International patron-client relationships: A conceptual framework
Dependency theory has cast new light on the workings of the international political economy, and on the relations between more and less developed countries. Insofar as dependency theory aims at specifying generalsystemic constraints on the behavior of Third World states, its ability to explain/predict how particular Third World states respond to these constraints is limited.
Our concern is with the foreign policy responses of the LDCs. The comparative foreign policy approach to this question has attempted to account for cross-national variation in foreign policy responses of LDCs with variation in theirdomestic features, i.e., attributes, capabilities, and regime types. Here we suggest that an understanding of the foreign policies of the LDCs can be enhanced by adding an explicitly dyadic perspective to dependency and comparative foreign policy approaches, conceptualized as a form of patron-cliency.
KeywordsForeign Policy Comparative International Development Dependency Theory American Political Science Review Compliant Behavior
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- AMIN, S. 1976Unequal Development: An Essay on the Social Formation of Peripheral Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
- CARDOSSO, F.H. and FALETTO, E. 1979Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- DUVERGER, MAURICE 1954Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Translated by North and North: New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
- EISENSTADT, S. and RONIGER, L. 1984Patrons, Clients, and Friends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- FEINBERG, RICHARD 1983The Intemperate Zone; The Third World Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
- FOSTER, GEORGE M. 1967 The Dyadic Contract: A Model for Social Structure of a Mexican Village. InPeasant Society: A Reader, pp. 213–230. Edited by J. Potter, M. Diaz, and G. Foster. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
- KEY, V.O. JR. 1952Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
- — 1956American State Politics: An Introduction. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
- KNORR, KLAUS 1975The Power of Nations. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- LASWELL, HAROLD D. 1951 Factions.Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. 6th ed.: 51.Google Scholar
- LISKA, GEORGE 1978Career of Empire: America and Imperial Expansion Over Land and Sea. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- MAIR, LUCY 1961 Clientship in East Africa.Cahiers d’Etudes Africaines 2: 315–326.Google Scholar
- SHOEMAKER, C. and SPANIER, J. 1984Patron-Client State Relationships. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- SINGER, MARSHALL R. 1972Weak States in a World of Powers: The Dynamics of International Relationships. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- SPIEGEL, STEVEN L. 1972Dominance and Diversity. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
- TUCKER, ROBERT W. 1968Nation or Empire?: The Debate Over American Foreign Policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- WATERBURY, JOHN 1977 An Attempt to Put Patrons and Clients in Their Place. In Gellner and Waterbury, eds.,Patrons and Clients, 329–341. London, Gerald Duckworth and Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
- WOLF, ERIC 1966 Kinship, Friendship, and Patron-Client Relations. In M. Banton, ed.,The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies, 3–27. New York: Little, Brown.Google Scholar