Advertisement

Estuaries

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1275–1290 | Cite as

Physical, biological, and management responses to variable freshwater flow into the San Francisco Estuary

  • W. J. KimmererEmail author
Article

Abstract

Freshwater flow is the principal cause of physical variability in estuaries and a focus of conflict in estuaries where a substantial fraction of the freshwater is diverted. Variation in freshwater flow can have many effects: inundation of flood plains, increase loading and advective transport of materials and organisms, dilution or mobilization of contaminants, compression of the estuarine salinity field and density gradient, increase in stratification, and decrease in residence time for water while increasing it for some particles and biota. In the San Francisco Estuary, freshwater flow is highly variable, and has been altered by shifts in seasonal patterns of river flow and increases in diversions from tidal and nontidal regions, entraining fish of several species of concern. Abundance or survival of several estuarine-dependent species also increases with freshwater outflow. These relationships to flow may be due to several potential mechanisms, each with its own locus and period of effectiveness, but no mechanism has been conclusively shown to underlie the flow relationship of any species. Several flow-based management actions were established in the mid-1990s, including a salinity standard based on these flow effects, as well as reductions in diversion pumping during critical periods for listed species of fish. The effectiveness of these actions has not been established. To make the salinity standard more effective and more applicable to future estuarine conditions will require investigation to determine the underlying mechanisms. Effects of entrainment at diversion facilities are more straightforward conceptually but difficult to quatify, and resolving these may require experimental manipulations of diversion flow.

Keywords

Management Response Increase Loading Substantial Fraction Listed Species Diversion Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Aleem, A. A. 1972. Effect of river outflow management on marine life.Marine Biology 15:200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alpine, A. E. andJ. E. Cloern. 1992. Trophic interactions and direct physical effects control phytoplankton biomass and production in an estuary.Limnology and Oceanography 37:946–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armor, C. andP. L. Herrgesell. 1985. Distribution and abundance of fishes in the San Francisco Bay estuary between 1980 and 1982.Hydrobiologia 129:211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arthur, J. F., M. D. Ball, andS. Y. Baughman. 1996. Summary of federal and state water project environmental impacts in the San Francisco Bay-Delta estuary, California, p. 445–495.In J. T. Hollibaugh (ed.), San Francisco Bay: The Ecosystem. AAAS, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, M. D. andJ. F. Arthur. 1979. Planktonic chlorophyll dynamics in the northern San Francisco Bay and Delta, p. 265–285.In T. J. Conomos (ed.), San Francisco Bay: The Urbanized Estuary. Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, W. A., W. J. Kimmerer, andJ. R. Burau. 2002. Plasticity in vertical migration by native and exotic fishes in a dynamic estuarine low-salinity zone.Limnology and Oceanography 47: 1496–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergamaschi, B. A., K. M. Kuivila, andM. S. Fram. 2001. Pesticides associated with suspended sediments entering San Francisco Bay following the first major storm of Water Year 1996.Estuaries 24:368–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boynton, W. R., W. M. Kemp, andC. W. Keefe. 1982. A comparative analysis of nutrients and other factors influencing estuarine phytoplankton, p. 69–90.In V. S. Kennedy (ed.), Estuarine Comparisons. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Brandes, P. L. andJ. S. McLain. 2001. Juvenile chinook salmon abundance, distribution, and survival in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary, p. 39–136.In R. L. Brown (ed.), Fish Bulletin 179: Contributions to the Biology of Central Valley Salmonids, Volume 2. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
  10. Breitburg, D. L.. 1988. Effects of turbidity on prey consumption by striped bass larvae.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 117:72–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, R., S. Greene, P. Coulston, andS. Barrow. 1996. An evaluation of the effectiveness of fish salvage operations at the intake to the California Aqueduct, 1979–1993, p. 497–518.In J. T. Hollibaugh (ed.), San Francisco Bay: The Ecosystem. AAAS, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  12. Christy, J. H. andS. G. Morgan. 1998. Estuarine immigration by crab postlarvae: Mechanisms, reliability and adaptive significance.Marine Ecology Progress Series 174:51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cloern, J. E. 1987. Turbidity as a control on phytoplankton biomass and productivity in estuaries.Continental Shelf Research 7:1367–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cloern, J. E., B. E. Cole, R. L. J. Wong, andA. E. Alpine. 1985. Temporal dynamics of estuarine phytoplankton: A case study of San Francisco Bay.Hydrobiologia 129:153–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cloern, J. E. andA. D. Jassby. 1994. Year-to-year fluctuation in the spring phytoplankton bloom in South San Francisco Bay: An example of ecological variability at the land-sea interface, p. 139–149.In J. H. Steele, T. M. Powell, and S. Levin (eds.), Ecological Time Series. Chapman Hall, London, U.K.Google Scholar
  16. Cloern, J. E. andF. H. Nichols. 1985. Temporal Dynamics of an Estuary: San Francisco Bay. Junk, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  17. Cole, B. E. andJ. E. Cloern. 1984. Significance of biomass and light availability to phytoplankton productivity in San Francisco Bay.Marine Ecology Progress Series 17:15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole, B. E. andJ. E. Cloern. 1987. An empirical model for estimating phytoplankton productivity in estuaries.Marine Ecology Progress Series 36:299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Conomos, T. J. 1979. San Francisco Bay: The Urbanized Estuary. Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  20. Conomos, T. J., D. H. Peterson, P. R. Carlson, andD. S. McCulloch. 1970. Movement of seabed drifters in the San Francisco Bay estuary and the adjacent Pacific Ocean: A preliminary report. Circular 637-B. U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California.Google Scholar
  21. Cook, L. andL. D. Buffaloe. 1998. Delta agricultural diversion evaluation summary report, 1993–1995. Technical Report 61. Interagency Ecological Program for the San Francisco Bay/Delta estuary, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
  22. Cronin, T. W. andR. B. Forward, Jr. 1979. Tidal vertical migration: An endogenous rhythm in estuarine crab larvae.Science 205:1020–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Day, Jr.,J. W., C. J. Madden, R. R. Twilley, R. F. Shaw, B. A. McKee, M. J. Dagg, D. L. Childers, R. C. Raynie, andL. J. Rouse. 1994. The influence of Atchafalaya River discharge on Fourleague Bay, Louisiana (USA), p. 151–160.In K. R. Dyer and R. J. Orth (eds.), Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  24. Department of Water Resources (DWR). 1994. California Central Valley Unimpaired Flow Data. California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
  25. Dettinger, M. D. andD. R. Cayan. 1995. Large-scale atmospheric forcing of recent trends toward early snowmelt runoff in California.Journal of Climate 8:606–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dodson, J.J., J.-C. Dauvin, R. Ingram, andB. D'Anglejan. 1989. Abundance of larval rainbow smelt (Osmerus mordax) in relation to the maximum turbidity zone and associated macroplanktonic fauna of the middle St. Lawrence estuary.Estuaries 12:66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Drinkwater, K. F. andK. T. Frank. 1994. Effects of river regulation and diversion on marine fish and invertebrates.Aquatic Conservation: Freshwater and Marine Ecosystems 4:135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dynesius, M. andC. Nilsson. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world.Science 266:753–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Emmett, R. L., S. L. Stone, S. A. Hinton, andM. E. Monaco. 1991. Distribution and abundance of fishes and invertebrates in west coast estuaries, Volume II: Species life history summaries. ELMR Report No. 8. NOAA/NOS Strategic Environmental Assessments Division, Rockville, Maryland.Google Scholar
  30. Festa, J. F. andD. V. Hansen. 1978. Turbidity maxima in partially mixed estuaries: A two-dimensional numerical model.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 7:347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fourqurean, J. W. andM. B. Robblee 1999. Florida Bay: A history of recent ecological changes.Estuaries 22:345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fox, J. P., T. R. Mongan, andW. J. Miller. 1990. Trends in freshwater inflow to San Francisco Bay from the Sacramento-San Joaqun Delta.Water Resources Bulletin 26:1–16.Google Scholar
