Advertisement

Industrial convergence, globalization, and the persistence of the North-South divide

  • Giovanni Arrighi
  • Beverly J. Silver
  • Benjamin D. Brewer
Articles

Abstract

This article demonstrates empirically that widespread convergence in the degree of industrialization between former First and Third World countries over the past four decades hasnot been associated with convergence in the levels of income enjoyed on average by the residents of these two groups of countries. Our findings contradict the widely made claim that the significance of the North-South divide is diminishing. This contention is based on a false identification of “industrialization” with “development” and “industrialized” with “wealthy”. Elaborating from elements of Joseph Schumpeter’s theory of innovation, Raymond Vernon’s product cycle model, and Pierre Bourdieu’s concept ofillusio, the article offers an explanation for the persistence of the North-South income divide, despite rapid Third World industrialization and despite dramatic changes in the world political-ideological context for development (that is, the shift around 1980 from the “development” project to the “globalization” project or “Washington Consensus”). While emphasizing the long-term stability of the Northern-dominated hierarchy of wealth, the article concludes by pointing to several contemporary processes that may destabilize not only the “globalization project”, but also the global hierarchy of wealth that has characterized historical capitalism.

Keywords

Income Inequality Comparative International Development Competitive Pressure World Country Wealthy Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abramovitz, Moses. 1986. “Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind”.Journal of Economic History 46: 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akamatsu, K. 1961. “A Theory of Unbalanced Growth in the World Economy”.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 86, 1: 196–217.Google Scholar
  3. Alderson, Arthur S. 1999. “Explaining Deindustrialization: Globalization, Failure or Success?”American Sociological Review 64: 701–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amsden, Alice. 2001.The Rise of “The Rest”. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arrighi, Giovanni. 1991. “World Income Inequality and the Future of Socialism”.New Left Review 189: 39–64.Google Scholar
  6. —. 1994.The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. —. 2002. “The African Crisis: World Systemic and Regional Aspects”.New Left Review 15: 5–36.Google Scholar
  8. Arrighi, Giovanni and Jessica Drangel. 1986. “The Stratification of the World-Economy: An Exploration of the Semiperipheral Zone”.Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 10,1: 9–74.Google Scholar
  9. Arrighi, Giovanni, Po-Keung Hui, Ho-Fung Hung, and Mark Selden. 2003. “Historical Capitalism, East and West”. InThe Resurgence of East Asia: 500, 150, 50 Year Perspectives, eds. G. Arrighi, T. Hamashita, and M. Selden. London and New York: Routledge (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  10. Arrighi, Giovanni and Beverly J. Silver, with I. Ahmad, K. Barr, S. Hisaeda, P. Hui, K. Ray, T. Reifer, M. Shih, E. Slater. 1999.Chaos and Governance in the Modern World System. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Arrighi, Giovanni and Beverly J. Silver. 1999. “Hegemonic Transitions: A Rejoinder”.Political Power and Social Theory 13: 307–315.Google Scholar
  12. Baumol, William J. 1967. “Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: The Anatomy of Urban Crisis”.American Economic Review 57, 3: 415–26.Google Scholar
  13. Baumol, W.J., S.A.B. Blackman and E.N. Wolff. 1989.Productivity and American Leadership: The Long View. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bell, Daniel. 1973.The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Bienefeld, Manfred. 2000. “Structural Adjustment: Debt Collection Device or Development Policy?”Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 23, 4: 533–82.Google Scholar
  16. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984.Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bourdieu, Pierre and Jean-Claude Passeron. 1979.The Inheritors. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bourdieu, Pierre and Loic Wacquant. 1992.An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Bracking, Sarah. 1999. “Structural Adjustment: Why It Wasn’t Necessary and Why It Did Work”.Review of African Political Economy 80: 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brandt Commission. 1980.North-South: A Program for Survival. London: Pan Books.Google Scholar
  21. Brenner, Robert. 1998. “The Economics of Global Turbulence: A Special Report on the World Economy, 1950–1998”.New Left Review 229: 1–264.Google Scholar
  22. —. 2002.The Boom and the Bubble: The U.S. in the World Economy. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  23. Burbach, Roger and William I. Robinson. 1999. “The Fin de Siècle Debate: Globalization as Global Shift”.Science and Society 63: 1: 10–39.Google Scholar
  24. Chase-Dunn, Christopher. 1999. “Globalization: A world-Systems Perspective”.Journal of World-Systems Research 5, 2: 176–198.Google Scholar
  25. Clark, Colin. 1957.The Conditions of Economic Progress, 3rd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Conley, Dalton. 1999.Being Black, Living in the Red: Race, Wealth, and Social Policy in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Easterly, William. 2001. “The Lost Decades: Developing Countries’ Stagnation in Spite of Policy Reform 1980–1998”.Journal of Economic Growth 6: 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fingleton, Eamonn. 2001. “Quibble All You Like, Japan Still Looks Like a Strong Winner”.International Herald Tribune, January 2: 6.Google Scholar
  29. Firebaugh, Glen. 1999. “Empirics of World Income Inequality”.American Journal of Sociology 104, 6: 1597–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. —. 2001. “The Trend in Between-Nation Income Inequality”.Annual Review of Sociology 26: 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gereffi, Gary. 1994. “Rethinking Development Theory: Insights from East Asia and Latin America”. Pp. 26–56 inComparative National Development. Society and Economy in the New Global Order, eds. A. D. Kinkaid and A. Portes. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  32. Goesling, Brian. 2001. “Changing Income Inequalities within and between Nations: New Evidence”.American Sociological Review 66, 5: 745–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gore, Charles. 2000. “The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries”.World Development 28: 789–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hardt, Michael and Antonio Negri. 2000.Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Harris, Nigel. 1986.The End of the Third World. Newly Industrializing Countries and the Decline of an Ideology. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  36. Harrod, Roy. 1958. “The Possibility of Economic Satiety—Use of Economic Growth for Improving the Quality of Education and Leisure”. Pp. 207–13 inProblems of United States Economic Development, 1. New York: Committee for Economic Development.Google Scholar
  37. Held, David, Anthony McGrew, David Goldblatt and Jonathan Perraton. 1999.Global Transformations. Politics. Economics and Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hirsch, Fred. 1976.Social Limits to Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hoogvelt, Ankie. 1997.Globalization and the Postcolonial World: The New Political Economy of Development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hugill, Peter J. 1993.World Trade Since 1431: Geography, Technology and Capitalism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  41. International Monetary Fund. Various years.International Financial Statistics Yearbook. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  42. Jones, Charles I. 1997. “Convergence Revisited”.Journal of Economic Growth 2: 131–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Korzeniewicz, Roberto P. and Timothy P. Moran. 1997. “World-Economic Trends in the Distribution of Income, 1965–1992”.American Journal of Sociology 102, 4: 1000–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Krasner, Stephen D. 1985.Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  45. McMichael, Philip. 2000.Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Milanovic, Branko. 1999. “True World Income Distribution, 1988 and 1993”.Policy Research Working Paper 2244. Washington D.C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  47. Oliver, Melvin L. and Thomas M. Shapiro. 1995.Black Wealth/White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. O’Rourke, Kevin H. 2001. “Globalization and Inequality: Historical Trends”.NBER Working Paper Series 8339. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  49. Parboni, Riccardo. 1981.The Dollar and its Rivals. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  50. Peacock, Walter, Greg Hoover and Charles Killian. 1988. “Divergence and Convergence in International Development: A Decomposition Analysis of Inequality in the World System”.American Sociological Review 53: 838–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Riskin, Carl, Zhao Renwei and Li Shih. 2001.Retreat from Equality: Essays on the Changing Distribution of Income in China, 1988 to 1995. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  52. Robinson, William I. and Jerry Harris. 2000. “Towards A Global Ruling Class? Globalization and the Transnational Capitalist Class”.Science and Society 64, 1: 11–54.Google Scholar
  53. Rowthorn, Robert E. and John R. Wells. 1987.De-Industrialization and Foreign Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Schumpeter, Joseph. 1954.Capitalism, Socialism & Democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  55. —. 1961.The Theory of Economic Development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. —. 1964.Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  57. Silver, Beverly J. 2003.Forces of Labor: Workers’ Movements and Globalization since 1870. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, in press.Google Scholar
  58. — 1990. “The Contradictions of Semiperipheral Success: The Case of Israel”. Pp. 161–181 inSemiperipheral States in the World Economy, ed. William G. Martin. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  59. Silver, Beverly J. and Giovanni Arrighi. 2000. “Workers North and South”. Pp. 51–74 inWorking Classes, Global Realities (Socialist Register 2001), eds. Leo Panitch and Colin Leys. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  60. Singer, Hans. 1997. “The Golden Age of the Keynesian Consensus—The Pendulum Swings Back”.World Development 25, 3: 293–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tickner, J. Ann. 1990. “Reaganomics and the Third World: Lessons from the Founding Fathers”.Polity: The Journal of the Northeastern Political Science Association 23, 1: 53–76.Google Scholar
  62. Tipps, Dean C. 1973. “Modernization Theory and the Study of National Societies: A Critical Perspective”.Comparative Studies in Society and History 15, 2: 199–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Toye, John. 1993.Dilemmas of Development. Reflections on the Counter-Revolution in Development Economics. Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  64. Vernon, Raymond. 1971.Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of U.S. Enterprises. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  65. —. 1966. “International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle”.Quarterly Journal of Economics 80, 2: 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. World Bank. 1984.World Tables, vols. 1 & 2. Washington D.C.: World Bank.Google Scholar
  67. —. 2001.World Development Indicators. CD ROM. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Arrighi
  • Beverly J. Silver
  • Benjamin D. Brewer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations