Journal of Earth System Science

, Volume 113, Issue 1, pp 1–25 | Cite as

Physical properties of aerosols at Maitri, Antarctica

  • C. G. Deshpande
  • A. K. Kamra


Measurements of the submicron aerosol size distribution made at the Indian Antarctic station, Maitri (70‡45′S, 11‡44′E) from January 10th to February 24th, 1997, are reported. Total aerosol concentrations normally range from 800 to 1200 particles cm−3 which are typical values for the coastal stations at Antarctica in summer. Aerosol size distributions are generally trimodal and open-ended with a peak between 75 and 133 nm and two minima at 42 and 420 nm. Size distributions remain almost similar for several hours or even days in absence of any meteorological disturbance. Total aerosol concentration increases by approximately an order of magnitude whenever a low pressure system passes over the station. Based on the evolution of aerosol size-distributions during such aerosol enhancement periods, three types of cases have been identified. The nucleation mode in all three cases has been suggested to result from the photochemical conversion of the DMS emissions transported either by the marine air or by the air from the ice-melt regions around Maitri. Subsidence of midtropospheric air during the weakening of radiative inversion is suggested as a possible source of the nucleation mode particles in the third case. Growth of the nucleation mode particles by condensation, coagulation and/or by cloud processes has been suggested to be responsible for other modes in size distributions.


