, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 1246–1261 | Cite as

A conceptual model of estuarine freshwater inflow management

  • Merryl AlberEmail author


As humans continue to influence the quantity, timing, and quality of freshwater input to estuaries, it is becoming increasingly common for policies to be enacted that mandate the establishment of freshwater inflow criteria that will serve to preserve and protect estuarine ecosystems. This paper reviews the scientific literature describing how changes in freshwater inflow affect estuaries, proposes a conceptual model that explores the roles of scientists, citizens, politicians, and managers in the management of freshwater inflow to estuaries, and uses the model to explore the ways in which freshwater inflow is managed in a variety of estuaries. The scientific review is organized to provide an overview of the connections between freshwater inflow (in terms of the quantity, quality, and timing of water delivery), estuarine conditions (such as salinity and concentrations of dissolved and particulate material), and estuarine resources (such as the distribution and abundance of organisms), and to highlight our understanding of the causative mechanisms that underlie the relationships among these variables. The premise of the conceptual model is that the goal of estuarine freshwater inflow policy is to protect those resources and functions that we as a society value in estuaries, and that management measures use scientific information about the relationships among inflow, conditions, and resources to establish inflow standards that can meet this goal. The management approach can be inflow-based (flow is kept within some prescribed bounds under the assumption that taking too much away is bad for the resources), condition-based (inflow standards are set in order to maintain specified conditions in the estuary), or resource-based (inflow standards are set based on the requirements of specific resources), but each of these is carried out by regulating inflow. This model is used as a framework to describe the development of freshwater inflow criteria for estuaries in Texas, Florida, and California.


Conceptual Model Particulate Material Management Measure Freshwater Input Freshwater Inflow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Alber, M. andJ. E. Sheldon. 1999. Use of a date-specific method to examine variability in the flushing times of Georgia estuaries.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 49:469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aleem, A. A.. 1972. Effect of river outflow management on marine life.Marine Biology 15:200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ardisson, P.-L. andE. Bourget. 1997. A study of the relationship between freshwater runoff and benthic abundance: A scale-oriented approach.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 45:535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beamish, R. J., C.-E. M. Neville, B. L. Thomson, P. J. Harrison, andM. St. John. 1994. A relationship between Fraser River discharge and interannual production of Pacific Salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) and Pacific herring (Clupea pallasi) in the Strait of Georgia.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 51:2843–2855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake, N. M. 1980. Land into Water—Water into Land. University Presses of Florida, Tallahassee, Florida.Google Scholar
  6. Boesch, D., A. Mehta, J. Morris, W. Nuttle, C. Simenstad andD. Swift. 1994. Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration and management in Louisiana.Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue 20:1–103.Google Scholar
  7. Bowman, M. J. andR. L. Iverson. 1978. Estuarine and plume fronts, p. 87–104.In M. J. Bowman and W. E. Esaias (eds.). Oceanic Fronts in Coastal Processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  8. Boynton, W. R., J. H. Garber, R. Summers andW. M. Kemp. 1995. Inputs, transformations, and transport of nitrogen and phosphorus in Chesapeake Bay and selected tributaries.Estuaries 18:285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browder, J. A.. 1985. Relationship between pink shrimp production on the Tortugas grounds and water flow patterns in the Florida Everglades.Bulletin of Marine Science 37:839–856.Google Scholar
  10. Bulger, A. J., B. P. Hayden, M. E. Monaco, D. M. Nelson, andM. G. McCormick-Ray. 1993. Biologically-based estuarine salinity zones derived from a multivariate analysis.Estuaries 16: 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Castleberry, D. T., J. J. Cech, Jr.,D. C. Erman, D. Hankin, M. Healey, G. M. Kondolf, M. Mangel, M. Mohr, P. B. Moyle, J. Nielsen, T. P. Speed, andJ. G. Williams. 1996. Uncertainty and instream flow standards.Fisheries 21:20–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chamberlain, R. H. andP. H. Doering. 1998. Preliminary estimate of optimum freshwater inflow to the Caloosahatchee estuary: A resource-based approach.In Proceedings of the Charlotte Harbor Public Conference and Technical Symposium. Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, Florida.Google Scholar