  33. Frenette, J. J., W. F. Vincent, J. J. Dodson, andC. Lovejoy. 1995. Size-dependent variations in phytoplankton and protozoan community structure across the St. Lawrence River transition region.Marien Ecology Progress Series 120:99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gammelsrød, T. 1992. Variation in shrimp abundance on the Sofala Bank, Mozambique, and its relation to the Zambezi River runoff.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 35:91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Geyer, W. R. 1993. The importance of suppression of turbulence by stratification on the estuarine turbidity maximum.Estuaries 16:113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gregory, R. S. andC. D. Levings. 1998. Turbidity reduces predation on migrating juvenile Pacific salmon.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127:275–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harden Jones, F. R., G. P. Arnold, M. Greer Walker, andP. Scholes. 1979. Selective tidal stream transport and the migration of plaice (Pleuromectes platessa L.) in the southern North Sea.Journal du Conseil internationale pour Exploration du Mer 38:331–337.Google Scholar
  38. Herbold, B., A. D. Jassby, andP. B. Moyle. 1992. Status and trends report on aquatic resources in the San Francisco estuary. San Francisco Estuary Project. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Oakland, California.Google Scholar
  39. Herren, J. R. andS. S. Kawasaki. 2001. Inventory of water diversions in four geographic areas in California's Central Valley, p. 343–355.In R. L. Brown (ed.), Fish Bulletin 179: Contributions to the Biology of Central Valley Salmonids, Volume 2. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
  40. Hollibaugh, J. T. 1996. San Francisco Bay: The Ecosystem. Further Investigations into the Natural History of San Francisco Bay and Delta with Reference to the Influence of Man. American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  41. Hollibaugh, J. T. andP. S. Wong. 1996. Distribution and activity of bacterioplankton in San Francisco Bay, p. 263–288.In J. T. Hollibaugh (ed.), San Francisco Bay: The Ecosystem. AAAS. San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  42. Howarth, R. W., R. Schneider, andD. Swaney. 1996. Metabolism and organic carbon fluxes in the tidal freshwater Hudson River.Estuaries 19:848–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jassby, A. D. andJ. E. Cloern. 2000. Organic matter sources and rehabilitation of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (California, USA).Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystem 10:323–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jassby, A. D., J. E. Cloern, andB. E. Cole. 2002. Annualo primary production: Patterns and mechanisms of change in a nutrient-rich tidal estuary.Limnology and Oceanography 47:698–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jassby, A. D. W. J. Kimmerer, S. G. Monismith, C. Armor, J. E. Cloern, T. M. Powell, J. R. Schubel, andT. J. Vendlinski. 1995. Isohaline position as a habitat indicator for estuarine populations.Ecological Applications 5:272–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jaworski, N. A. 1981. Sources of nutrients and the scale of eutrophication problems in estuaries, p. 83–110.In B. J. Neilson and L. E. Cronin (eds.), Estuaries and Nutrients. Humana, Clifton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  47. Kaartvedt, S. andD. L. Aksnes. 1992. Does freshwater discharge cause mortality of fjord-living zooplankton.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 34:305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kemp, W. M., E. M. Smith, M. Marvin-DiPasquale, andW. R. Boynton. 1997. Organic carbon balance and net ecosystem metabolism in Chesapeake Bay.Marine Ecology Progress Series 150:229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kimmerer, W. J. 2002. Effects of freshwater flow on abundance of estuarine organisms: Physical effects or trophic linkages?Marine Ecology Progress Series 243:39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kimmerer, W. J., W. A. Bennett, andJ. R. Burau. 2002. Persistence of tidally-oriented vertical migration by zooplankton in a temperate estuary.Estuaries 25:359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kimmerer, W. J., J. R. Burau, andW. A. Bennett. 1998. Tidallyoriented vertical migration and position maintenance of zooplankton in a temperate estuary.Limnology and Oceanography 43:1697–1709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kimmerer, W. J., J. H. Cowan, Jr.,L. W. Miller, andK. A. Rose. 2000. Analysis of an estuarine striped bass population: Influence of density-dependent mortality between metamorphosis and recruitment.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 57:478–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kimmerer, W. J., J. H. Cowan, L. W. Miller, andK. A. Rose. 2001. Analysis of an estuarine striped bass population: Effects of environmental conditions during early life.Estuaries 24: 556–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kimmerer, W. J., E. Gartside, andJ. J. Orsi. 1994. Predation by an introduced clam as the probable cause of substantial declines in zooplankton in San Francisco Bay.Marine Ecology Progress Series 113:81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kimmerer, W. J. andJ. J. Orsi. 1996. Causes of long-term declines in zooplankton in the San Francisco Bay estuary since 1987, p.403–424.In J. T. Hollibaugh (ed.), San Francisco Bay: The Ecosystem. AAAS, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  56. Kimmerer, W. J. andJ. R. Schubel. 1994. Managing freshwater flows into San Francisco Bay using a salinity standard: Results of a workshop, p. 411–416.In K. R. Dyer and R. J. Orth (eds.), Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  57. Kjelson, M. A. andP. F. Raquel. 1981. The life history of fall run juvenile chinook salmon,Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary of California.Estuaries 4:285.Google Scholar
  58. Kohlhorst, D. W., L. W. Botsford, J. S. Brennan, andG. M. Caillet. 1991. Aspects of the structure and dynamics of an exploited central California population of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus), p. 277–293.In P. Williot (ed.), Acipenser. CEMAGREF Publ., Bordeaux, France.Google Scholar
  59. Krone, R. B. 1979. Sedimentation in the San Francisco Bay system, p. 85–95.In T. J. Conomos (ed.), San Francisco Bay: The Urbanized Estuary. Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  60. Kuivila, K. M. andC. G. Foe. 1995. Concentrations, transport and biological effects of dormant spray pesticides in the San Francisco estuary, California.Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 14:1141–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Laprise, R. andJ. J. Dodson. 1993. Nature of environmental variability experienced by benthic and pelagic animals in the St. Lawrence estuary, Canada.Marine Ecology Progress Series 94: 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Largier, J. L. 1996. Hydrodynamic exchange between San Francisco Bay and the ocean: The role of ocean circulation and stratification, p. 69–104.In J. T. Hollibaugh (ed.), San Francisco Bay: The Ecosystem. AAAS, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  63. Lehman, P. W. 2000. Phytoplankton biomass, cell diameter, and species composition in the low salinity zone of Northern San Francisco Bay estuary.Estuaries 23:216–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Livingston, R. J., F. G. Lewis, G. C. Woodsum, X. Niu, B. Galperin, W. Huang, J. D. Christensen, M. E. Monaco, T. A. Battista, C. J. Klein, R. L. Howell, andG. L. Ray. 2000. Modelling oyster population response to variation in freshwater input.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 50:655–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Longley, W. L. 1994. Freshwater inflows to Texas bays and estuaries: Ecological relationships and methods for determination of needs. Texas Water Development Board. Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  66. Lucas, L. V., J. E. Cloern, J. R. Koseff, S. G. Monismith, andJ. K. Thompson. 1998. Does the Sverdrup critical depth model explain bloom dynamics in estuaries?Journal of Marine Research 56:375–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Luoma, S. N. andD. J. Cain. 1979. Fluctuations of copper, zinc, and silver in tellenid clams as related to freshwater discharge—south San Francisco Bay, p. 231–246.In T. J. Conomos (ed.), San Francisco Bay; The Urbanized Estuary. Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  68. Mallin, M. A., H. W. Paerl, J. Rudex, andP. W. Bates. 1993. Regulation of estuarine primary production by watershed rainfall and river flow.Marine Ecology Progress Series 93:199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Malone, T. C., L. H. Crocker, S. E. Pike, andB. W. Wendler. 1988. Influences of river flow on the dynamics of phytoplankton production in a partially stratified estuary.Marine Ecology Progress Series 48:235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McCulloch, D. S., D. H. Peterson, P. R. Carlson, andT. J. Conomos. 1970. Some effects of freshwater inflow on the flushing of south San Francisco Bay: A preliminary report. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 637-A. U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California.Google Scholar
  71. McIvor, C. C., J. A. Ley, andR. D. Bjork. 1994. Changes in freshwater inflow from the Everglades to Florida Bay including effects on biota and biotic processes: A review, p. 117–146.In S. Davis and J. Ogden (eds.), Everglades. The Ecosystem and Its Restoration. St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  72. Micklin, S. G., J. R. Burau, andM. Stacey. 1996. Stratification dynamics and gravitational circulation in northern San Francisco Bay, p. 123–153.In J. T. Hollibaugh (ed.), San Francisco Bay: The Ecosystem. AAAS, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  73. Monismith, S. G., W. J. Kimmerer, J. R. Burau, andM. T. Stacey. 2002. Structure and flow-induced variability of the subtidal salinity field in northern San Francisco Bay.Journal of Physical Oceanography 32:3003–3019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Monteleone, D. M. andE. D. Houde. 1992. Vulnerability of striped bassMorone saxatilis waldbaum eggs and larvae to predation by juvenile white perchMorone americana Gmelin.Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 158:93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Moon, C. andW. M. Dunstan. 1990. Hydrodynamic trapping in the formation of the chlorophyll-alpha peak in turbid, very low salinity water of estuaries.Journal of Plankton Research 12:323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Moyle, P. B. 2002. Inland Fishes of California, 2nd edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
  77. Nichols, F. H. 1985. Increased benthic grazing: An alternative explanation for low phytoplankton biomass in northern San Francisco Bay during the 1976–1977 drought.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 21:379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nichols, F., J. Cloern, S. Luoma, andD. Peterson. 1986. The modification of an estuary.Science 231:567–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nixon, S. W., C. A. Oviatt, J. Frithsen, andB. Sullivan. 1986. Nutrients and the productivity of estuarine and coastal marine systems.Journal of the Limnological Society of South Africa 12:43–71.Google Scholar
  80. Nobriga, M. andZ. Maltica. 2000. Sherman island agricultural diversion evaluation. Interagency Ecological Program.San Francisco Estuary Newsletter 13:11.Google Scholar
  81. Oltmann, R. N. 1998. Indirect measurement of Delta outflow using ultrasonic velocity meters and comparison with massbalance calculated outflow. Interagency Ecological Program for theSan Francisco.Estuary Newsletter 11:5–8.Google Scholar
  82. Orsi, J. andW. Mecum. 1986. Zooplankton distribution and abundance in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta in relation to certain environmental factors.Estuaries 9:326–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Orsi, J. J. andW. L. Mecum. 1996. Food limitation as the probable cause of a long-term decline in the abundance ofNeomysis mercedis the opossum shrimp in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary, p. 375–401.In J. T. Hollibaugh (ed.), San Francisco Bay: The Ecosystem. AAAS, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  84. Peterson, D. H., T. J. Conomos, W. W. Broenkow, andP. C. Doherty. 1975. Location of the non-tidal current null zone in northern San Francisco Bay.Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 3:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Postma, V. H. andK. Kalle. 1955. On the development of turbid zones in the lower course of rivers with special consideration of conditions in the lower Elbe.Deutsche Hydrographische Zeitschrift 8:137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rice, J. and K. Newman. 1997. Statistical model for survival of chinook salmon smolts outmigrating through the lower Sacramento-San Joaquin system. Interagency Ecological Program for the San Francisco Bay/Delta Estuary. Technical Report 59. Sacramento, California.Google Scholar
  87. Richards, R. A. andP. J. Rago. 1999. A case history of effective fishery management: Chesapeake Bay striped bass.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:356–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Riley, G. A. 1937. The significance of the Mississippi River drainage for biological conditions in the northern Gulf of Mexico.Journal of Marine Research 1:60–74.Google Scholar