Antarctic aerosols coastal aerosols aerosol size distribution aerosols transport with polar lows Maitri aerosols 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bates T S, Kapustin V N, Quinn P K, Covert D S, Coffman D J, Mari C, Durkee P A, DeBruyn W and Saltzman E 1998 Processes controlling the distribution of aerosol particles in the lower marine boundary layer during the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE-1);J. Geophys. Res. 103 16,369–16,384Google Scholar
  2. Bigg E K 1980 Comparison of aerosol at four base-line atmospheric monitoring stations;J. Appl. Meteorol. 19 521–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigg E K, Gras J L and Evans C 1984 Origins of Aitken particles in remote regions of the southern hemisphere;J. Atmos. Chem. 1 203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bigg E K, Leek C and Nilsson E D 2001 Sudden changes in aerosol and gas concentrations in the central Arctic marine boundary layer: Causes and consequences;J. Geophys. Res. 106 32,167–32,185Google Scholar
  5. Bourke W, Hart T, Steinle P, Seaman R, Embery G, Naughton M and Rikus L 1995 Evolution of the bureau of meteorology's global assimilation and prediction system, Part 2: resolution enchancements and case studies;Aust. Met. Mag. 44 19–40Google Scholar
  6. Bourke W, Embery G, Harris B, Le T, Naughton M, Paevere J, Rikus L L, Seaman R, Steinle P, Sun Z and Xiao Y 1999 Global assimilation and prediction in the bureau of meteorology; Eleventh Annual BMRC Modelling Workshop, 9–11 November 1999 BMRC Research Report no. 75, Bureau of Meteorology Research Centre, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  7. Cadle R D, Fischer W H, Frank E R and Lodge J P Jr. 1968 Particles in the Antarctic atmosphere;J. Atmos. Sci. 25 100–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charlson R J, Lovelock J E, Anreae M O and Warren S G 1987 Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulfer, cloud albedo and climate;Nature 326 655–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clarke A D, Varner J L, Eisele F, Mauldin R L, Tanner D, Litchy M 1998 Particle production in the remote marine atmosphere: cloud outflow and subsidence during ACE-1;J. Geophys. Res. 103 16, 397–16.Google Scholar
  10. Cobb W E and Wells H J 1970 The electrical conductivity of oceanic air and its correlation to global atmospheric pollution;J. Atmos. Sci. 27 814–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davison B, O'Dowd C, Hewitt C N, Smith M H, Harrison R M, Peel D A, Wolf E, Mulvaney R, Schwikowski M and Baltensperger U 1996 Dimethyl sulfide and its oxidation products in the atmosphere of the Atlantic and Southern Oceans;Atmos. Environ. 30 1895–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dhanorkar S and Kamra A K 1992 Relation between electrical conductivity and small ion in the presence of intermediate and large ions in the lower atmosphere;J. Geophys. Res. 97 20,345–20,360Google Scholar
  13. Draxler R R and Rolph G D 2003 HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website (; NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD.Google Scholar
  14. Fuchs N A 1964The mechanics of aerosols (Pergamon Press) p. 408Google Scholar
  15. Gras J L and Adriaansen A 1985 Concentration and size variation of condensation nuclei at Mawson, Antarctica;J. Atmos. Chem. 3 96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harvey M J, Fisher G W, Lechner I S, Issac P, Flower N E and Dick A L 1991 Summertime aerosol measurement in the Ross sea region of Antarctica;Atmos. Environ. 25A 569–580Google Scholar
  17. Hogan A W 1975 Antarctic aerosols;J. App. Met. 14 550–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hogan A W 1979 Meteorological transport of particulate material to the south polar plateau;J. Appl. Meteorol. 18 741–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoppel W A, Anderson R V and Willet J C 1986 Atmospheric electricity in the planetary boundary layer, In: The Earth's Electrical Environment, pp. 149–165, (Washington, D C.: National Academy Press)Google Scholar
  20. Hoppel W A, Frick G M, Larson R E 1986 Effect of non-precipitating clouds on the aerosol size distribution in the marine boundary layer;Geophys. Res. Lett. 13 125–128Google Scholar
  21. Hoppel W A, Frick G M, Fitzgerald J W and Larson R E 1994 Marine boundary layer measurements of new particle formation and the effect which non-precipitating clouds have on the aerosol size distribution;J. Geophys. Res. 99 14,442–14,459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ito T 1980 Observations of atmospheric aerosols at Syowa Station, Antarctica (in Japanese),Tenki Tokyo 27 13–24Google Scholar
  23. Ito T and Iwai K 1981 On the sudden increase in the concentration of Aitken particles in the Antarctic atmosphere;J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan 59 262–271Google Scholar
  24. Ito T 1982 On the size distribution of submicron aerosols in the Antarctic atmosphere;Antarctic Record no.76 1–19Google Scholar
  25. Ito T 1983 Study on properties and origin of aerosol particles in the Antarctic atmosphere (in Japanese, English abstract);Pap. Meteorol. Geophys. 34(3) 151–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ito T 1985 Study of background aerosols in the Antarctic troposphere;J. Atmos. Chem. 3 69–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ito T 1993 Size distribution of Antarctic submicron aerosols;Tellus 45B 145–159Google Scholar
  28. Iwai K 1979 Concentration of Aitken particles observed at Syawo station, Antarctica (in Japanese),Nankyoku Shiryo 67 172–179Google Scholar
  29. Jaenicke R and Stingl J 1984 Aitken particle size distribution in Antarctica; In:Proceedings of International Conference on Aerosols and Ice Nuclei, Budapest, (Budapest, Hungary: University of Budapest Press)Google Scholar
  30. Jaenicke R, Dreiling V, Lehmann E, Koutsenoguii P K and Stingl J 1992 Condensation nuclei at the German Antarctic Station ‘Georg von Neumayer’;Tellus 44B 311–317Google Scholar
  31. Jaenicke R and Matthias-Maser S 1992 Natural sources of atmospheric aerosol particles, In: Fifth International Conference on Precipitation, Scavenging and Atmos., Surface Exchange ProcessesGoogle Scholar
  32. Kamra A K and Deshpande C G 1995 Possible secular change and land-to-ocean extension of air pollution from measurements of atmospheric electrical conductivity over the Bay of Bengal;J. Geophys. Res. 100 7105–7110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kamra A K, Murugavel P, Pawar S D and Gopalakrishnan V 2001 Background aerosol concentration derived from the atmospheric electric conductivity measurements made over the Indian Ocean during INDOEX;J. Geophys. Res. 106 28,643–28,651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lal M and Kapoor R K 1989 Certain meteorological features of submicron aerosols at Schirmacher oasis, East Antarctica;Atmos. Environ. 23 803–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu B Y H and Pui D Y H 1975 On the performance of the electrical aerosol analyzer;J. Aerosol Science 6 249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Misaki M, Ikegami K and Kanazawa J 1972 Atmospheric electrical conductivity measurements in Pacific Ocean exploring the background level of global pollution;J. Meteorol. Soc., Jpn. 50 497–500Google Scholar
  37. O'Dowd C D, Geever M, Hill M K, Smith M H and Jennings S G 1998 New particle formation: Nucleation rates and spatial scales in the clean marine coastal environments;Geophys. Res. Lett. 25 1661–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O'Dowd C D, MeFiggans G, Creasey D J, Pirjola L, Hoell C, Smith M H, Allan B J, Plane J M C, Heard D E, Lee J D, Pilling M H and Kulmala M 1999 On the photochemical production of new particles in coastal boundary layer;Geophys. Res. Lett 26 1707–1710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Radke L F and Lyons J H 1982 Airborne measurements of particles in Antarctica; In: 2nd symposium on composition of the non-urban troposphere, pp 159–163,American Met. Soc. Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Ramteke D S, Ghode R, Mulay R D and Ghosh T K 1997 Characterisation of selective soil and sediment samples around Indian stations Maitri in Schirmacher Oasis, East Antarctica, Scientific Report Thirteenth Indian Expedition to Antarctica;Tech. Publ. No. 11, Dept. of Ocean Development, 313-321Google Scholar
  41. Rolph G D 2003 Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem (READY) Website (;NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD.Google Scholar
  42. Shaw G E 1979 Consideration on the origin and properties of the Antarctic aerosol;Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 17 1983–1998Google Scholar
  43. Shaw G E 1986 On the physical properties of aerosol at Ross island, Antarctica;J. Aerosol. Sci. 17 937–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shaw G E 1988 Antarctic aerosols: A review;Rev. Geophys. 26 89–112Google Scholar
  45. Voskresenskii A I 1968 Condensation nuclei in the Mirny region;Sov. Antark. Eksped. Trudy 38 149–198Google Scholar
  46. Weber R J, McMurry P H, Mauldin L, Tanner D V, Eiscle F L, Brechtel F J, Kreidenweis S M, Kok G L, Schillawski R D and Bauimgardener D 1998 A study of new particle formation and growth involving biogenic and trace gas spices measured during ACE 1;J. Geophys. Res. 103 16,385–16,396Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Academy of Sciences 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. G. Deshpande
    • 1
  • A. K. Kamra
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Tropical MeteorologyPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations