, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 551–559 | Cite as

Mangrove encroachment of salt marsh in Western Port Bay, Victoria: The role of sedimentation, subsidence, and sea level rise



Surface elevation tables, feldspar marker horizons, and210Pb analysis of core profiles were implemented at four sites in Western Port Bay, Victoria, Australia, to provide information on the role of sedimentation, subsidence or compaction, and enhanced sea-level rise in contributing to salt marsh decline. Photogrammetric surveys indicate that the rate of salt marsh decline that is attributable to mangrove encroachment is lower in Western Port Bay than in comparable sites in New South Wales. Differences in the rate of mangrove encroachment at Western Port Bay may be attributed to the inverse relationship found between the degree of mangrove encroachment and surface elevation increase. While sedimentation contributes to surface elevation changes, surface elevation is not solely explained by sedimentation; factors including autocompaction and changes in the water table also play a significant role in Western Port Bay. Historic sedimentation rates measured using210Pb dating techniques corresponded to contemporary sedimentation rates determined from feldspar marker horizons. Core sediment profiles show no change in sedimentation rates at three sites. A fourth site (French Island) was the only site that exhibited high rates of sedimentation, which appears to be related to local land-use changes in the area. All sites maintained their elevation with respect to sea level over the study period. Historic sedimentation exceeded sea-level rise for the past 32 yr, but it is difficult to determine the extent to which belowground processes affect surface elevation, causing deviations between surface elevation and sedimentation over longer periods.


Salt Marsh Surface Elevation Marsh Surface Sediment Accretion Marsh Elevation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Adam, P. 1990. Saltmarsh Ecology, 1st edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  2. Boumans, R. M. J. andJ. W. Day, Jr. 1993. High precision measurements of sediment elevation in shallow coastal areas using a sedimentation-erosion table.Estuaries 16:375–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cahoon, D. R., J. W. Day, andD. J. Reed. 1999. The influence of surface and shallow subsurface soil processes on wetland elevation: A synthesis.Current Topics in Wetland Biogeochemistry 3:72–88.Google Scholar
  4. Cahoon, D. R., J. French, T. Spencer, D. J. Reed, andI. Moller. 2000. Vertical accretion versus elevational adjustment in U. K. saltmarshes: An evaluation of alternativo methodologies, p. 223–238.In K. Pye and J. R. L. Allen (eds.) Coastal and Estuarine Environments: Sedimentology, Geomorphology, and Geoarchaeology. Special Publications 175. Geological Society, London, U.K.Google Scholar
  5. Cahoon, D. R. andJ. C. Lynch. 1997. Vertical accrction and shallow subsidence in Southwestern Florida, U.S.A..Mangroves and Salt Marshes 1:173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cahoon, D. R., J. C. Lynch, H. Phillippe, R. Boumans, B. C. Perez, B. Segura, andJ. W. Day. 2002a. High precision measurements of wetland sediment elevation: I. Tecent improvements to the sedimentation-erosion table.Journal of Sedimentary Research 72:730–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cahoon, D. R., J. C. Lynch, T. J. Smith, In, K. R. T. Whelan, G. H. Anderson, and C. Walker. 2002b. Do surface and groundwater fluctuations influence sediment surface elevation in the coastal Everglades wetlands?, p. 29–30.In A. E. Torres, A. L. Higer, H. S. Henkel, P. R. Mixson, V. R. Eggleston, T. L. Embry, and G. Clement (eds.), U.S. Geological Survey Greater Everglades Science Program: 2002 Biennial Report. U.S. Geological Survey Open File 03–54, Palm Harbor, Florida.Google Scholar
  8. Cahoon, D. R., D. J. Reed, andJ. W. Day. 1995. Estimating shallow subsidence in microtidal salt marshes of the southeastern United States: Kaye and Barghoorn revisited.Marine Geology 128:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chapman, R. 1974. Western Port region conservation survey: A report to the Western Port Region Planning Authority. Conservation Council of Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, P. J. andW. G. Allaway. 1993. The regeneration niche of the grey mangrove (Avicennia marina): Effects of salinity, light, and sediment factors on establishment, growth and survival in the field.Oecologia 93:548–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clough, B. F. andP. M. Attiwill. 1975. Nutrient cycling in a community ofAvicenia marina in a temperate region of Australia, p. 137–146.In G. E. Walsh, S. C. Snedaker, and H. J. Teas (eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biology and Management of Mangroves, Volume 1. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
  12. Edwards, R. J. andB. P. Horton. 2000. Reconstructing relative sea-level change using U.K. salt-marsh formainifera.Marine Geology 169:41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hancock, G. J., J. M. Olley, and P. J. Wallbrink, 2001. Sediment transport and accumulation in Western Port. CSIRO Land and Water technical report 47/01, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Hancock, G. J., I. T. Webster, P. F. Ford, andW. S. Moore. 2000. Using Ra isotopes to examine transport processes controlling benthic fluxes into a shallow estuarine lagoon.Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 64:3685–3699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Horton, B. P., P. Larcombe, S. A. Woodroffe, J. E. Whittaker, M. R. Wright, andC. Wynn. 2003. Contemporary foraminiferal distributions of a mangrove environment, Great Barrier Reef coastline, Australia: Implications of sea-level reconstructions.Marine Geology 198:225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mckee, K. L. and J. E. Rooth. 2003. Impacts of elevated CO2 and nutrients on biomass production and allocation in a mangrovesaltmarsh community.In Proceedings of Society of Wetland Scientists 24th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana.Google Scholar
  17. McMillan, C. 1975. Adaptive differentiation to chilling in mangrove populations, p. 62–70.In G. E. Walsh, S. C. Snedaker, and H. J. Teas (eds.) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Biology and Management of Mangroves, Volume I. University of Florida. Cainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
  18. Mitchell, W., J. Chittleborough, B. Ronal, andG. W. Lennon. 2000. Sea level rise in Australia and the Pacific.Climate Change Newsleter 12:7–10.Google Scholar
  19. Paquette, C., K. L. Sundberg, R. M. J. Boumans, andG. L. Chmura. 2004. Changes in saltmarsh surface elevation due to variability in evapotranspiration and tidal flooding.Estuaries 27:70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Patterson, S., K. L. McKee, andI. A. Mendelssohn. 1997. Effects of tidal inundation and predation onAvicennia germinans seedling establishment and survival in a sub-tropical mangal/salt marsh community.Mangroves and Salt Marshes 1:103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Patterson, C. S., I. A. Mendelssohn, andE. M. Swenson. 1993. Growth and survival ofAvicennia germinans seedlings in a mangal salt marsh community in Louisiana, U.S.A..Journal of Coastal Research 9:801–810.Google Scholar
  22. Rogers, K., N. Saintilan, and D. Cahoon. in press. Surface elevation dynamics in a regenerating mangrove forest at Homebush Bay, Australia.Wetlands Ecology and Management.Google Scholar
  23. Rogers, K., N. Saintilan, and K. M. Wilton. 2002. Monitoring the loss of saltmarsh in South East Australia. Report prepared for Environment Australia by the Centre for Environmental Restoration and Stewardship, Australian Catholic University National, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  24. Rooth, J. E. andJ. C. Stevenson. 2000. Sediment deposition inPhragmites australis communities: Implications for coastal areas threatened by rising sea-level.Wetlands Ecology and Management 8:173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saenger, P. andJ. Moverley. 1985. Vegetative phenology of mangroves along the Queensland coastline.Proceedings of the Ecological Society of Australia 13:257–265.Google Scholar
  26. Saintilan, N. andR. J. Williams. 1999. Mangrove transgression into saltmarsh environments in south-east Australia.Global Ecology and Biogeography 8:117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saintilan, N. andR. J. Williams. 2000. Short note: The decline of saltmarsh in southeast Australia: Results of recent surveys.Wetlands (Australia) 18:49–54.Google Scholar
  28. Wilk, R. R., J. B. Keene, and M. A. H. Marden. 1979. Sediment characteristics in the embayment head of Western Port: The impact of swamp drainage and erosion on sedimentation and seagrass distribution Ministry of Conservation, Environmental Studies Series Publication No. 24. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Wilton, K. M. and N. Saintilan. 2000. Protocols for magrove and saltmarsh habital mapping. Australian Catholic University National Coastal Wetlands Unit Technical Report 2000/01, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  30. Zann, L. P. 1997. Our Sea, Our Future: Major findings of the State of the Marine Environment Report for Australia. Ocean Reseur 2000, Department of Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Arts and SciencesAustralian Catholic UniversityNorth SydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Environment DivisionAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB1MenaiAustralia

Personalised recommendations