Advertisement

The American Sociologist

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 56–68 | Cite as

Why advocacy research?: Reflections on research and activism with immigrant women

  • Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo
Article

Abstract

This article discusses some of the common problems that arise in fomenting participatory research, and proposes that some form of advocacy research may be a more accessible alternative. The advocacy research alternative is distinguished from the pure model of participatory research by several factors: 1) the people being studied do not control the research; 2) advocacy research recognizes that it is not always possible to know in advance precisely what research findings will in fact be “useful” as a tool of social change; and 3) advocacy research is realized through political action, but not necessarily in the same community in which the research was conducted. I discuss advocacy research by relating some of my research experiences in a Mexican undocumented immigrant community in northern California, and how I utilized some of the research materials in an outreach program aimed at Latina immigrant domestic workers in Los Angeles.

Keywords

Social Change Participatory Research Political Action Immigrant Woman Domestic Worker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, L. David and Rajesh Tandon. 1983. “Ideology and Political Economy in Inquiry: Action Research and Participatory Research.”Journal of Applied Behavioral Sciences, 19: 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cancian, Francesca M. forthcoming. “Participatory Research and Alternative Strategies for Activist Sociology.” InFeminism and Social Change: Bridging Theory and Practice. Heidi Gottfried, editor. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  3. Clark, Elizabeth J. and Jan M. Fritz. 1986. “The Clinical Approach to Successful Program Development,”Clinical Sociology Review, 4: 173–181.Google Scholar
  4. Fals Borda, Orlando. 1988.Knowledge and People’s Power: Lessons with Peasants in Nicaragua, Mexico and Colombia. New York, NY: New Horizons Press.Google Scholar
  5. Freire, Paulo. 1970.Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. forthcoming. “Immigrant Women and Paid Domestic Work: Research, Theory and Activism.” InFeminism and Social Change: Bridging Theory and Practice. Heidi Gottfried, editor. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hondagneu-Sotelo, Pierrette. 1992. “Overcoming Patriarchal Constraints: The Reconstruction of Gender Relations Among Mexican Immigrant Women and Men.”Gender & Society, 6: 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Park, Peter, 1978. “Social Research and Radical Change.” Presentation at the 9th World Congress of Sociology, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  9. Participatory Research Network. 1982.Participatory Research: An Introduction. New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia.Google Scholar
  10. Romero, Mary. 1988. “Chicanas Modernize Domestic Service.”Qualitative Sociology, 11: 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rose, Hilary. 1983. “Hand, Brain and Heart: A Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences,”Signs, 9: 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stacey, Judith, 1988. “Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography?”Women’s Studies International Forum, 11: 21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stoecker, Randy and Edna Bonacich. (this volume). “Special Guest Editor’s Introduction: Why Participatory Research?”The American Sociologist, 24, 1: pp#’s?Google Scholar
  14. Tandon, Rajesh. 1981. “Social Transformation and Participatory Research,”Convergence, 14: 20–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pierrette Hondagneu-Sotelo
    • 1
  1. 1.the University of Southern CaliforniaLos Angeles

Personalised recommendations