  89. Rudnick, D. T., Z. Chen, D. L. Childers, J. N. Boyer, andT. D. Fontaine, III. 1999. Phosphorus and nitrogen inputs to Florida Bay: The importance of the Everglades watershed.Estuaries 22:398–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schemel, L. E., S. W. Hager, andD. Childers, Jr. 1996. The supply and carbon content of suspended sediment from the Sacramento River to San Francisco Bay, p. 237–260.In J. T. Hollibaugh (ed.), San Francisco Bay: The Ecosystem. AAAS. San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  91. Schoellhamer, D. H. 1996. Factors affecting suspended-solids concentrations in south San Francisco Bay, California.Journal of Geophysical Research 101:12087–12095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Schoellhamer, D. H. 2001. Influence of salinity, bottom topography, and tides on locations of estuarine turbidity maxima in northern San Francisco Bay, p. 343–356.In W. H. McAnally and A. J. Mehta (eds.), Coastal and Estuarine Fine Sediment Processes. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  93. Sirois, P. andJ. J. Dodson. 2000. Critical periods and growth-dependent survival of larvae of an estuarine fish, the rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax.Marine Ecology Progress Series 203:233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sklar, F. H. andJ. A. Browder. 1998. Coastal environmental impacts brought about by alterations to freshwater flow in the Gulf of Mexico.Environmental Management 22:547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Skreslet, S. 1986. The Role of Freshwater Outflow in Coastal Marine Ecosystems. NATO ASI Series, G edition. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  96. Smith, S. V. andJ. T. Hollibaugh. 1993. Coastal metabolism and the oceanic organic carbon balance.Reviews of Geophysics 31:75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sommer, T., R. Baxter, andB. Herbold. 1997. Resilience of splittail in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 126:961–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sommer, T. R., L. Conrad, G. O'Leary, F. Feyrer, W. C. Harrell, andD. Feliz. 2002. Spawning and rearing of splittail in a model floodplain wetland.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131:966–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Speed, T. 1993. Modelling and managing a salmon population, p. 268–290.In V. Barnett and K. Feridun Turkman (eds.), Statistics for the Environment. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  100. Stevens, D. E., D. W. Kohlhorst, L. W. Miller, andD. W. Kelley. 1985. The decline of striped bass in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary, California.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 114:12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Turner, J. L. andH. K. Chadwick. 1972. Distribution and abundance of young-of-the-year striped bass, Morone saxatilis, in relation to river flow in the Sacramento-San Joaquin estuary.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 101:442–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Uncles, R. J., J. A. Stephens, andM. L. Barton. 1992. Observations of fine-sediment concentrations and transport in the turbidity maximum region of an estuary, p. 255–276.In D. Prandle (ed.), Dynamics and Exchanges in Estuaries and the Coastal Zone. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  103. Venables, W. N. andB. N. Ripley. 1997. Modern Applied Statistics with S-plus, 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  104. Vörösmarty, C. J., P. Green, J. Salisbury, andR. B. Lammers. 2000. Global water resources: Vulnerability from climate change and population growth.Science 289:284–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wainright, S. C., C. M. Fuller, R. H. Michener, andR. A. Richards. 1996. Spatial variation of trophic position and growth rate of juvenile striped bass (Morone saxatilis) in the Delaware River.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:685–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Walters, C. J. 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  107. Walters, C. J. andC. S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing.Ecology 71:2060–2068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Walters, R. A., R. T. Cheng, andT. J. Conomos. 1985. Time scales of circulation and mixing processes of San Francisco Bay waters.Hydrobiologia 129:13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Whitfield, A. K. andT. H. Wooldridge. 1994. Changes in freshwater supplies to southern African estuaries: Some theoretical and practical considerations, p. 41–50.In K. R. Dyer and R. J. Orth (eds.), Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management. Olsen & Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  110. Wilber, D. H. 1992. Associations between freshwater inflows and oyster productivity in Apalachicola Bay, Florida.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 35:179–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Williams, P. B. 1989. Managing freshwater inflow to the San Francisco Bay estuary.Regulated Rivers—Research and Management 4:285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Romberg Tiburon CenterSan Francisco State UniversityTiburon

Personalised recommendations