The American Sociologist

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 188–191 | Cite as

Disciplinary fragmentation, peer review, and the publication process

  • Mary Frank Fox
Debate: Publishing More, Publishing Better

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allison, Paul and J.A. Stewart. 1974. “Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence of Cumulative Advantage.”American Sociological Review 39:596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakanic, Von, Clark McPhail, and Rita Simon. 1987. “The Manuscript Review and Decision Making Process.”American Sociological Review 52:631–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biglan, Anthony. 1973. “Relationships Between Subject Matter Characteristics and Output of University Departments.”Journal of Applied Psychology 57:204–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell, John, Richard Daft, and Charles Hulin. 1982.What to Study: Generating and Developing Research Questions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Cole, Jonathan and Harriet Zuckerman. 1984. “The Productivity Puzzle: Persistence and Change in the Patterns of Publication Among Men and Women Scientists.” Pp. 217–58 inWomen in Science, edited by P. Maeher and M.W. Steinkamp. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, Murray. 1971. “That’s Interesting!”Philosophy of the Social Sciences 1:309–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fox, Mary Frank. 1983. “Publication Productivity Among Scientists.”Social Studies of Science 13:285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. _____. 1985a. “Performance, Publication, and Reward in Science and Scholarship.” Pp. 255–82 inHigher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, edited by J. Smart. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  9. _____. 1985b. “The Transition from Dissertation Student to Publishing Scholar and Professional.” Pp. 6–16 inScholarly Writing and Publishing: Issues, Problem, and Solutions, edited by M.F. Fox. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  10. Garvey, William, Nan Lin, and Carnot Nelson. 1970. “Some Comparisons of Communication Activities in the Physical and Social Sciences.” Pp. 61–84 inCommunication Among Scientists and Engineers, edited by C.E. Nelson and D. Pollock. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  11. Hagstrom, Warren. 1970. “Factors Related to the Use of Different Modes of Publishing in Four Scientific Fields.” Pp. 85–124 inCommunication Among Scientists, edited by C. Nelson and D. Pollock. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  12. Hargens, Lowell. 1988. “Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates.”American Sociological Review 53:139–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harnad, Stevan. 1979. “Creative Disagreement.”The Sciences 19:18–20.Google Scholar
  14. Ladd, Everett Carl and Seymour Martin Lipset. 1975. “How Professors Spend Their Time.”Chronicle of Higher Education (October 14):2.Google Scholar
  15. _____. 1977. “Survey of 4,400 Faculty Members at 161 Colleges and Universities.”Chronicle of Higher Education (November 21):12; and (November 28):2.Google Scholar
  16. Lightfield, Timothy. 1971. “Output and Recognition of Scientists.”American Sociologist 6:128–33.Google Scholar
  17. Lindsey, Duncan. 1978.The Scientific Publication System in Social Science. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Long, J. Scott. 1978. “Productivity and Academic Position in the Scientific Career.”American Sociological Review 43:889–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nelson, Katherine. 1982. “Reliability, Bias, or Quality: What is the Issue?”The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Porter, Alan, Daryl Chubin, Frederick Rossini, M.E. Boeckmann, and Terry Connolly. 1982. “The Role of the Dissertation in Scientific Careers.”American Scientist 70:475–81.Google Scholar
  21. Price, Derek J. DeSolla. 1963.Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Reskin, Barbara. 1977. “Scientific Productivity and the Reward Structure of Science.”American Sociological Review 42:491–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smigel, Erwin and Laurence Ross. 1970. “Factors in the Editorial Decision.”American Sociologist 5:19–21.Google Scholar
  24. Wanner, Richard, Lionel Lewis, and David Gregorio. 1981. “Research Productivity in Academia.”Sociology of Education 54:238–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson, Everett. 1979. “Comments from a Servant of the Scattered Family.”Contemporary Sociology 8:804–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Frank Fox
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park

Personalised recommendations