The American Sociologist

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 150–163 | Cite as

Sociology and the study of non-western societies

  • Harold E. Smith
Article
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

This paper attacks parochialism, ethnocentrism, and universalism in Western sociology. Conceptual limitations of the discipline are discussed in light of the emergent transnational scene. The author argues that new or revised analytical and theoretical concepts in the discipline are essential for sociological studies in non-Western societies. The professional role of the sociologist undertaking research in a non-Western society is discussed from the standpoint of international competency, language facility, and constraints and challenges. The fledgling movement toward cross-national and world sociology in the United States is indicated in developments such as dependency studies, world system theory, and the activities of the American Sociological Association.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abaza, Mona, and George Stauth. 1988. “Occidental Reason, Islamic Fundamentalism: A critique.”International Sociology 3:343–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abu-Lughod, Janet. 1987. Did the West Rise or Did the East Fall? Some Reflections from the Thirteenth Century World System.” Paper presented at American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
  3. Akiwowo, Akinsola A. 1980. “Sociology in Africa Today.”Current Sociology 28:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. _____. 1988. “Universalism and Indigenization in Sociological Theory.”International Sociology 3:155–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atal, Yogesh. 1981. “The Call for Indigenization.”International Social Science Journal 32:189–97.Google Scholar
  6. Bowers, C. A. 1983. “Linguistic Roots of Cultural Invasion in Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy.”Teachers College Record 84:935–53.Google Scholar
  7. Bradshaw, York W. 1987. “The Evolution of Development Theory Since World War II.” Paper presented at Midwest Sociology Society Annual Meeting, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. 1977. “The Consumption of Dependency Theory in the United States.”Latin American Research Review 12:7–24.Google Scholar
  9. Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, and E. Faletto. 1970.Dependencia y Desarrolo en America Latina. Siglo XXI Editores, Mexico. (Dependency and Development in Latin America. 21st Century Publishing Co.)Google Scholar
  10. Chirot, Daniel, and Thomas D. Hall. 1982. “World System Theory.”Annual Review of Sociology 8:81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deva, Indra. 1984. “A Sociological Perspective of Time and Creativity.”Impact of Science on Society 34:134–35, 197–202.Google Scholar
  12. Fahim, Hussein, and K. Helmer. 1980. “Indigenous Anthropology in Non-Western Countries: A Further Elaboration.”Current Anthropology 21:644–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frank, André Gunder. 1969.Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gareau, F.H. 1986. “The Third World Revolt against First World Social Science.”International Journal of Comparative Sociology 28:172–89.Google Scholar
  15. _____. 1988. “Another Type of Third World Dependency: The Social Sciences.”International Sociology 3:171–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glavanis, Kathy R. G., and P. M. Glavanis. 1983. “The Sociology of Agrarian Relations in the Middle East: The Persistence of Household Production.”Current Sociology 31:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gusfield, Joseph. 1966. “Tradition and Modernity in India: Misplaced Polarities in the Study of Social Change.”American Journal of Sociology 72:351–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hermassi, Elbaki. 1978. “Changing Patterns of Research on the Third World.”Annual Review of Sociology 4:239–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hill, Polly. 1985. “The Gullibility of Development Economists.”Anthropology Today. 1:10–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howry, Carla B. 1988. Written communication. May 16.Google Scholar
  21. Huntington, Samuel P. 1971. “The Change of Change: Modernization, Development, and Politics.”Comparative Politics 3:283–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hutton, Caroline, and Robin Cohen. 1975. “African Peasants and Resistance to Change: A Reconsideration of Sociological Approaches.” Pp. 105–30 inBeyound the Sociology of Development, edited by Ivar Oxaal et al. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  23. Jacobs, Norman. 1971. “Max Weber, the Theory of Asian Society, and the Study of Thailand.”Sociological Quarterly 12: 525ff.Google Scholar
  24. Kahl, Joseph. 1976.Modernization, Exploitation and Dependency in Latin America. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  25. Kaplan, Marcos. 1970.La Ciencia Politica Latino America en la Encrucijada. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
  26. Kelman, Herbert C. 1980. “Issues for Research in Developing Countries.”Current Anthropology 21:655–661.Google Scholar
  27. Kohn, Melvin. 1986.Footnotes. Washington DC: American Sociological Association 14(9).Google Scholar
  28. Koyano, Shogo. 1976. “Sociological Studies in Japan: Prewar and Contemporary Stages.”Current Sociology 24:1–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krishna, Daya. 1973. “Concepts of Political Development in American Political Science in the Sixties.” Pp. 25–46 in Foreign Values and Research on Southeast Asia, edited by J. Joseph Fichter. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lerner, Daniel. 1965.The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Levy, M.J. 1966.Modernization and the Structure of Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Madge, Charles. 1962. “Sociology in Asia: A One Day Conference.”British Journal of Sociology 13:95–127.Google Scholar
  33. Marini, Rui Mauro. 1972. “Brazilian Sub-imperialism.”Monthly Review. 9:14–24.Google Scholar
  34. Mazrui, Ali A. 1968. “From Social Darwinism to Current Theories of Modernization.”World Politics 21:69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Modelski, G. 1978. “The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation State.”Comparative Studies in Society and History 20:214–35.Google Scholar
