L D and Levinson D H 1993a Evolution of the Monterey Bay sea breeze layer as observed by pulsed Doppler lidar;J. Atmos. Sci. 50 3959–3982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bechtold P, Pinty J P and Mascart P 1991 Numerical investigation of the influence of large scale winds on sea breeze and inland breeze type circulation;J. Appl. Meteorol. 30 1268–1279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiba O, Kobayashi F, Naito G and Sassa K 1999 Helicopter observations of the sea breeze over a coastal area;J. Appl. Meteorol. 38 481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colacino M and Dell’ Osso L 1978 The local Atmospheric circulation in the Rome Area: Surface observations;Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 14 133–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colacino M 1982 Observation of sea breeze events in Rome area;Arch. Meteorol. Geoph. Biok. 30 127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Estoque M A 1962 The sea breeze as a function of the prevailing synoptic situation;J. Atmos. Sci. 19 244–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garratt J R, Pielke R A, Miller W F and Lee T J 1990 Mesoscale model response to random surface based perturbations — a sea breeze experiment;Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 52 313–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gera B S, Saxena Neeraj 1996 Sodar data — a useful input for dispersion modeling;Atmospheric Environment,30 (21), 3623–3631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gera B S, Singal S P 1990, Sodar in air pollution meteorology;Atmospheric Environment 24A (8-2), 2003–2009Google Scholar
  14. Helmis C G, Asimakopoulos D N, Deligiorgi D G and Lalas D P 1987 Observations of sea breeze fronts near the shoreline,Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 38 395–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Helmis C G, Papadopoulos K H, Kalogiros J A, Soilemes A T and Asimakopoulos D N 1995a Influence of background flow on evolution of saronic gulf sea breeze;Atmospheric Environment 29 (24) 3689–3701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helmis C G, Kalogiros J A, Asimakopoulos D N, Papadopoulos K H and Soilemes A T 1995b Acoustic Sounder Measurements of Atmospheric Turbulent Fluxes on the Shoreline;Global Atmos. Ocean System 2 351–362.Google Scholar
  17. Kunhikrishnan P K, Gupta K S, Ramachandran R, Prakash J W, Nair K N 1993 Study on thermal internal boundary layer structure over Thumba, India;Annales Geophysicae-atmospheres Hydrospheres and Space Sciences 11 (1) 52–60Google Scholar
  18. Mastrantonio G, Viola A P, Argentini S, Fiocco G, Giannini L, Rossini L, Abbate G, Ocone R and Casonato M 1994, Observations of sea breeze events in Rome and the surrounding area by a network of Doppler SODARs;Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 71 67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mursch-Radlgruber E and Rengarajan G 1998 Aspects of high frequency acoustic sounding — examples from applications of the BOKU mini-SODAR;Proceedings of the 9th international symposium on acoustic remote sensing and associated techniques of the atmosphere and oceans ISRAS’ 98, Vienna, Austria103 Google Scholar
  20. Mursch-Radlgruber E and Wolfe D E 1993 Mobile high frequency mini-SODAR and it’s potential for boundary layer studies;Appl. Phys. B 57 57–63Google Scholar
  21. Mursch-Radlgruber E, Gregg D W, King C W, Ruifieux D, Sharp K A K, Wolfe D E, Neff W D 1993 NOAA’s portable high frequency Mini Sodar Design and first results;Int. J Remote Sensing 25 (2) 325–332.Google Scholar
  22. Mursch-Radlgruber E, Rengarajan G, Mursch-Radlgruber G, 1996 Discussion of multi-beam multi-frequency mini-SODAR operation;8th Int. Symposium on Acoustic Remote Sensing and Associated Techniques of the Atmosphere and Oceans ISARS ’96. 27–31 May, (ed) M A Kallistratova, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
  23. Mursch-Radlgruber E, Leclerc M Y, Prabha T, Karipot A, Gepp W 2000 Evaluation of Multi-Beam Multi Frequency Sodar Techniques for Turbulence Measurements;10th Symposium on Acoustic Remote Sensing, Auckland, NZ, 26th Nov—1st Dec.Google Scholar
