Knowledge and Policy

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 31–63 | Cite as

North-South research partnership: Is collaboration possible between unequal partners?

  • Jacques F. Gaillard
Feature Articles


Scientific cooperation between the Industrialized Countries (ICs) and the Less Developed Countries (LDCs) has evolved greatly over the last three decades and has involved a number of varied mechanisms ranging from technical assistance to collaborative research partnerships. After a brief historical review of these mechanisms and of the conceptual debates around them, this paper considers the main programs that have been established during the last 10–15 years to promote North-South scientific collaborative partnership. One of the main problems encountered in the implementation of collaborative research programs relate to the asymmetry of the collaboration and the dominance of the partners in the North. While recognizing that conditions for success may differ depending on the main objectives of the collaboration, a list of ingredients for successful collaboration is proposed in the conclusion. This is based on the experience of the programs under review.


Host Country Research Capacity Research Partnership Scientific Cooperation Successful Collaboration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arvanitis, R., Belhadj Merzoug, T. Chatelin, Y., Gaillard, J., Keller, A-S, Meyer, J-B, Schlemmer B. and Waast, R. (1993).Indicateurs adaptés pour guider les stratégies d’un programme de coopération scientifique. Brussels: Commission des Communautés Européennes, DG XII.Google Scholar
  2. Asibey, A. (1992).Evaluation of the effects of Canadian and LDC research partnerships: An evaluation framework, IDRC (International Development Research Center) Evaluation Unit.Google Scholar
  3. Bean/Cowpea-CRSP. (1991).10 Years of collaborative research on beans and cowpeas. Training Report. East Lansing: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  4. Bhagavan, M.R. (1992).The SAREC model: Institutional cooperation and the strengthening of national research capacity in developing countries. Stockholm: SAREC (Swedish Agency for Research Cooperation with developing countries).Google Scholar
  5. Burris, R., Carr, C. and Krebs, W. (1985).An interim evaluation of the BOSTID research grants program. BOSTID (The Grants Program of the Board on Science and Technology for International Development of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences).Google Scholar
  6. Busch, L. and Lacy, W.B. (1983).Science, agriculture and the politics of research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chrusciel, W. (1988).An evaluation of the biomass resources and conversion module of the program in science and technology cooperation of the U.S. agency for international development. Center for Development Technology. Washington University in St. Louis.Google Scholar
  8. CRSP Council. (1991).The collaborative research programs: Scientific accomplishments and social impacts through joint research and training. Washington, D.C.: USAID/BIFADEC.Google Scholar
  9. DANIDA. (1992a).Desk study of DANIDA’s bilateral program for enhancement of research capacity in developing countries. Copenhagen: DANIDA (Danish International Development Assistance, Ministry of Foreign Affairs).Google Scholar
  10. DANIDA. (1992b).Evaluation report: The bilateral programme for enhancement of research capacity in developing countries. Copenhagen: DANIDA (op. cit.).Google Scholar
  11. ENRECA-NEWSLETTER No. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Danida programme for enhancement of research capacity in developing countries. 1990–1992. Copenhagen: DANIDA (op. cit.).Google Scholar
  12. Gaillard, J. (1987).Follow up of IFS grantees, 1974–1984. Paper presented at the Fifth IFS General Assembly, University of Panama, 8–14 November.Google Scholar
  13. Gaillard, J. (1990a). Les politiques d’aide à la recherche pour le développement du tiers monde: de l’assistance scientifique et technique à la coopération? ORSTOM, Paris.Cahiers des sciences humaines de l’ORSTOM (3):407–427.Google Scholar
  14. Gaillard, J. (1990b).The future role of the international foundation for science in a rapidly changing world. Stockholm: IFS (International Foundation for Science).Google Scholar
  15. Gaillard, J. (1991).Scientists in the Third World. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  16. Gaillard, J. and Busch, L. (1993). French and American agricultural science policies for the Third World.Science and Public Policy, London, Vol. 20, 4:222–34.Google Scholar
  17. Greene, M.P. (1991).Research for development: A grants program for the Third World. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.Google Scholar
  18. IDRC. (1987). Report of IDRC board review panel—Coop. March 17. Ottowa, Canada: IDRC (op. cit.).Google Scholar
  19. IDRC. (1991).Empowerment through knowledge. The strategy of the international development research center. November. Ottowa, Canada: IDRC (op. cit.)Google Scholar
  20. Lewis, J.P. (1987).External funding of development-related research: A survey of some major donors. Ottawa, Canada: IDRC (op. cit.).Google Scholar
  21. Mc Corkle, C.M. (Ed.) (1989).The social sciences in international agricultural research: Lessons from the CRSPs. Boulder: Lynne Reinner Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. NAS. (1975).Underexploited tropical plants with promising economic value. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  23. NAS. (1980).Firewood crops: Shrub and tree species for energy production. Vol. 1, Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  24. NAS. (1983).Firewood crops: shrub and tree species for energy production. Vol. 2, Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  25. NRC. (1991).Toward sustainability: A plan for collaborative research on agriculture and natural resource management. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  26. OECD. (1985).Scientific and technological cooperation with developing countries. Paris: OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development).Google Scholar
  27. Sagasti, F., Oldham, G., Vorauri, P., and Thiongane, P. (1983).Evaluation of the international foundation for science (IFS). Stockholm: IFS (op. cit.).Google Scholar
  28. SAREC. (1992).Annual Report 1991/1992. Stockholm: SAREC (op. cit.).Google Scholar
  29. Thulstrup, E.W. (1992).Improving the quality of research in developing country universities. Washington, D.C.: PHREE, The World Bank.Google Scholar
  30. UN. (1979).The Vienna program of action. New York: UN (United Nations).Google Scholar
  31. USAID. (1986). Panel report—national academy of sciences/board on science and technology for international development research grants program. Research Advisory Committee. Washington, D.C.: USAID.Google Scholar
  32. USAID. (1987). U.S.-Israel cooperative development research program: A partnership for international development. Washington, D.C.: USAID.Google Scholar
  33. USAID. (1990).Global research for sustainable food production. Washington, D.C.: USAID.Google Scholar
  34. USAID. (1992).Cutting-edge research for development: The A.I.D. program in science and technology cooperation. Washington, D.C.: USAID.Google Scholar
  35. Waast, R. (Ed.). (1992).Indicators and survey of the researchers: Science and technology for development, a European programme. Final Report, EVAK-5126 FR Contract. Brussels: Commission of European Communities, DG XII.Google Scholar
  36. Weiss, C. (1992).Lessons from eight “reforms commissions” on the organization of science and technology in U.S. Bilateral Development Assistance. New York: The Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology and Government, New York (pp. 10–1; 10–35).Google Scholar
  37. Yohe, J.M., Barnes-McConnell, P., Egna, H., Rowntree, J., Oxley, J., Hanson, R. and Kirksey, A. (1990).The collaborative research programs (CRSPs): 1978 to 1990. Paper prepared for the forum on sustainable agriculture and natural resource management, November 13–16. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacques F. Gaillard
    • 1
  1. 1.the Institut Français de Recherche Scientifique pour le Développement en Coopération (ORSTOM)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations