Advertisement

“Mobile statuary”: Refractions of pantomime dancing from Callistratus to Emma Hamilton and Andrew Ducrow

  • Ismene Lada-Richards
Article

Abstract

In this article I look at the European legacy of Graeco-Roman pantomime dancing through the prism of statuary. Starting from the late antiqueDescriptiones of the sophist and art critic Callistratus, a text which, as I argue, is mediated by the aesthetic experience and performance practice of the pantomime stage, I consider some fascinating early modern ways of coupling theatricalmimesis with the plastic arts, namely, the so-called “Attitudes” of Lady Emma Hamilton and the equestrian pantomimes of Andrew Ducrow. What they share with ancient pantomime is the art of building character and passion through mute corporeal eloquence as well as the thrilling experience of bridging the statuesqueness of the plastic arts and the unfolding narrative of the dramatic stage, a blend which was a distinctive feature of ancient pantomime dancing.

Keywords

Classical Tradition British Museum Aesthetic Experience Contemporary Account Inert Matter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altick, R. D. (1978),The Shows of London, Cambridge, MA and London, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baehrens, A. (1882),Poetae Latini Minores, vol. 4, ser. Bibliotheca scriptorum Graecorum et Romanorum Teubneriana, Lipsiae: Teubner.Google Scholar
  3. Bann, S. (1989),The True Vine: On Visual Representation and the Western Tradition, ser. Cambridge New Art History and Criticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Belting, H. (1994).Likeness and Presence: A History of the Image before the Era of Art, transl. E. Jephcott. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press (orig.Bild und Kult: eine Geschichte des Bildes vor dem Zeitalter der Kunst, München: C. H. Beck, 1990).Google Scholar
  5. Boigne, C.L.E.A., comtesse de (1907),Récits d’une tante. Mémoires de la comtesse de Boigne néc d’Osmond, publiés d’après le manuscrit original, par m. Charles Nicoullaud, I,1781–1814, Duxième édition, Paris: Librairie Plon.Google Scholar
  6. Boigne, C.L.E.A., comtesse de (1907),Memoirs of the Comtesse de Boigne I,1781–1814, edited from the original ms. by M. Charles Nicoullaud, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  7. Boigne, C.L.E.A., comtesse de (1986),Mémoires de la Comtesse de Boigne née d’Osmond. Récits d’une tante, Édition présentée et annotée par Jean-Claude Berchet, I,Du règne de Louis XVI à 1820, Paris: Mercure de France.Google Scholar
  8. Bonaria, M. (1955),Mimorum Romanorum Fragmenta, fasc. II.Fasti Mimici et Pantomimici, Pubblicazioni dell’Istituto di Filologia Classica 5, Genova: Istituto di Filologia Classica.Google Scholar
  9. Bonaria, M. (1965),Romani Mimi, Poetarum Latinorum reliquiae. Aetas rei publicae 6.2, Rome: Athenai.Google Scholar
  10. Booth, M. R. (1981),Victorian Spectacular Theatre, 1850–1910, Theatre Production Series, London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  11. Böttiger, K.A. (1998).Literarische Zustände und Zeitgenossen: Begegnungen und Gespräche im Klassischen Weimar, hrsg. v. Klaus Gerlach u. René Sternke, 3. Aufl., Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Brownstein, R. M. (1995).Tragic Muse: Rachel of the Comédie-Française, Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bryson, N. (1990).Looking at the Overlooked: Four Essays on Still Life Painting, London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  14. Cheshire, D. F. (1983), “Eroticism in the Performing Arts,” in P. Webb (ed.),The Erotic Arts, new edn., London: Secker and Warburg, 297–328.Google Scholar
  15. Coquelin, C. (1880),L’Art et le comédien, Paris: Paul Ollendorf.Google Scholar
  16. Coquelin, C. (1915),Art and the Actor, transl. by A. L. Alger, with an introduction by Henry James, Publications of the Dramatic Museum…, 2nd ser., Papers on Acting 2, New York: Dramatic Museum of Columbia University.Google Scholar
  17. Darwin, E. (1789).The Botanic Garden, part II, containing The Loves of the Plants, a Poem with Philosophical Notes, Lichfield: J. Jackson.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, T.C. (1991).Actresses as Working Women: Their Social Identity in Victorian Culture, ser. Gender and Performance, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Decroux, E. (1985),Words on Mime, transl. M. Piper, ser.Mime Journal 1985, Claremont: Pomona College Theatre Department (orig.Paroles sur le mime, 2nd ed., Paris: Librairie Théâtrale, 1977).Google Scholar
  20. DeLacy, P. (1952), “Biography and Tragedy in Plutarch,”American Journal of Philology 73: 159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duncan, I. (1928),My Life, London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