  13. Christensen, N. L., A. M. Bartuska, J. H. Brown, S. Carpenter, C. D'Antonio, R. Francis, J. F. Franklin, J. A. MacMahon, R. F. Noss, D. J. Parsons, C. H. Peterson, M. G. Turner, andR. G. Woodmansee. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management.Ecological Applications 6:665–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, W. C. 1986. Sustainable development of the biosphere: Themes for a research program, p. 5–48.In W. C. Clark and R. E. Munn (eds.). Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U. K.Google Scholar
  15. Cloern, J. E. 1984. Temporal dynamics and ecological significance of salinity stratification in an estuary (South San Francisco Bay, USA).Oceanologica Acta 7:137–141.Google Scholar
  16. Cloern, J. E., A. E. Alpine, B. E. Cole, R. L. J. Wong, J. F. Arthur, andM. D. Ball. 1983. River discharge controls phytoplankton dynamics in the Northern San Francisco Bay estuary.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 16:415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Copeland, B. J. 1966. Effects of decreased river flow on estuarine ecology.Estuarine Ecology 38:1831–1839.Google Scholar
  18. Day, Jr.,J. W., C. J. Madden, R. R. Twilley, R. F. Shaw, B. A. McKee, M. J. Dagg, D. L. Childers, R. C. Raynie, andL. J. Rouse. 1994. The influence of Atchafalaya River discharge on Fourleague Bay, Louisiana (USA), p. 151–160.In K. R. Dyer and R. J. Orth (eds.), Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  19. Dettmann, E. H. 2001. Effect of water residence time on annual export and denitrification of nitrogen in estuaries: A model analysis.Estuaries 24:481–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doering, P. H., R. H. Chamberlain andD. E. Haunert. 2002. Using submerged aquatic vegetation to establish minimum and maximum freshwater inflows to the Caloosahatchee estuary, Florida.Estuaries 25:1343–1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Drinkwater, K. F. andK. T., Frank. 1994. Effects of river regulation and diversion on marine fish and invertebrates.Aquatic Conservation: Freshwater and Marine Ecosystems 4:135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dynesius, M. andC. Nilsson. 1994. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world.Science 266:753–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Farb, P. 1965. Disaster threatens the Everglades.Audubon Magazine Sept.–Oct.Google Scholar
  24. Flannery, M. S., E. B. Peebles andR. T. Montgomery. 2002. A percentage-of-streamflow approach for managing reductions of freshwater inflows from unimpounded rivers to southwest Florida estuaries.Estuaries 25:1318–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flint, R. W.. 1985. Long-term estuarine variability and associated biological response.Estuaries 8:158–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flint, R. W., G. L. Powell andR. D. Kalke. 1986. Ecological effects from the balance between new and recycled nitrogen in Texas coastal waters.Estuaries 9:284–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galindo-Bect, M. S., E. P. Glenn, H. M. Page, K. Fitzsimmons, L. A. Galindo-Bect, J. M. Hernandex-Ayon, R. L. Petty, J. Garcia-Hernandez, andD. Moore. 2000. Penaeid shrimp landings in the upper Gulf of California in relation to Colorado River freshwater discharge.Fisheries Bulletin 98:222–225.Google Scholar
  28. Gammelsrød, T.. 1992. Variation in shrimp abundance on the Sofala Bank, Mozambique, and its relation to the Zambezi River runoff.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 35:91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilmour, A., G. Walkerden andJ. Scandol. 1999. Adaptive management of the water cycle on the urban fringe: Three Australian case studies.Conservation Ecology 3(1):11. [online] URL: Scholar
  30. Gracia, A.. 1991. Spawning stock-recruitment relationships of white shrimp in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120:519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grange, N., A. K. Whitfield, C. J. De Villiers, andB. R. Allanson. 2000. The response of two South African east coast estuaries to altered river flow regimes.Aquatic Conservation: Freshwater and Marine Ecosystems 10:155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gray, A. N. 2000. Adaptive ecosystem management in the Pacific Northwest: A case study from coastal Oregon.Conservation Ecology 4(2):6 [online] URL: Scholar
  33. Hallim, Y.. 1991. The impact of human alterations of the hydrological cycle on ocean margins, p. 301–327.In R. F. C. Mantoura, J.-M. Martin, and R. Wollast (eds.). Ocean Margin Processes in Global Change. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K.Google Scholar
  34. Hoese, H. D.. 1960. Biotic changes in a bay associated with the end of a drought.Limnology and Oceanography 5:326–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoese, H. D.. 1967. Effect of higher than normal salinities on salt marshes.Contributions in Marine Science 12:249–261.Google Scholar
  36. Holling, C. S.. 1978. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, U.K.Google Scholar
  37. Howarth, R. W.. 1998. An assessment of human influences on fluxes of nitrogen from the terrestrial landscape to the estuaries and continental shelves of the North Atlantic Ocean.Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 52:213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Howarth, R.W., D. P. Swaney, T. J. Butler andR. Marino. 2000. Climatic control on eutrophication of the Hudson River estuary.Ecosystems 3:210–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Incze, L. S., L. M. Mayer, E. B. Sherr andS. A. Macko. 1982. Carbon inputs to bivalve mollusks: A comparison of two estuaries.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 39: 1348–1352.Google Scholar
  40. Ingram, R. G., L. Legendre, Y. Simard, andS. Leparge. 1985. Phytoplankton response to freshwater runoff: The diversion of the Eastmain River, James Bay.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 42:1216–1221.Google Scholar
  41. Ittekkot, V., C. Humborg andP. Schäfer. 2000. Hydrological alterations and marine biogeochemistry: A silicate issue?BioScience 50:776–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jassby, A. D., W. J. Kimmerer, S. G. Monismith, C. Arbor, J. E. Cloern, T. M. Powell, J. R. Schubel, andT. J. Vendlinski. 1995. Isohaline position as a habitat indicator for estuarine populations.Ecological Applications 5:272–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnson, B. L.. 1999. The role of adaptive management as an operational approach for resource management agencies.Conservation Ecology 3(2):8. [online] URL: Scholar
  44. Jordan, T. E., D. L. Correll, J. Miklas andD. E. Weller. 1991. Long-term trends in estuarine nutrients and chlorophyll, and short-term effects of variation in watershed discharge.Marine Ecology Progress Series 75:121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kimmerer, W. J.. 2002. Physical, biological, and management responses to variable freshwater flow into the San Francisco estuary.Estuaries 25:1275–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kimmerer, W. J. andJ. R. Schubel. 1994. Managing freshwater flows into San Francisco Bay using a salinity standard: Results of a workshop, p. 411–416.In K. R. Dyer and R. J. Orth (eds.). Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  47. Lehman, P. W.. 1992. Environmental factors associated with longterm changes in chlorophyll concentration in the Sacramento-San Joaquin delta and Suisun Bay, California.Estuaries 15: 335–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Light, S. S., L. H. Gunderson andC. S. Holling. 1995. The Everglades: Evolution of management in a turbulent ecosystem, p. 103–168.In L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling, and S. S. Light (eds.). Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Livingston, R. J.. 1997. Trophic response of estuarine fishes to long-term changes of river runoff.Bulletin of Marine Science 60: 984–1004.Google Scholar
  50. Livingston, R. J., X. Niu, F. G. Lewis, andG. C. Woodsum. 1997. Freshwater input to a gulf estuary: Long-term control of trophic organization.Ecological Applications 7:277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Longley, W. L., (ed.) 1994. Freshwater inflows to Texas bays and estuaries: Ecological relationships and methods for determination of needs. Texas Water Development Board and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  52. Mallin, M. A., H. W. Paerl, J. Rudek andP. W. Bates. 1993. Regulation of estuarine primary production by watershed rainfall and river flow.Marine Ecology Progress Series 93:199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Malone, T. C., L. H. Crocker, S. E. Pike, andB. W. Wendler. 1988. Influences of river flow on the dynamics of phytoplankton production in a partially stratified estuary.Marine Ecology Progress Series 48:235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Matsumoto, J., G. Powell andD. Brock. 1994. Freshwater-inflow need of estuary computed by Texas estuarine MP model.Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 120:693–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mattson, R.. 2002. A resource-based framework for establishing freshwater inflow requirements for the Suwannee River estuary.Estuaries 25:1333–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McIvor, C. C., J. A. Ley andR. D. Bjork. 1994. Changes in freshwater inflow from the Everglades to Florida Bay including effects on biota and biotic processes: A review, p. 117–146.In S. M. Davis and J. C. Ogden (eds.). Everglades: The Ecosystem and Its Restoration. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, Florida.Google Scholar
  57. Montague, C. L. andJ. A. Ley. 1993. A possible effect of salinity fluctuation on abundance of benthic vegetation and associated fauna in northeastern Florida Bay.Estuaries 16:703–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mousset, M. B., J. P. Croue, E. Lefebvre andB. Legube. 1997. Distribution and characterization of dissolved organic matter of surface waters.Water Research 31:541–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. National Research Council (NRC). 1990. Managing Troubled Waters: The Role of Environmental Monitoring. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  60. Nixon, S. W. 1992. Quantifying the relationship between nitrogen input and the productivity of marine ecosystems.Proceedings Advances in Marine Technology Conference 5:57–83.Google Scholar
  61. Nixon, S. W., J. W. Ammerman, L. P. Atkinson, V. M. Verounsky, G. Billen, W. C. Boicourt, W. R. Boynton, T. M. Church, D. M. DiToro, R. Elmgren, J. H. Garber, A. E. Giblin, R. A. Jahnke, N. J. P. Owens, M. E. Q. Pilson, andS. P. Seitzinger. 1996. The fate of nitrogen and phosphorus at the land-sea margin of the North Atlantic Ocean.Biogeochemistry 35:141–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability (OPPAGA). 1995. Performance review of the consumptive use permitting program administered by the Department of Environmental Protection and the Water Management Districts. Report No. 94-34. The Florida Legislature Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. Tallahassee, Florida.Google Scholar
  63. Perry, J. E. andC. H. Hershner. 1999. Temporal changes in the vegetation pattern in a tidal freshwater marsh.Wetlands 19:90–99.Google Scholar
  64. Plumstead, E. E. 1990. Changes in ichthyofaunal diversity and abundance within the Mbashe estuary, Transkei, following construction of a river barrage.South African Journal of Marine Science 9:399–407.Google Scholar
  65. Poff, N. L., J. D. Allan, M. B. Bain, J. R. Karr, K. L. Prestegaard, B. D. Richter, R. E. Sparks, andJ. C. Stromberg. 1997. The natural flow regime.BioScience 47:769–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Postel, S. L. 1998. Water for food production: Will there be enough in 2025?BioScience 48:629–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Powell, G. L., J. Matsumoto, andD. A. Brock. 2002. Methods for determining minimum freshwater inflow needs of Texas bays and estuaries.Estuaries 25:1262–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Powell, G. L. andJ. Matsumoto. 1994. Texas Estuarine Mathematical Programming Model: A tool for freshwater inflow management, p. 401–406.In K. R. Dyer and R. J. Orth (eds.). Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  69. Quinn, N. W., C. M. Breen, A. K. Whitfield, andJ. W. Hearne. 1999. An index for the management of South African estuaries for juvenile fish recruitment from the marine environment.Fisheries Management and Ecology 6:421–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rabalais, N. N., W. J. Wiseman, Jr.,R. E. Turner, D. Justíc, B. K. Sen Gupta, andQ. Dortch. 1996. Nutrient changes in the Mississippi River and system responses on the adjacent continental shelf.Estuaries 19:386–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reddering, J. S. V. 1988. Prediction of the effects of reduced river discharge on the estuaries of the south-eastern Cape Province.South African journal of Science 84:726–730.Google Scholar
  72. Richter, B. D., J. V. Baumgartner, R. Wigington, andD. P. Braun. 1997. How much water does a river need?Freshwater Biology 37:231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Riera, P. andP. Richard. 1996. Isotopic determination of food sources ofCrassostrea gigas along a trophic gradient in the estuarine bay of Marennes-Oléron.Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 42:347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rulifson, R. A. andC. S. Manooch, III. 1990. Recruitment of juvenile striped bass in the Roanoke River, North Carolina, as related to reservoir discharge.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 10:397–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schuyler, A. E., S. S. Andersen, andV. J. Kolaga. 1993. Plant zonation in the tidal portion of the Delaware River.Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 144:263–266.Google Scholar
  76. Sheldon, J. E. andM. Alber. 2002. Residence times in the Altamaha River estuary.Estuaries 25:1304–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sklar, F. H. andJ. A. Browder. 1998. Coastal environmental impacts brought about by alterations to freshwater flow in the Gulf of Mexico.Environmental Management 22:547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Skreslet, S. 1986. Freshwater outflow in relation to space and time dimensions of complex ecological interactions in coastal waters, p. 3–12.In S. Skreslet (ed.). The Role of Freshwater Outflow in Coastal Marine Ecosystems. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  79. Smith, C. B. 2001. Analysis of historic vegetation changes in two Georgia estuaries using aerial photography and GIS. M.S. Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
