Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Emperor’s new clothes: Labor reform and social democratization in Chile

  • Articles
  • Published:
Studies in Comparative International Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article analyzes the relationship between political and social democratization in recent democratic transitions by illustrating how the two processes were at odds in the case of labor reform in Chile (1990–2001). Labor reform served simultaneously to consolidate political democracy and slow down the momentum of social democratization. It was a tool for signalling policy change to legitimate the democratic regime, but at the same time leaving the liberal economy intact. The Chilean case calls into question the thesis of a natural progression from political to social rights prevalent in democratic theory, and allows us to generalize about the way marketization places limits on democratic deepening. The article first discusses what would be appropriate criteria of social democratization considering contemporary labor issues and labor relations in Chile. It then investigates the political process of labor reform. Ongoing legal debates through the 1990s show the extent of path dependence set in motion by the timid nature of the first social reforms in Chile’s new demoncracy and their muting effect on citizenship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angell, A. 1972.Politics and the Labour Movement in Chile. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1988. “Some Problems in the Interpretation of Recent Chilean History.”Bulletin of Latin American Research 7, 1: 91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2000. “The Chilean Presidential Elections of 1999/2000 and the Consolidation of Democracy.”Bulletin of Latin American Research 19, 3: 357–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, R. 1995.Economic Democracy—The Politics of Feasible Socialism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baglioni, G. and C. Crouch, eds. 1990.European Industrial Relations—The Challenge of Flexibility. London, Newbury Park: New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, M. 1994. “La Negociación colectiva en Chile—Una Decentralización excesiva” (December).Materiales de Discusión, Centro de Estudios Sociales.

  • Brunhes, B. 1989.Labour Market Flexibility: Trends in Enterprises. Paris: Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R. B. and D. Collier. 1991.Shaping the Political Arena—Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Concertación. 1989.Programa de gobierno—Concertación de partidos por la democracia. Santiago, Chile.

  • Cortázar, R. 1991. “El Juego de confianza y los orígenes de la acción colectiva”.Colección Estudios Cieplan 33 (December): 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corte Supremo—Recurso de Queja: Asociación de Abogados Laboralistas de Chile (AALC). 1990.Comentarios al proyecto de ley referido a las normas sobre terminación del contrato de trabajo (July). Santiago, Chile: AALC.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPC (Confederación de le Producción y el Comercio) 1990. “Minuta—Terminación del contrato de trabajo. Respuesta de la confederación” (meeting notes for Commission No. 1. Spring Labor Commissions). Santiago, Chile.

  • CUT (Central Unitaria de Trabajadores). 1990. “Sobre proyecto de ley que establece nuevas normas sobre terminación del contrato de trabajo y estabilidad en el empleo.” Presentation before the Labor Commission (Comisión de Trabajo) of the Senate, 24 July. Santiago, Chile.

  • CUT (Central Unitaria de Trabajadores). 1992. “Minuta sobre reformas jurídicas, impulsadas por la Central Unitaria de Trabajadores” (Spring). Santiago, Chile.

  • Dahl, R. 1971.Polyarchy—Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1985.A Preface to Economic Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, E. 1985. “La Concertación social desde una perspectiva sindical de Izquierda” inConcertación Social y Democracia, Santiago: CED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore, R. 1986.Flexible Rigidities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haagh, L. 2002.Citizenship, Labour Markets and Democratisation—Chile and the Modern Sequence. Oxford, London: Macmillan-St. Antony's.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2001. “The Challenge of Labor Reform in Korea: A Review of Contrasting Approaches to Market Enhancement.” Pp. 386–419 inLabor Market Reforms and Financial Crisis in Korea. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haagh, L. Forthcoming. “Social Policy and Themes, in Market Governance in Latin America” inSocial Policy Reform and Market Governance in Latin America, ed. L. Haagh and C. Helgø. Oxford, London: Macmillan-St. Antony's.

  • — 1999. “Training Policy and the Property Rights of Labour in Chile (1990–1997): Social Citizenship in the Atomised Market Regime”.Journal of Latin American Studies 31: 429–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haagh, L. 1998. “Re-democratisation, Labour Relations and the Development of Human Resources in Chile.” D. Phil thesis, University of Oxford.

