Faking personality questionnaires: Fabricating different profiles for different purposes
- 434 Downloads
Over fifty subjects completed four personality measures used in personnel selection. Based on a latin-square design they were asked to fill them in as they would if they were trying to present themselves as ideal candidates for the job of librarian, advertising executive or banker, while on one questionnaire they gave “honest,” actual responses. The results indicated, as previous research in this area has shown, that the questionnaires are all highly susceptible to faking, and that a quite different prototypic profile arose for each of the three different jobs. The results are discussed in terms of the templates of fakers for specific jobs; the methods of detecting fakers, and what dissimulation studies tell us about theories of both occupations and personality.
KeywordsCurrent Psychology Personality Test Personality Measure Personality Questionnaire Preference Inventory
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Briggs-Myers, L., & McCauley, M. (1985).A Guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
- Cattell, R. (1969).The 16 PF, Form D, 1969 Edition, Windsor; N.F.E.R. Furnham, A. (1986A). The Social responsibility of the Type A behaviour pattern.Psychological Medicine, 16, 805–811.Google Scholar
- Furnham, A. (1986).Lay Theories. Pergamon: Oxford.Google Scholar
- Furnham, A. (1990). The fakeability of the 16 PF, Myers-Briggs and FIRO-B personality measures.Personality and Individual Differences. In Press.Google Scholar
- Kirton, M. (1976). Adaptors and Innovators: A description and measure.Journal of Applied Psychology, 622–629.Google Scholar
- Kostick, M. (1977).Kosticks Perception and Preference Inventory. Brookline, Mass.: Applied Psychology Associates.Google Scholar
- Holland, J. (1973).Making Vocational Choices: A theory of Careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Holland, J. (1985).Vocational Preferences Inventory. Odessa, Florida: PAR Inc.Google Scholar
- Myers, I., & McCauley, M. (1985).Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto: CPP.Google Scholar
- Robertson, I., & Makin, P. (1986). Management selection in Britain: A survey and critique.Journal of Occupational Psychology, 59, 45–57.Google Scholar
- Velicer, W., & Weiner, B. (1975). Effects of sophistication and faking sets on the Eysenck Personality Inventory.Psychological Reports, 37, 71–73.Google Scholar