  24. Mursch-Radlgruber E, Neff W D, Rengarajan G, Russel C 1997 Shallow mixed layer during drainage condition along the front range;12th AMS Symposium on Boundary Layer and Turbulence, July 28–August 1, Vancouver, Canada. Poster.Google Scholar
  25. Murthy B S, Dharmaraj T, Vernekar K G 1996 SODAR observations of the nocturnal boundary layer at Kharagpur, India;Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 81 201–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Narayana Rao D, Krishna Reddy K, Vijaya Kumar T R, Kishore P 1996 Wind climatology observed over Kalpakkam using Doppler sodar;Indian Journal of Radio & Space Physics,25(3)115 0367–8393Google Scholar
  27. Ogawa, Y, Ohara T, Wakamatsu S, Diosey P G and Uno I 1986 Observation of lake breeze penetration and subsequent development of the thermal internal boundary layer for the NANTICOKE II shoreline diffusion experiment;Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 35 207–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pearson R A, Carboni G and Brusasca G 1983 The sea breeze with mean flow,Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 109 809–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pielke R A 1974 A three-dimensional numerical model of the sea breezes over south Florida;Mon. Weather Rev. 102 115–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prabha T V, Anandakumar K, Venkatesan R and Somayaji K M 2000 Coastal Atmospheric Boundary Layer Experiment (CABLE-98);IGC-213 Report on site specific parameters. Health and Safety Division, IGCAR, Kalpakkam. (Available from L&IS, IGCAR, Kalpakkam, 603 102, India)Google Scholar
  31. Prakash J W, Ramachandran R, Nair K N, Gupta K S, Kunhikrishnan P K 1993 On the spectral behaviour of Atmospheric Boundary Layer parameters at Thumba, India;Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.,119 (509A), 187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rao D N, Ravi K S, Rao S V, Kumar T R, Murthy M J, Pasricha P K, Dutta H N, Reddy B M 1992 A qualitative study of wave motions in atmospheric boundary layer observed over Thirupati using SODAR;Indian Journal of Radio & Space Physics,21(2) 134–140Google Scholar
  33. Simpson J E 1987 Gravity Currents: In the environment and the laboratory; (John Wiley and Sons)Google Scholar
  34. Singal S P, Gera B S, Pahwa D R 1994 Application of sodar to air pollution meteorology;International Journal of Remote Sensing,15(2) 427–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Singal S P, Aggarwal S K, Pahwa D R, Gera B S 1986 Acoustic sounding: A tool for monitoring air pollution hazards;Indian Journal of Environmental Health,28(1), 48–53Google Scholar
  36. Smedman A and Ulf Hoegstroem 1983 Turbulent characteristics of a shallow convective internal boundary layer;Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 25 271–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Venkatesan R, Prabha T V and Somayaji K M 1999 Coastal Atmospheric Boundary Layer Experiment (CABLE-98);IGC-206, Report on Measurements and Data Presentation. Health and Safety Division, IGCAR, Kalpakkam. (Available from L&IS, IGCAR, Kalpakkam, 603 102, India)Google Scholar
  38. Weill A, Klapisz C, Strauss B, Baudin F, Jaupart C, Van Grundebeeck P and Goutorbe J P. 1980 Measuring Heat Flux and Structure Functions of Temperature Fluctuations with an Acoustic Doppler Sodar;J. Appl. Meteorol. 19 199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woülfelmaier F A, King C W, Mursch-Radlgruber E, Rengarajan G 1999 Mini-Sodar Observations of Drainage Flows in the Rocky Mountains;Theor. Appl. Climatol. 64 1/2, 83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thara V. Prabha
    • 1
  • R. Venkatesan
    • 2
  • Erich Mursch-Radlgruber
    • 3
  • G. Rengarajan
    • 3
  • N. Jayanthi
    • 4
  1. 1.Crop and Soil SciencesUniversity of GeorgiaGAUSA
  2. 2.Health and Safety Division, SHINE GroupIGCARKalpakkamIndia
  3. 3.Boundary Layer Meteorology DivisionInstitut fuer Meteorologie und Physik (IMP-BOKU)WienAustria
  4. 4.India Meteorological DepartmentChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations