Aerobiologia

, 13:259 | Cite as

A comparative biochemical study of conifer pollen allergens

  • Mary E. Pettyjohn
  • Estelle Levetin
Original Articles

Abstract

In the order Coniferales, only the family Cupressaceae is regarded as being a significant source of airborne allergens, withJuniperus ashei characterized as the most significat aeroallergen. Pollen of the closely related speciesJ. virginiana has been shown to cross-react withJ. ashei pollen, however,J. virginiana pollen is not considered an important aeroallergen. Although there have been several reports of allergies toPinus pollen, the pollen of this genus is regarded as hypoallergenic. Our previous studies have shown that pollen extracts ofJ. ashei, J. virginiana, J. pinchotii, Cupressus macrocarpa, Pinus echinata andP. taeda all contained several proteins with the same molecular weights including the reported allergen ofJ. ashei. The present study compared the biochemistry ofJ. ashei, J. virginiana andP. echinata pollen. A time course experiment ofJ. ashei, J. virginiana andP. echinata showed thatJ. ashei released a greater quantity of protein within the first minute of moistening. SDS-PAGE analyses showed that the reported allergen ofJ. ashei pollen extracts was released in large quantities within the first minute of extraction. It was also determined that individual pollen grains ofP. echinata contained a greater quantity of protein than the pollen ofJ. ashei andJ. virginiana, but due to the large size of pine pollen there was less protein per gram of pollen. Lipid analysis of these three taxa showed that the pollen ofP. echinata contained more lipid per grain and per gram of pollen. Results indicate that the rapid release of the reported allergen fromJ. ashei pollen contributes to the allergenicity of this species compared to bothJ. virginiana andP. echinata.

Keywords

Conifer pollen allergens Juniperus ashei Juniperus virginiana Pinus Allergen release 