  36. _____. 1982. “Long Cycles and the Strategy of the United States Economic Policy.” Pp. 97–116 inAmerica in a Changing World, edited by W. P. Avery and D. P. Rapkin. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  37. Moore, Wilbert E. 1966. “Global Sociology: The World as a Singular System.”American Journal of Sociology 61:475–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mugbane, Bernard, and James C. Paris. 1985. “On the Political Relevance of Anthropology.”Dialectical Anthropology 9:91–104.Google Scholar
  39. Mukherjee, Ramkrishna. 1977. “Trends in Indian Sociology.”Current Sociology 25:1–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mulder, Neils. 1983.Java-Thailand: A Comparative Perspective. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Gadjah Mada University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Namsirichai, Jurce, and V. Vichit-Vadakan. 1973. “American Values and Research on Thailand.” Pp. 82–89 inForeign Values and Research on Southeast Asia, edited by J. Fichter. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  42. O’Brien, Philip. 1975. “A Critique of Latin American Theories of Dependency.” Pp. 7–27 inBeyond the Sociology of Development, edited by Ivar Oxaal et al. London and Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  43. Peters, Emrys L. 1972. “Shifts in Power in a Lebanese Village.” Pp. 165–97 inRural Politics and Social Change in the Middle East, edited by Richard Antoun and Iliya Harik. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Pieris, Ralph. 1969. “The Implantation of Sociology in Asia.”International Social Science Journal 21:433–34.Google Scholar
  45. Portes, Alcjandro. 1973. “Perception of the United States Sociologist and Its Impact on Comparative Social Research.” Pp. 149–69 inComparative Social Research, edited by Michael Armer and Allen D. Grimshaw. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. _____. 1976. “On the Sociology of National Development: Theories and Issues.”American Journal of Sociology 82:55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prewitt, Kenneth. 1983. “Social Science and the Third World: Constraints on the United States.”International Social Science Journal 35:757–65.Google Scholar
  48. Robertson, Roland, and F. Lechner. 1985. “Modernization, Globalization and the Problem of Culture in World Systems Theory.”Theory, Culture and Society 2:103–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rogers, Everett. 1969.Modernization among Peasants. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  50. Rosenfeld, Henry. 1972. “An Interview and Critique of the Literature on Politics and Social Change.” Pp. 45–74 inRural Politics and Social Change in the Middle East, edited by Richard Antoun and Iliya Harik. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rostow, W. W. 1967.The Stages of Economic Growth. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sanda, A. Muyiwa. 1988. “In Defense of Indigenization in Sociological Theories.”International Sociology 3:189–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1972. “The Limits of Tradition versus Modernity as Categories of Explanation: The Case of Chinese Intellectuals.”Daedalus 101:71–88.Google Scholar
  54. Singer, Milton. 1971. “Beyond Tradition and Modernity in Madras.”Comparative Studies in Society and History 13:160–95.Google Scholar
  55. Singham, A. W. and N. L. Singham. 1973. “Cultural Domination and Political Subordination: Notes Towards a Theory of the Caribbean Political System.”Comparative Studies in Society and History 15:258–88.Google Scholar
  56. Sjoberg, Gideon, and Roger Nett. 1968.A Methodology for Social Research. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  57. Skocpol, Theda. 1977. “Wallerstein’s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique.”American Journal of Sociology 82:1,075–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith, Harold E. 1987. “Sociology in Thailand.”International Review of Modern Sociology 17:1–19.Google Scholar
  59. Stambouli, Fredj. 1982. “Sociology, Methodology and Action Research: The Case of the Arab Maghrab.”International Review of Modern Sociology 12:39–50.Google Scholar
  60. Szabo, Denis. 1981. “Société, Culture and Criminalité.”Criminologie. 14:8–29.Google Scholar
  61. Sztompka, Piotr. 1987. “Conceptual Frameworks in Comparative Inquiry: Divergent or Convergent?” Annual Meeting, American Sociological Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  62. Temu, P. E. 1975. “Reflections on the Role of Social Scientists in Africa.”International Social Science Journal 28:190–94.Google Scholar
  63. Thompson, William R. (ed.) 1983.Contending Approaches to World System Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  64. Tipps, Dean C. 1973. “Modernization Theory and the Comparative Study of Societies: A Critical Perspective.”Comparative Studies in Society and History 15:199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tiryakian, Edward A. 1986. “Sociology’s Great Leap Forward: The Challenge of Internationalization.”International Sociology 1:155–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Touraine, Alain. 1984. “The Waning Sociological Image of Social Life.” Pp. 33–44 inThe Global Crisis: Sociological Analyses and Responses edited by Edward A. Tiryakian. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
  67. Varna, V. P. 1981. “Talcott Parsons and the Behavioral Sciences.”The Indian Journal of Political Science, 42(2):1–13.Google Scholar
  68. Wallerstein, Immanuel M. 1974.The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  69. _____. 1979.The Capitalist World-Economy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Weber, Max. (1922) 1968.Economy and Society. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
  71. Willier, Richard. 1972. “Chinese Reflections on the Focus of Sociology.”Journal of the China Society 9:71–76.Google Scholar
  72. Wilson, Bryan. 1982.Religion in Sociological Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harold E. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyNorthern Illinois UniversityDeKalb

Personalised recommendations