The American Sociologist

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 72–90

Frederick jackson turner and the democratization of the electronic frontier

Symposium On Electronic Communication And Sociology

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baym, Nancy. 1995. “The Emergence of Community in Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Steven Jones (ed.)Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 138–163.Google Scholar
  2. Beniger, James R. 1986.The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Browning, John. 1994. “Universal Service (An Idea Whose Time is Past).”Wired. 2, 9.Google Scholar
  4. Cutler, Richard. 1995. “Distributed Presence And Community in Cyberspace,”Iterpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 3, 2: 12–32.Google Scholar
  5. Fortner, Robert. 1995. “Excommunication in the Information Society.”Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12, 2: 133–154.Google Scholar
  6. Harrington, C. Lee and Denise D. Bielby. 1995. “Where Did You Hear That? Technology and the Social Organization of Gossip.”The Sociological Quarterly, 36, 3: 607–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heilbroner, Robert L. 1993.21st Century Capitalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Kammen, Michael. 1972.People of Paradox. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  9. Lauria, Rita and Harold White, Jr. 1995. “Mythic Analogues of the Space and the Cyberspace: A Critical Analysis of U.S. Policy for the Space and the Information Age.”Journal of Communication Inquiry, 19, 2: 64–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. London, Scott (1995). “Teledemocracy vs. Deliberative Democracy A Comparative Look at Two Models of Public Talk.”Interpersonal and Computing Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century. 3, 2: 33–55.Google Scholar
  11. McLaughlin, Margaret, Kerry Osbourne and Christine Smith. 1995. “Standards of Conduct on Usenet.” In Steven Jones (ed.)Cybersociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 90–109.Google Scholar
  12. Metz, J. (1993). “An Ethnographic Examination of Computer-Mediated Communication: The Culture of Compusex.” Masters Thesis, University of South Dakota.Google Scholar
  13. Metz, J. 1994. “Computer-Mediated Communication: Literature Review of a New Context.”Interpersonal and Computing Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century. 3, 1.Google Scholar
  14. Metz, J. (in press). “Clash of the Cybercultures.”Mid-Atlantic Almanack.Google Scholar
  15. Meyrowitz, Joshua. 1985.No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. O’Sullivan, Patrick. 1995. “Computer Networks and Political Participation: Santa Monica’s Teledemocracy Project.”Journal of Applied Communication Research. 23, 3: 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Page, Amy. 1994. “Microsoft: A Case Study in International Competitiveness, High Technology and the Future of Antitrust Law.”Federal Communications Law Journal, 47, 1: 99–122.Google Scholar
  18. Reid, Elizabeth M. (1991) “Electropolis: Communication and Community on Internet Relay Chat.” Unpublished Thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  19. Rheingold, Howard. 1993.The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  20. Staff 1991.History of the Internet. MERT Report: Network Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Sterling, Bruce. 1993. “A Short History of the Internet.”The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction (February).Google Scholar
  22. Turner, Frederick Jackson. 1920.The Significance of the Frontier in American History. New York: H. Holt and Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Mass CommunicationUniversity of BridgeportBridgeport

Personalised recommendations