  • Hirschman, A. O. 1993. “The Rhetoric of Reaction—Two Years Later”Government and Opposition 28, 3: 292–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Labor Office, CINTERFOR. 1990.La Formación profesional en el umbral, de los 90, Vol. I. Montevideo: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labor Office. 1999. Employment and Training Papers 44, 52, 53, 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1998.Chile—crecimieno, empleo y el desafío de la justicia social. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1992.World Labour Report, Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. H. 1992. “Trust and the Flexible Firm: International Comparisons”.Industrial Relations 321, 3 (Fall): 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, C.B. 1973.Democratic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. 1966 [1890].Principles of Economics: An Introductory Volume. 8th Edition. London, Melbourne, Toronto: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. 1950.Citizenship and Social Class—And other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. 1982 [1859].On Liberty. Bungay, Suffolk: Richard Clay, The Chaucer Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 1999.Principles of Social Justice, Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Labor, Republic of Korea. 1997.Statement on Employment Insurance in Korea. Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Labor, Chile. 1990. “Memorandum: Principales controversias respecto de las modificaciones a la legislación laboral. Proyecto: Negociación colectiva” (July). Santiago, Chile: Ministry of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales Moya, Carlos A., ed.Nuevo Código del Trabajo 1991. Chile: Ediciones Publiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, U. 1991. “Property Rights, Asset Specificity, and the Division of Labour under Alternative Capitalist Relations.”Cambridge Journal of Economics 15: 315–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. 1987.The Theory of Democracy Revisited—Part One: The Contemporary Debate. New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, T. W. 1993.The Economics of Being Poor. Oxford, Cambridge, USA. Blackwells.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1999.Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senado de Chile. 1990. “Proyecto de ley que establece normas sobre organisaciones sindicales y negociación colectiva.” P. 660 inHistória de la ley no. 19.069. Sesión 10. Anexo de documentos,Diario de sesiones del Senado, Valparaíso, Chile.

  • Senado de Chile. 1990. “Proyecto de ley que establece nuevas normas sobre terminación del contrato de trabajo y estabilidad en el empleo.” P. 1179 inHistoria de la ley no. 19.010. Sesion 17, Anexo de documentos,Diario de sesiones del Senado, Valparaíso, Chile.

  • Streeck, W. 1989. “Skills and the Limits of Neo-Liberalism: The Enterprise of the Future as a Place of Learning.”Work, Employment and Society 3, 1 (March): 105–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1985.Philosophy and the Human Sciences—Philosophical Papers—Two. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer Arteaga, W. 1991.Sindicatos y negociación colectiva—Análisis de la nueva legislación, ley no. 19.069. Santiago, Chile: Colección Manuales Jurídicos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, J. S. 1988. “Labor Movements in Transitions to Democracy: A Framework for Analysis.” Working Paper #104 (June), Kellogg Institute for International Studies, University of Notre Dame.

  • Valenzuela, J. S. 1992. “Democratic Consolidation in Post-Transitional Settings: Notions, Process, and Facilitating Conditions” Pp. 57–104 inIssues in Democratic Consolidation, eds. S. Mainwaring, G. O'Donnell and S. Valenzuela. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. 1986. “Macro-economic Implications of Profit-Sharing” inMacroeconomic Annual, ed. S. Fisher. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. 1985.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O., M. Wachter, and J. Harris. 1986. “Understanding the Employment Relation: The Analysis of Idiosyncratic Exchange” inThe Economic Nature of the Firm, ed. L. Putterman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Louise Haagh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Louise Haagh obtained her doctorate from the University of Oxford (St. Antony’s College) in 1998, and for the next three years held a British Academy Postdoctoral Research Fellowship at the College. In 2001 she began a lectureship at the University of York.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haagh, L. The Emperor’s new clothes: Labor reform and social democratization in Chile. St Comp Int Dev 37, 86–115 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686339

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686339

Keywords

Search

Navigation