References

  1. Accorsi CA, Mazzanti MAB, Forlani L, Rivasi F. Pollen grains in human cytology. Grana 1991;30:102–8.Google Scholar
  2. Adams RP. Juniperus. In: Flora of North America Committee, editors. Flora of North America. Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms, vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993:412–20.Google Scholar
  3. Armentia A, Quintero A, Fernandiz-Garcia A, Salvador J, Martin-Santos JM. Allergy to pine pollen and pinon nuts: a review of three cases. Ann Allergy 1990;64:49–53.Google Scholar
  4. Baranuik JN, Esch RE, Buckley CE. III Pollen grain column chromatography: quantitation and biochemical analysis of ragweedpollen solutes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;81:1126–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black JH. Cedar hayfever. J. Allergy 1929;56:295.Google Scholar
  6. Budens RD, Stasny P, Sullivan TJ. Studies of immunochemistry and immunogenetics of mountain cedar allergy (abstract). J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;83:294.Google Scholar
  7. Chapman JA, Williams S. Aeroallergens of the Southeast Missouri area: a report of skin test frequencies and air sampling data. Ann Allergy 1984;52:411–8.Google Scholar
  8. Cornford CA, Fountain DW, Burr RG. IgE-binding proteins from pine (Pinus radiate D. Don) pollen: evidence for cross-reactivity with ryegrass (Lolium perenne). Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1990;93:41–6.Google Scholar
  9. Dankaart WFJM, Smithuis LOMJ, Blaauw PJ, Spieksma FTHM. The appearance of pollen in the lower airways. Grana 1991;30:113–4.Google Scholar
  10. Farnham JE, Vaida GA. A new look at New England tree pollen. Proc New Eng Soc Allergy 1982;3:320–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farnham JE. A new look at conifer allergy (editorial). New Eng Reg Allergy Proc 1988;9:237–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fountain DW, Cornford CA. Aerobiology and allergenicity ofPinus radiate pollen in New Zealand. Grana 1991;30:71–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman GL. Pine pollen allergy in Northern Arizona. Ann Allergy 1993;70:491–4.Google Scholar
  14. Frølund L, Madsen F, Svendsen U, Weeks B. Reproducibility of standardized bronchial allergen provocation test. Allergy 1986;41:30–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goetz DW, Vaughn MP, Patterson WR, Reid MJ. Monoclonal antibody identification of epitopes shared by the major allergen and other glycoproteins of mountain cedar (MC) pollen (abstract). J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;83:252.Google Scholar
  16. Gross GN, Zimburean JM, Capra JD. Isolation and partial characterization of the allergen in mountain cedar pollen. Scand J Immunol 1978;8:437–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris MC, German DF. The incidence of pine pollen reactivity in an allergenic atopic population. Ann Allergy 1985;55:678–9.Google Scholar
  18. Hosen H. Allergy to pine pollen (letter). Ann Allergy 1990;64:480.Google Scholar
  19. Howlett BJ, Vithanage HIMV, Knox RB. Pollen antigens, allergens, and enzymes. In: Smith H., editors. Commentaries in Plant Science, vol. 2. Oxford, London: Pergamon, 1981:191–207.Google Scholar
  20. Kahn IS, Grothaus EM. Hay-fever and asthma due to red cedar. S Med J 1931;24:729–30.Google Scholar
  21. Kalliel JN, Settipane GA. Eastern pine sensitivity in New England. New Eng Reg Allergy Proc 1988;9:233–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kinnas JS. Ophthalmic lesions due to pine-flower pollen. Br J Ophthalmol 1971;55:714–5.Google Scholar
  23. Knox RB, Heslop-Harrison J. Pollen-wall proteins: the fate of intineheld antigens on the stigma in compatible and incompatible pollinations ofPhalaris tuberosa L. J Cell Sci 1971;9:239–51.Google Scholar
  24. Kral R.Pinus. In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee, editors. Flora of North America. Pteridophytes and Gymnosperms, vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993:373–98.Google Scholar
  25. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970;227:680–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Levetin E, Buck P. Hay fever plants in Oklahoma. Ann Allergy 1980;45:26–46.Google Scholar
  27. Levetin E, Buck P. Evidence of mountain cedar pollen in Tulsa. Ann Allergy 1986;56:295–9.Google Scholar
  28. Levetin E. A longitudinal study of Winter and early Spring tree pollen in Tulsa, OK. 1997;14(1):1–8.Google Scholar
  29. Lewis WH, Imber WE. Allergy epidemiology in the St. Louis, Missouri, Area III. Trees Ann Allergy 1975;35:113–9.Google Scholar
  30. Lewis WH, Dixit AB, Zenger VE. Airborne and Allergenic Pollen of North America. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  31. Lewis WH, Dixit AB, Ward WA. Distribution and incidence of North America pollen aeroallergens. Am J Otolaryngol 1991;12:205–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Little EL. Atlas of United States Trees, vol. 1. Conifer and Important Hardwood, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1146. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office, 1971.Google Scholar
  33. Marsh DG, Belin L, Bruce CA, Lichtenstein LM, Hussain R. Rapidly released allergens from short ragweed pollen. I. Kinetics of release of known allergens in relation to biologic activity. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1981;67:206–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Michel FB, Marty JP, Quet L, Cour P. Penetration of inhaled pollen into the respiratory tract. Am Rev Resp Dis 1977;115:609–16.Google Scholar
  35. Montero, M.T., Alonso, E., Sainz, T., Allergens from rye pollen (Secale cereale) I Study of protein release by rye pollen during a 19-hour extraction process Allergen identification., Allergy, 1992;47:22–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Newmark FM, Itkin IH. Asthma due to pine pollen. Ann Allergy 1967;25:251–2.Google Scholar
  37. Ong EK, Singh MB, Knox RB. Aeroallergens of plant origin: molecular basis and aerobiological significance. Aerobiologia 1995;11:219–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pence HL, Mitchell DQ, Greely RL, Updegraff BR, Slefridge HA. Immunotherapy for mountain cedar pollinosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1976;58:39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pettyjohn ME. A Comparative Aerobiological, Biochemical, and Ultrastructural Study of Conifer Pollen Allergens. Master’s Thesis. The University of Tulsa. Tulsa, OK, 1996.Google Scholar
  40. Pettyjohn ME. Levetin E. Conifer pollen: is a reassessment in order? In: Milenberg M, Burge H, editors. Aerobiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1996:109–22.Google Scholar
  41. Proctor DF, Anderson I, Lundqvist G. Clearance of inhaled particles from the human nose. Arch Int Med 1973;131:132–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramirez DA. The natural history of mountain cedar pollinosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1984;73:88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rowe AH. Pine pollen allergy. J Allergy 1939;10:377–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwietz LA, Hylander RD, Whisman BA, Wakefield KJ, Goetz DW, Reid MJ. Cross-reactivity among conifer pollens defined by immunoblot and monoclonal antibodies (abstract). J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;83:253.Google Scholar
  45. Silvers WS, Ledoux RA, Dolen WK, Morrison MR, Nelson HS, Weber RW. Aerobiology of the Colorado Rockies: pollen count comparison between Vail and Denver, Colorado. Ann Allergy 1992;69:421–6.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor PE, Staff IA, Singh MB, Knox RB. Localization of the two major allergens in rye-grass pollen using specific monoclonal antibodies and quantitiative analysis of immunogold labelling. Histochem J 1994;26:392–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vrtala S, Grote M, Duchene M, vanRee R, Kraft D, Scheiner O, Valenta R. Properties of tree and grass pollen allergens: reinvestigation of the linkage between solubility and allergenicity. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1993;102:160–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walker IC. Frequent causes and treatment of seasonal hay-fever. Arch Int Med 1921;28:71–118.Google Scholar
  49. Weber RW, Nelson HS. Pollen allergens and their inter-relationships. Clin Rev Allergy 1985;3:291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wodehouse RP. Hayfever plants, 2nd ed. New York: Hafner, 1971.Google Scholar
  51. Yoo T-J, Spitz E, McGerity JL. Conifer pollen allergy: studies of immunogenicity of conifer pollens in rabbit and man. Ann Allergy 1975;34:87–93.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Published by Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary E. Pettyjohn
    • 1
  • Estelle Levetin
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Biological SciencesThe University of TulsaTulsaUSA

Personalised recommendations