  80. Solis, R. S. andG. L. Powell. 1999. Hydrography, mixing characteristics, and residence times of Gulf of Mexico estuaries, p. 29–71.In T. S. Bianchi, J. R. Pennock, and R. R. Twilley (eds.), Biogeochemistry of Gulf of Mexico Estuaries. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  81. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). 2001. Draft Minimum flows and levels for the Loxahatchee River and estuary, May 22, 2001 Draft. South Florida Water Management District Water Supply Division, West Palm Beach, Florida.Google Scholar
  82. Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). 1998. Water use permit information manual including chapter 40D-2, Florida Administration Code: Basis of review for water use permit applications and design aids. Southwest Florida Water Management District. Brooksville, Florida.Google Scholar
  83. Sparks, R. E. 1992. Risks of altering the hydrologic regime of large rivers, p. 119–152.In J. Cairns, Jr., B. R. Niederlehner, and D. R. Orvos (eds.), Predicting Ecosystem Risk. Princeton Scientific Publishing Co., Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  84. Stevens, D. E. andL. W. Miller. 1983. Effects of river flow on abundance of young Chinook Salmon, American Shad, Longfin Smelt, and Delta Smelt in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River system.North American Journal of Fisheries Management 3: 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sutcliffe, Jr.,W. H. 1973. Correlations between seasonal river discharge and local landings of American lobster (Homarus americanus) and Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) in the Gulf of St. Lawrence.Journal Fisheries Research Board Canada 30:856–859.Google Scholar
  86. Sutcliffe, Jr.,W. H., R. H. Loucks, K. F. Drinkwater, andA. R. Coote. 1983. Nutrient flux onto the Labrador Shelf from Hudson Strait and its biological consequences.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 40:1692–1701.Google Scholar
  87. Townsend, S. A., J. T. LuongVan, andK. T. Boland. 1996. Retention time as a primary determinant of colour and light attenuation in two tropical Australian reservoirs.Freshwater Biology 36:57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tuohy, W. S. 1993. Characterizing the San Francisco estuary: A case study of science management in the National Estuary Program.Coastal Management 21:113–129.Google Scholar
  89. Turner, R. E. 1992. Coastal wetlands and penaeid shrimp habitat, p. 97–104.In R. H. Stroud (ed.), Marine Recreational Fisheries 14. National Coalition for Marine Conservation. Savannah, Georgia.Google Scholar
  90. Ustach, J. F., W. W. Kirby-Smith, andR. T. Barber. 1986. Effect of watershed modification on a small coastal plain estuary, p. 177–192.In D. A. Wolfe (ed.), Estuarine Variability. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
  91. Van Winkle, W., C. C. Coutant, H. I. Jager, J. S. Mattice, D. J. Orth, R. G. Otto, S. F. Railsback, andM. J. Sale. 1997. Uncertainty and instream flow standards: Perspectives based on hydropower research and assessment.Fisheries 22:21–22.Google Scholar
  92. Vörösmarty, C. J. andD. Sahagian. 2000. Anthropogenic disturbance of the terrestrial water cycle.BioScience 50:753–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Walters, C. 1997. Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems.Conservation Ecology 1(2):1. [online] URL: Scholar
  94. Walters, C. J. andC. S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing.Ecology 71:2060–2068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. White, C. J. andW. S. Perret. 1974. Short term effects of the Toledo Bend project on Sabine Lake, Louisiana, p. 710–721.In A. L. Mitchell (ed.), Proceedings, 27th Annual Conference. Southeast Association Game and Fish Committees, Hot Springs, Arkansas.Google Scholar
  96. Whitfield, A. K. 1994. Abundance of larval and 0+ juvenile marine fishes in the lower reaches of three southern African estuaries with differing freshwater inputs.Marine Ecology Progress Series 105:257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Whitfield, A. K. andM. N. Bruton. 1989. Some biological implications of reduced fresh water inflow into eastern Cape estuaries: A preliminary assessment.South African Journal of Science 85:691–694.Google Scholar
  98. Whitfield, A. K. andT. H. Woolridge. 1994. Changes in freshwater supplies to southern African estuaries: Some theoretical and practical considerations, p. 41–50.In K. R. Dyer and R. J. Orth (eds.), Changes in Fluxes in Estuaries: Implications from Science to Management. Olsen and Olsen, Fredensborg. Denmark.Google Scholar

Sources of Unpublished materials

  1. Calfed. 2002. CALFED Bay-Delta Program. http://calfed. Scholar
  2. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 1995 NEP Monitoring Guidance. EPA 842-B-92-004. owow/estuaries/guidance.Google Scholar
  3. Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). 2002. Texas Water Development Board bays_estuaries/b_nEpage.html.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Estuarine Research Federation 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marine SciencesUniversity of GeorgiaAthens

Personalised recommendations