  22. Elsner, J. (1991), “VisualMimesis and the Myth of the Real: Ovid’s Pygmalion as Viewer,”Ramus 20: 154–68.Google Scholar
  23. Elsner, J. (1995),Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity, ser. Cambridge Studies in New Art History and Criticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Elsner, J. (1996a), “Naturalism and the Erotics of the Gaze: Intimations of Narcissus,” in N. Boymel Kampen (ed.),Sexuality in Ancient Art, ser. Cambridge Studies in New Art History and Criticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 247–61.Google Scholar
  25. Elsner, J. (1996b), “Image and Ritual: Reflections on the Religious Appreciation of Classical Art,”Classical Quarterly 46: 515–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elsner, J. (1998),Imperial Rome and Christian Triumph: the Art of the Roman Empire AD 100–450, ser. Oxford History of Art, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Elsner, J. (2000), “Between Mimesis and Divine Power: Visuality in the Greco-Roman World,” in R. S. Nelson (ed.),Visuality Before and Beyond the Renaissance: Seeing as Others Saw, ser. Cambridge Studies in New Art History and Criticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45–69.Google Scholar
  28. Fairbanks, A. (1931),Philostratus’ Imagines; Callistratus’ Descriptions, ser. Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Foakes, R. A. (ed.) (1989),Coleridge’s Criticism of Shakespeare, London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  30. Forter, S. L. (1996),Choreography and Narrative: Ballet’s Staging of Story and Desire, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Fraser, F. (1999),Beloved Emma: The Life of Emma, Lady Hamilton, London: Papermac.Google Scholar
  32. Freedberg, D. (1989),The Power of Images: Studies in the History and Theory of Response, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gildon, C. (1710),Life of Mr Thomas Betterton, London: Robert-Gosling.Google Scholar
  34. Goethe, J. W. (1950),Die Italienische Reise: Die Annalen, inGedenkausgabe der Werke, Briefe und Gespräche, herausgegeben von Ernst Beutler, vol. 11, Zürich: Artemis-Verlag.Google Scholar
  35. Goethe, J. W. (1982),Italian Journey 1786–1788, transl. W. H. Auden and E. Mayer, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. Golder, H. (1996), “Making a Scene: Gesture, Tableau, and the Tragic Chorus,”Arion 4. 1: 1–19.Google Scholar
  37. Gombrich, E. H. (1960),Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, Bollingen Series 35 = The A.W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts 5, Oxford: Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gombrich, E. H. (1964), “Moment and Movement in Art,”Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institute 27: 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gordon, R. L. (1979), “The Real and the Imaginary: Production and Religion in the Graeco-Roman World,”Art History 2, 1: 5–34.Google Scholar
  40. Guest, I. (1996),The Ballet of the Enlightenment: The Establishment of the Ballet d’Action in France, 1770–1793, London: Dance Books.Google Scholar
  41. Hall, E. (1988), “Introduction,” inEuripides’ Medea and Other Plays, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hall, E. (1999a), “Classical Mythology in the Victorian Popular Theatre,”International Journal of the Classical Tradition 5: 336–66.Google Scholar
  43. Hall, E. (1999b), “Actor’s Song in Tragedy,” in S. Goldhill and R. Osborne (eds.),Performance Culture and Athenian Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 96–122.Google Scholar
  44. Hall, E. (2002), “The Singing Actors of Antiquity,” in P. E. Easterling and E. Hall (eds.),Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–38.Google Scholar
  45. Halliwell, S. (2002),The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Hardie, P. (2002),Ovid’s Poetics of Illusion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Hill, J. (1755),The Actor: or a Treatise on the Art of Playing, London: R. Griffiths.Google Scholar
  48. Holmström, K. G. (1967),Monodrama, Attitudes, Tableaux Vivants: Studies on Some Trends of Theatrical Fashion 1770–1815, Acta Universitatis Stockholmiensis. Stockholm Studies in Theatrical History 1, Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
  49. James, L. and Webb, R. (1991), “‘To Understand Ultimate Things and Enter Secret Places’:Ekphrasis and Art in Byzantium,”Art History 14: 1–17.Google Scholar
  50. Jenkins, I. and Sloan, K. (1996),Vases and Volcanoes: Sir William Hamilton and his Collection, London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
  51. Jenkyns, R. (1991),Dignity and Decadence: Victorian Art and the Classical Inheritance, London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  52. Jory, E. J. (1981), “The Literary Evidence for the Beginnings of Imperial Pantomime,”Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 28: 147–61.Google Scholar
  53. Jory, E. J. (1996), “The Drama of the Dance: Prolegomena to an Iconography of Imperial Pantomime,” in W. J. Slater (ed.),Roman Theater and Society: E. Togo Salmon Papers I, Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 1–27.Google Scholar
  54. Jory, E. J. (2001), “Some Cases of Mistaken Identity? Pantomime Masks and their Context,”Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 45: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kannicht, R. (1969),Euripides Helena, Band II:Kommentar, ser. Wissenschaftliche Kommentare zu griechischen und lateinischen Schriftstellern, Heidelberg: Carl Winter-Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  56. Kokolakis, M. (1959), “Pantomimus and the Treatise {ie35-1} (De Saltatione),”Platon 11: 3–56.Google Scholar
  57. Lada-Richards, I. (2002), “The Subjectivity of Greek Performance,” in P. Easterling and E. Hall (eds.),Greek and Roman Actors: Aspects of an Ancient Profession, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 395–418.Google Scholar
  58. Lada-Richards, I. (2003), “‘A Worthless Feminine Thing’? Lucian and the ‘Optic Intoxication’ of Pantomime Dancing,”Helios 30: 21–75.Google Scholar
  59. Leppin, H. (1992),Histrionen. Untersuchungen zur sozialen Stellung von Bühnenkünstlern im Westen des Römischen Reiches zur Zeit der Republik und des Principats, Antiquitas. Reihe 1, Abhändlungen zur alten Geschichte 41, Bonn: R. Habelt.Google Scholar
  60. Lifar, S. (1951),Lifar on Classical Ballet, transl. from the French by D. M. Dinwiddie, London: A. Wingate (orig.Traité de danse académique, Paris: Bordas, 1949).Google Scholar
  61. Lynham, D. (1950),The Chevalier Noverre, Father of Modern Ballet, London: Sylvan Press and New York: British Book Centre.Google Scholar
  62. Marshall, G. (1998),Actresses on the Victorian Stage: Feminine Performance and the Galatea Myth, Cambridge Studies in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture 16, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. McCullough, J. W. (1981),Living Pictures on the New York Stage, Theater and Dramatic Studies 13, Epping: Bowker.Google Scholar
  64. MacDougall, A. R. (1977), “Isadora Duncan and the Artists,” in P. Magriel (ed.),Nijinsky, Pavlova, Duncan: Three Lives in Dance, ser. The Lyric Stage, New York: Da Capo Press, 35–63.Google Scholar
  65. Montiglio, S. (1999), “Paroles dansées en silence: L’action signifiante de la pantomime et le moi du danseur,”Phoenix 53: 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Moody, J. (2000),Illegitimate Theatre in London, 1770–1840, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Morris, S. P. (1992),Daidalos and the Origins of Greek Art, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Mossman, J. M. (1991), “Plutarch’s Use of Statues,” in M. A. Flower and M. Toher (eds.),Georgica: Greek Studies in Honour of George Cawkwell, BICS Supplement 58, London: University of London Institute of Classical Studies, 98–119.Google Scholar
  69. Noverre, J. G. (1930),Letters on Dancing and Ballets, transl. C. W. Beaumont (from the Revised and Englarged Edition published at St. Petersburg, 1803), London: C. W. Beaumont.Google Scholar
  70. Ovid, transl. Melville, A. D. (1986),Ovid’s Metamorphoses, ser. Oxford World’s Classics, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Pollitt, J. J. (1974),The Ancient View of Greek Art: Criticism, History and Terminology, Yale Publications in the History of Art 25, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Pollitt, J. J. (1986),Art in the Hellenistic Age, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Potts, A. (2000),The Sculptural Imagination: Figurative, Modernist, Minimalist, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Pückler-Muskau, H. von (1831),Briefe eines Verstorbenen. Ein fragmentarisches Tagebuch aus England, Wales, Irland und Frankreich, geschrieben in den Jahren 1828 und 1829, 2e Aufl., II, Stuttgart: Hallberger’sche, vormals Franckh’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
  75. Pückler-Musskau, H. von (1833),Tour in England, Ireland, and France, in the years 1828, and 1829. With remarks on the manners and customs of the inhabitants, and anecdotes of distinguished public characters. In a series of letters. By a German prince, transl. S. Austin, Philadelphia: Carey, Lea and Blanchard.Google Scholar
  76. Pückler-Muskau, H. von (1992),Reisebriefe aus England und Irland. Eine Auswahl aus den ≫Briefen eines Verstorbenen≪ in zwei Bänden, ed. T. Erler, 2, Berlin and Weimar: Aufbau-Verlag.Google Scholar
  77. Ralph, R. (1985),The Life and Works of John Weaver, London: Dance Books.Google Scholar
  78. Redford, B. (2003), “‘Grecian Taste and Roman Spirit’: The Society of Dilettanti on Classical Ground,” in P. Thibodeau and Harry Heskell (eds.),Being There Together: Essays in Honor of Michael C.J. Putnam on the Occasion of His Seventieth Birthday, Afton, Minnesota: Afton Historical Society Press, 258–274.Google Scholar
  79. Reich, H. (1903),Der Mimus. Berlin: Weidmann (repr. Hildesheim and New York: G. Olms, 1974).Google Scholar
  80. Robert, L. (1930), “Pantomimen im griechischen Orient,”Hermes 65: 106–22.Google Scholar
  81. Rosati, G. (1983),Narciso e Pigmalione: Illusione e Spettacolo nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio, ser. Nuovi Saggi, Firenze: Sansoni Editore.Google Scholar
  82. Ruyter, N. L. C. (1996), “Geneviève Stebbins and American Delsartean Performance,” in S. L. Foster (ed.),Corporealities: Knowledge, Culture and Power, London and New York: Routledge, 70–89.Google Scholar
  83. Saxon, A. H. (1968),Enter Foot and Horse: A History of Hippodrama in England and France, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Saxon, A. H. (1978),The Life and Art of Andrew Ducrow and the Romantic Age of the English Circus, Hamden, Connecticut: Archon Books.Google Scholar
  85. Senelick, L. (1997),Tavern Singing in Early Victorian London: The Diaries of Charles Rice for 1840 and 1850, London: The Society for Theatre Research.Google Scholar
  86. Sklar, D. (1995), “Etienne Decroux’s Promethean Mime,” in: P. B. Zarrilli, (ed.),Acting (Re)considered: Theories and Practices, ser. Worlds of Performance, London and New York: Routledge, 108–20.Google Scholar
  87. Slater, W. J. (1993), “Three Problems in the History of Drama,”Phoenix 47: 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Slater, W. J. (1994), “Pantomime Riots,”Classical Antiquity 13: 120–44.Google Scholar
  89. Solodow, J. B. (1988),The World of Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  90. Spivey, N. (1995), “Bionic Statues,” in A. Powell (ed.),The Greek World, London and New York: Routledge, 442–62.Google Scholar
  91. Sprague, A. C. and Shuttleworth, B. (1950),The London Theatre in the Eighteen-Thirties, by Charles Rice, London: The Society for Theatre Research.Google Scholar
  92. Stephanis, I. E. (1988),37-1, Heraklion: Crete University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Steiner, D. T. (2001),Images in Mind: Statues in Archaic and Classical Greek Literature and Thought, Princeton and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. Taylor, G. (1989),Players and Performances in the Victorian Theatre. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Tours, H. (1963),The Life and Letters of Emma Hamilton, London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
  96. Vigée-Le Brun, E. (1989),The Memoirs of Elisabeth Vigée-Le Brun, transl. from the French by S. Evans, ser. Women on Art, London: Camden Press (orig.Souvenirs de Madame Louise-Elisabeth Vigée-Lebrun, Paris, Charpentier, 1869).Google Scholar
  97. Watson, G. (1994), “The Concept of ‘Phantasia’ from the Late Hellenistic Period to Early Neoplatonism,” in W. Haase (ed.),Aufstieg und Niedergang der Römischen Welt/Rise and Decline of the Roman World (=ANRW) II, 36. 7, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 4765–4810.Google Scholar
  98. Webb, R. (1999), “Ekphrasis Ancient and Modern: the Invention of a Genre,“World and Image 15. 1: 7–18.Google Scholar
  99. Weinreich, O. (1948),Epigramm und Pantomimus, Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften. Philosophisch-historische Klasse. Jahrg. 1944/48. Abhandlung 1, Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
  100. Wheeler, S. M. (1999),A Discourse of Wonders: Audience and Performance in Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  101. Winter, M. H. (1974),The Pre-Romantic Ballet, London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  102. Zeitlin, F. I. (1994), “The Artful Eye: Vision,Ecphrasis and Spectacle in Euripidean Theatre,” in S. Goldhill and R. Osborne (eds),Art and Text in Greek Culture, ser. Cambridge Studies in New Art History and Criticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 138–96.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ismene Lada-Richards
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ClassicsKing’s College LondonStrandUK

Personalised recommendations