From “shattered mummies” to “an epic life”: Casaubon’s key to all mythologies and Dorothea’s mythic renewal in George Eliot’sMiddlemarch

  • Roger Travis
Article

Abstract

The emergence over the course of George Eliot’sMiddlemarch of Dorothea Brooke as a new sort of epic hero clearly has much to do with her character’s starting point in an ill-suited marriage to the elderly cleric Edward Casaubon. The present paper argues that Casaubon’s unachieved life’s work,The Key to All Mythologies, functions very precisely in the novel as a textual, mythic figure against which, and even through which, Dorothea’s new character is defined.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works Cited

  1. Adam, I., ed. 1975.This Particular Web: Essays on Middlemarch. Toronto.Google Scholar
  2. Beer, G. 1983.Darwin’s Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darvin, George Eliot and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. London.Google Scholar
  3. Benardete, S. G. 1969.Herodotean Inquiries. The Hague.Google Scholar
  4. Blake, K. 1976. “Middlemarch and the Woman Question”—Nineteenth-Century Fiction 31.Google Scholar
  5. Bonaparte, F. 1980. “Middlemarch: The Genesis of Myth in the English Novel: The Relationship Between Literary Form and the Modern Predicament.”Notre Dame English Journal 8: 106–154.Google Scholar
  6. Chaudhuri, N.C. 1974.Scholar Extraordinary. The Life of Professor the Rt. Hon. Friedrich Max Müller, P.C. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
  7. Delz, J. 1997. “Textkritik und Editionstechnik.” InEinleitung in die lateinische Philologie, ed. F. Graf, 51–73. Stuttgart and Leipzig.Google Scholar
  8. Ellmann, R. 1973. “Dorothea’s Husbands: Some Biographical Speculations.”Times Literary Supplement 16 Feb.: 165–68; 30 March: 352–53.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, J.A.S. 1955. “Herodotus and the Gyges Drama.”Athenaeum 33: 333–36.Google Scholar
  10. Feueerbach, L. 1854.The Essence of Christianity. Tr. M. Evans (George Eliot). London. [orig. German asDas Wesen des Christentums. Leipzig 1841.]Google Scholar
  11. Gordon, J. 1980. “Origins,Middlemarch, endings: George Eliot’s crisis of the antecedent.” In Anne Smith, ed.,George Eliot: Centenary essays and an unpublished fragment. London.Google Scholar
  12. Gordon, L. 1997. “Greek Scholarship and Renaissance Florence in George Eliot’sRomola.” InGeorge Eliot and Europe, ed. J. Rignall, 179–89. Aldershot, Hants.Google Scholar
  13. Hardy, B. 1975. “Middlemarch and the Passions.” In Adam 1975, 3–21.Google Scholar
  14. Harvey, W.J. 1967. “Casaubon and Lydgate.” In Middlemarch:Critical Approaches to the Novel, ed. B. Hardy, 25–37. London.Google Scholar
  15. Hertz, N. 1979. “Recognizing Casaubon.”Glyph 6: 22–41.Google Scholar
  16. Kitchel, Anna, ed. 1950.A Quarry for Middlemarch. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  17. Knoepflmacher, U. C. 1975. “Fusing fact and myth: the new reality ofMiddlemarch.” In Adam 1975, 43–72Google Scholar
  18. Lesky, A. 1956.Die tragische Dichtung der Hellenen. Studienhefte zur Altertunswissenschaft 2. Göttingen. [3rd ed., ibid. 1972; in English asGreek Tragic Poetry, New Haven 1983].Google Scholar
  19. Lloyd-Jones, H. 1966. “Problems of Early Greek Tragedy.” InEstudio sobre la tragedia Griega, Cuadermos de la Fundación Pastor 13, 11–33. Madrid. [reprinted in H. Lloyd-Jones,Greek Epic, Lyric, and Tragedy. The Acadmic Papers of Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones, Oxford 1990. 225–237.]Google Scholar
  20. Lloyd-Jones, H. 1982.Blood for the Ghosts. Classical Influences in the Ninteenth and Twentieth Centuries. London.Google Scholar
  21. Müller, F. M. 1861–64.Lectures on the Science of Language. 1st and 2nd series. London.Google Scholar
  22. Nagy, G. 1996.Poetry as Performance: Homer and beyond. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  23. Olender, M. 1992. “The Danger of Ambiguity: Friedrich Max Müller.” In Idem.The Languages of Paradise: Race, Religion and Philology in the Nineteenth Century. Tr. A. Goldhammer, 82–92. Cambridge, MA. [orig. French asLes langues du paradis, Paris 1989.]Google Scholar
  24. Page, D. 1951.A New Chapter in the History of Greek Tragedy. Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
  25. Pratt, John Clark, and Neufeldt, Victor A., eds. 1979.George Eliot’s MiddlemarchNotebooks: A Transcription. BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  26. Raubitschek, A.E. 1954. “Gyges in Herodotus.”Classical World 48: 48–50.Google Scholar
  27. Reynolds, L.D. and N.G. Wilson. 1991.Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek & Latin Literature. 3rd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Sandys, J.E. 1903–8.A History of Classical Scholarship. 3 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. Timpanaro, S. 1981.La genesi del metodo del Lachmann. 2nd ed. Florence.Google Scholar
  30. Vandiver, E. 1991,Heroes in Herodotus: the Interaction of Myth and History. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  31. Wiesenfarth, J. 1977.George Eliot’s Mythmaking. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  32. Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1982.History of Classical Scholarship. Tr. A. Harris Ed. with intro. and notes H. Lloyd-Jones. Baltimore [orig. German ed.Geschichte der Philologie, Leipzig 1921].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger Travis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Modern and Classical LanguagesUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations