Correlates of sexual dimorphism in primates: Ecological and size variables

  • Walter Leutenegger
  • James Cheverud


The effects of a series of ecological and size factors on the degree of sexual dimorphism in body weight and canine size were studied among subsets of 70 primate species. Variation in body-weight dimorphism can be almost entirely attributed to body weight (83% of variance R2 of weight dimorphism). Much smaller amounts of the variation can be attributed to mating system (R2 =6.8%,polygynous species being more dimorphic than monogamous ones) and diet (R2 = 2.5%,frugivorous species being more dimorphic than folivorous ones). Habitat (arboreal vs. terrestrial) and activity rhythm (nocturnal vs. diurnal) have only an indirect effect on weight dimorphism. Variation in canine-size dimorphism can be explained in terms of canine size (R2 =49%),activity rhythm (R2 = 20%,diurnal species being more dimorphic than nocturnal ones), and mating system (R2 = 10%).Habitat and diet do not play a significant role in canine-size dimorphism. The unexpectedly high contribution of size to sexual dimorphism coupled with the observation of increased sexual dimorphism with increased size leads us to formulate a new selection model for the evolution of sexual dimorphism. We suggest that if there is selection for size increase, whatever its cause, directional selection in both males and females will lead to an increase in sexual dimorphism based on differences in genetic variance between the sexes. Sexual selection, resource division between the sexes, or lopsided reproductive selection need not play a role in such a model.

Key words

primates sexual dimorphism ecological variability body size canine size 


  1. Alexander, R. D., Hoogland, J. L., Howard, R. D., Noonan, K. M., and Sherman, P. W. (1979). Sexual dimorphism and breeding systems in pinnipeds, ungulates, primates and humans. In Chagnon, N. A., and Irons, W. (eds.),Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behavior: An Anthropological Perspective, Duxbury Press, North Scituate, Mass., pp. 402–435.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D., and Lydic, R. (1977). On the effect of using ratios in the analysis of variance.Biobehav. Rev. 1: 225–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atchley, W., Gaskins, C., and Anderson, D. (1976). Statistical properties of ratios. I. Empirical results.Syst. Zool. 25: 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bird, M., and Schaffer, H. (1972). A study of the genetic basis of sexual dimorphism for wing length inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 72: 475–487.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Blalock, H. (1972).Social Statistics, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1977). Some aspects of intraspecific variation in feeding and ranging behavior in primates. In Clutton-Brock, T. H. (ed.),Primate Ecology, Academic Press, London, pp. 539–556.Google Scholar
  7. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. (1977). Primate ecology and social organization.J. Zool. Lond. 183: 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock, T. H., and Harvey, P. H. (1978). Mammals, resources and reproductive strategies.Nature (Lond.) 273:191–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Harvey, P. H., and Rudder, B. (1977). Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates.Nature (Lond.) 269: 797–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crook, J. H. (1972). Sexual selection, dimorphism, and social organization in the primates. In Campbell, B. G. (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 231–281.Google Scholar
  11. Crook, J. H., and Gartlan, J. S. (1966). On the evolution of primate societies.Nature (Lond.) 210: 1200–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eisen, E., and Hanrahan, J. (1972). Selection for sexual dimorphism in body weight in mice.Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 25: 1015–1024.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenberg, J. F., Muckenhirn, N. A., and Rudran, R. (1972). The relation between ecology and social structure in primates.Science 176: 863–874.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Falconer, D. (1960).An Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Roland Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Harvey, P. H., Kavanagh, M., and Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1978a). Sexual dimorphism in primate teeth.J. Zool. Lond. 276: 817–818.Google Scholar
  16. Harvey, P. H., Kavanagh, M., and Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1978b). Canine tooth size in female primates.Nature (Lond.) 276: 817–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huxley, J. (1932).Problems of Relative Growth, Dover, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Lande, R. (1980). Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters.Evolution 34: 292–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leutenegger, W. (1973). Maternal-fetal weight relationships in primates.Folia Primatol. 20: 280–293.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leutenegger, W. (1976). Metric variability in the anterior dentition of African colobines.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 45: 45–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leutenegger, W. (1978). Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body size and breeding system in primates.Nature (Lond.) 272: 610–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leutenegger, W. (1982). Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body weight and canine size in primates.Folia Primatol. 37: 163–176.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Leutenegger, W., and Kelly, J. T. (1977). Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral, and ecological correlates in anthropoid primates.Primates 18: 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mairana, V. (1982). Size and the degree of sexual dimorphism: lopsided reproductive selection. In Heisler, P., and Eastman, C. (eds.),Behavioral and Morphological Aspects of Sexual Dimorphism in Primates, Plenum Press, New York (in press).Google Scholar
  25. Rails, K. (1977). Sexual dimorphism in mammals: Avian models and unanswered questions.Am. Natur. 111: 917–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raup, D. M. (1972). Approaches to morphologic analysis. In Schopf, T. J. M. (ed.),Models in Paleobiology, Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 28–44.Google Scholar
  27. Rensch, B. (1950). Die AbhÄngigkeit der relativen Sexualdifferenz von der Körpergrösse.Bonn Zool. Beitr. 1: 58–69.Google Scholar
  28. Rensch, B. (1954).Neuere Probleme der Abstammungslehre, Enke, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  29. Rosenberger, A. L. (1977).Xenothrix and ceboid phylogeny.J. Hum. Evol. 6: 461–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rothenfluh, E. (1976).Ueberprüfung der Gewichtsangaben adulter Primaten im Vergleich zwischen Gefangenschafts- und Wildfangtieren, Diplomarbeit, UniversitÄt Zürich, Zürich.Google Scholar
  31. Selander, R. K. (1972). Sexual selection and dimorphism in birds. In Campbell, B. G. (ed.),Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 180–230.Google Scholar
  32. Swindler, D. R. (1976).Dentition of Living Primates, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  33. Wilson, E. O. (1975).Sociobiology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  34. Wood, B. A. (1976). The nature and basis of sexual dimorphism in the primate skeleton.J. Zool. Lond. 180: 15–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter Leutenegger
    • 1
  • James Cheverud
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of WisconsinMadison
  2. 2.Department of AnthropologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanston

Personalised recommendations