Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them

  • Dani Rodrik
Articles

Abstract

This article opens with a discussion of the types of institutions that allow markets to perform adequately. While we can identify in broad terms what these are, there is no unique mapping between markets and the non-market institutions that underpin them. The paper emphasizes the importance of “local knowledge”, and argues that a strategy of institution building must not over-emphasize best-practice “blueprints” at the expense of experimentation. Participatory political systems are the most effective ones for processing and aggregating local knowledge. Democracy is a meta-institution for building good institutions. A range of evidence indicates that participatory democracies enable higher-quality growth.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alesina, Alberto and Allan Drazen. 1991. “Why Are Stabilizations Delayed”?American Economic Review, 81(5): 1170–1188.Google Scholar
  2. Amsden, Alice H.. 1989.Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barro, Robert. 1996. “Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study”. NBER Working Paper no. 5698, August.Google Scholar
  4. Bordo, Michael D., Claudia Goldin, and Eugene N. White, Eds. 1998.The Defining Moment: The Great Depression and the American Economy in the Twentieth Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chandra, Siddharth. 1998. “On Pillars of Democracy and Economic Growth”. Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh, February.Google Scholar
  6. Chowhurie-Aziz, Monali. 1997. “Political Openness and Economic Performance”. Unpublished paper, University of Minnesota, January.Google Scholar
  7. Evans, Peter. 1995.Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hall, Robert E. and Charles I. Jones. 1999. “Why Do Some Countries Produce Much More Output per Worker than Others”?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(1): 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hausmann, Ricardo and Michael Gavin. 1996.Securing Stability and Growth in a Shock Prone Region: The Policy Challenge for Latin America. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. Helliwell, John. 1994. Empirical Linkages Between Democracy and Economic Growth.British Journal of Political Science 24: 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoff, Karla and Joseph E. Stiglitz. 1999. Modern Economic Theory and Development. World Bank, October.Google Scholar
  12. Isham, Jonathan, Daniel Kaufmann and Lant Pritchett. 1997. Civil Liberties, Democracy, and the Performance of Government Projects.The World Bank Economic Review, May: 219–42.Google Scholar
  13. Jacoby, Sanford M. 1998. Risk and the Labor Market: Societal Past as Economic Prologue. Institute of Industrial Relations, UCLA.Google Scholar
  14. Jaggers, K. and T.R. Gurr. 1995. “Tracking Democracy’s Third Wave with Polity III Data”.Journal of Peace Research 32: 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, Simon and Andrei Shleifer. 1999.Coase v. the Coasians: The Regulation and Development of Securities Markets in Poland and the Czech Republic. MIT and Harvard.Google Scholar
  16. Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay and Pablo Zoido-Lobation. 1999. “Governance Matters” Unpublished paper, The World Bank.Google Scholar
  17. Knack, Stephen and Philip Keefer. 1995. “Institutions and Economic Performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures”Economics & Politics (November): 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Knack, Stephen and Philip Keefer. 1996. “Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation”. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  19. Lau, Lawrence J., Yingyi Qian and Gerard Roland. 1997.Reform Without Losers: An Interpretation of China’s Dual-Track Approach to Transition.Google Scholar
  20. Lin, Justin Yifu and Jeffrey B. Nugent. 1995. “Institutions and Economic Development” in J. Behrman and T.N. Srinivasan eds..Handbook of Economic Development, vol. 3A, North-Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  21. Meade, J.E., et al. 1961. The Economics and Social Structure of Mauritius—Report, to the Government of Mauritius. London: Methuen and Co.Google Scholar
  22. Miles, William F.S. 1999. “The Mauritius Enigma”.Journal of Democracy, 10(2): 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. North, Douglass C. and R. Thomas 1973.The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. North, Douglass C. and Barry Weingast. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth Century England”.Journal of Economic History, XLIX: 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pritchett, Lant. 1997. “Economic Growth: Hills, Plains, Mountains, Plateaus and Cliffs”. Unpublished paper, World Bank.Google Scholar
  26. Przeworski, Adam and Fernando Limongi. 1993. “Political Regimes and Economic Growth.”The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Summer: 51–69.Google Scholar
  27. Qian, Yingyi, Gerard Roland and Chenggang Xu. 1999. “Coordinating Changes in M-Form and U-Form Organizations”. Paper for the Nobel Symposium.Google Scholar
  28. Quinn, Dennis P. and John T. Woolley. 1998.Democracy and National Economic Performance: The Search for Stability. School of Business, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  29. Rodrik, Dani. 1995. “Getting Interventions Right: How South Korea and Taiwan Grew Rich”.Economic Policy 20.Google Scholar
  30. Rodrik, Dani. 1996. “Understanding Economic Policy Reform”.Journal of Economic Literature, March: 9–41.Google Scholar
  31. Rodrik, Dani. 1997. “Democracy and Economic Performance” Unpublished paper, December.Google Scholar
  32. Rodrik, Dani. 1998. “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?”Journal of Political Economy, 106(5): 997–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rodrik, Dani. 1999a.,The New Global Economy and Developing Countries: Making Openness Work. Overseas Development Council, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  34. Rodrik, Dani. 1999b. “Democracies, Pay Higher Wages.”Quarterly Journal of Economics, August.Google Scholar
  35. Rodrik, Dani. 1999c. “Where Did All the Growth Go? External Shocks, Social Conflict, and Growth Collapses”Journal of Economic Growth, 4(4).Google Scholar
  36. Rodrik, Dani. 1999d. “Why Is There So Much Economic Insecurity in Latin America?” Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  37. Sachs, Jeffrey D. and Wing Thye Woo. Forthcoming. “Understanding China’s Economic Performance”.Journal of Policy Reform. Google Scholar
  38. Sah, Raaj K.. 1991 “Fallibility in Human Organizations and Political Systems”.Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2): 67–88.Google Scholar
  39. Tavares, Jose and Romain Wacziarg. 1996.How Democracy Fosters Growth. Harvard University.Google Scholar
  40. Temple, Jonathan and Paul Johnson. 1998. “Social Capability and Economic Growth”.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 113(3): 965–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tornell, Aaron and Philip R. Lane. 1999. “The Voracity Effect”.American Economic Review, 89(1): 22–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1998.Democracy Realized: The Progressive Alternative. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  43. Wellisz, Stanislaw and Philippe Lam Shin Saw. 1993. “Mauritius” In Ronald Findlay and Stanislaw Wellisz eds.,The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity, and Growth: Five Open Economies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Williamson, John Ed. 1994.The Political Economy of Policy Reform, Washington, D.C., Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dani Rodrik

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations