Advertisement

Capitalism without compromise: Strong business and weak labor in Eastern Europe’s new transnational industries

  • Dorothee Bohle
  • Béla Greskovits
Articles

Abstract

This paper contributes to the debate on the social impact of globalization. It focuses on the mediating role of the sectoral pattern of transnational production relocation to the postcommunist economies of Eastern Europe. We argue that the collapse of the socialist heavy industries and the eastward relocation of traditional light industries initially forced the social conditions of the East European countries to converge at the bottom and deepened the gap between the West and the East. Later, the east-ward migration of high-skilled labor and capital-intensive industries and jobs led to decreasing social disparity between the West and some of the former socialist countries. However, convergence appears uncertain, costly, and uneven, and coincides with increasing social disparity within the group of East European new members and candidates of the European Union.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Comparative International Development Industrial Relation Auto Industry High Minimum Wage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Van Apeldoorn, Baastian. 2002.Transnational Capitalism and the Struggle over European Integration. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bohle, Dorothee. 2006. “Neoliberal Hegemony, Transnational Capital and the Terms of EU’s Eastwards Expansion.”Capital and Class 88: 57–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. — and Dóra Husz. 2005. “Whose Europe is it? Interest Group Action in Accession Negotiations: The Cases of Competition Policy and Labor Migration.”Politique Europeenne 15: 8–112.Google Scholar
  4. Borgula, Juraj and Ludovit Cziria. 2003. “Industrial Relations in Automotive Sector.” 〈http://www.eiro.eurofound.eu.int/2003/12/word/sk0308103s.doc〉.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, David R. 1978. “The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis.”The American Political Science Review 72(4): 1243–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crowley, Stephen, and David Ost, eds. 2001.Workers After Workers State: Labor and Politics in Postcommunist Eastern Europe. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  7. EBRD. Various years.EBRD Transition Report. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
  8. EC Commission. Various Years. “Slovakia. Regular Report on Slovakia’s Progress toward Accession. Brussels.” http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/slovakia/#overview〉.Google Scholar
  9. EIROnline. 2002. “Industrial Relations in the EU Members States and Candidate Countries.” 〈www.eiro.eurofund.eu.int〉.Google Scholar
  10. EIROnline. 2003. “Industrial Relations in the Automotive Sector.” 〈http://www.eiro.eurofound.eu.int/2003/12/study/tn0312101s.html〉.Google Scholar
  11. EIROnline. 2005a. “Slovak Republic: Thematic Features—Unskilled Workers.” www.eiro.eurofound.eu.int/2005/02/tfeature/sk0502102t.html〉.Google Scholar
  12. EIROnline. 2005b. “Slovak Republic: Upward Wage Trend in 2004.” 〈www.eurofound.eu.int/print/2005/02/feature/sk0502104f.html〉.Google Scholar
  13. Esping Andersen, Gosta. 1990.The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Estevez-Abe, Margarita, Torben Iversen and David Soskice. 2001. “Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State.” In P.A. Hall and D. Soskice, eds.,Varieties of Capitalism, The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Pp. 145–83. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eyal, Gil, Iván Szelényi and Eleanor Townsley. 1998.Making Capitalism without Capitalists. Class Formation and Elite Struggles in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  16. Ferguson, Thomas. 1984. “From Normalcy to New Deal: Industrial Structure, Party Competition, and American Public Policy in the Great Depression.”International Organization 38(1) (Winter): 41–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Financial Times Deutschland. 13 January 2004. 〈www.ftd.de〉.Google Scholar
  18. Frieden, Jeffry A. 1991. “Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policies in a World of Global Finance.”International Organization 45(4) (Fall): 425–451.Google Scholar
  19. Gourevitch, Peter. 1986.Politics in Hard Times. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Graziani, Giovanni. 1998. “Globalization of Production in the Textile and Clothing Industries: The Case of Italian Foreign Direct Investment and Outward Processing in Eastern Europe.” BRIE Working Paper 128.Google Scholar
  21. Greskovits, Béla. 1997. “Crisis-proof Democracy: On Failed Predictions and the Realities of Eastern Europe’s Transformations.”International Politics 34, (June): 193–211.Google Scholar
  22. —. 1998.The Political Economy of Protest and Patience. East European and Latin American Transformations Compared. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Havas, Attila. 2000. “Changing Patterns of Inter—and Intra-Regional Division of Labour: Central Europe’s Long and Winding Road.” In J. Humphrey, Y. Lecler, and Sergio Salerno, eds.,Global Strategies and Local Realities: The Auto Industry in Emerging Markets. Pp. 234–262. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hirschman, Albert O. 1977. “A Generalized Linkage Approach to Development, with Special Reference to Staples.” InEconomic Development and Cultural Change 25, Supplement (Essays in Honor of Bert Hoselitz). Pp. 67–98. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hospodarske Noviny, 2 February 2005. “UhrÌk: Lacn· Pracovn· Sila Nestačí” (“The Workforce is our strength”).Google Scholar
  26. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985.Small States in World Markets. Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Keohane, Robert A. 1984. “The World Political Economy and the Crisis of Embedded Liberalism.” In John H. Goldthorpe, ed.,Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Studies in the Political Economy of Western European Nations. Pp. 15–38. Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  28. Korpi, Walter 1983.The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge and K. Paul.Google Scholar
  29. Kubicek, Paul. 1999. “Organized Labor in Postcommunist States: Will the Western Sun Set on it, Too?”Comparative Politics. (October): 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kurth, James. 1979. “The Political Consequences of the Product Cycle: Industrial History and Political Outcomes.”International Organization. 33(1) (Winter), 1–34.Google Scholar
  31. Mares, Isabella. 2003. “The Sources of Business Interest in Social Insurance. Sectoral versus National Differences.”World Politics 55 (January): 229–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin, Andrew, and George Ross, eds. 1999.The Brave New World of European Labor. European Trade Unions at the Millenium. New York, Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  33. —, eds. 2004.Euros and the Europeans. Monetary Integration and the European Model of Society. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mikulikova, Marta. 2002. “Preserving or Escaping the German Model of Industrial Relations? The Case of Volkswagen and its Subsidiaries in Central Europe.” Budapest, Central European University, Department of Political Sciences, M.A. Thesis.Google Scholar
  35. Népszabadság online (NOL): 〈www.nepszabadsag.hu〉.Google Scholar
  36. Offe, Claus and Helmut Wiesenthal. 1980. “Two Logics of Collective Action: Theoretical Notes on Social Class and Organizational Form.”Political Power and Social Theory 1: 67–115.Google Scholar
  37. Oman, Charles. 2000.Policy Competition for Foreign Direct Investment. A Study of Competition among Governments to Attract FDI. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  38. Paoli, Pascal and Agnes Parent-Thirion. 2003. “Working Conditions in the Acceding and Candidate Countries.” Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. <www.eurofound.eu.int|url>.Google Scholar
  39. Perzel, Igor. 2005. “Assertive or Submissive: A Comparative Study of the Hungarian and Slovak Governments’ Bargaining Position vis-a-vis the Multinational Corporations of the Automotive Industry.” Budapest, Central European University, Department of International Relations and European Studies, M.A. Thesis.Google Scholar
  40. Radosevic, Slavo, and Deniz Elem Yoruk. 2000. VIDEOTON: “The Growth of Enterprise through Entrepreneurship and Network Alignment.” Prepared within the project “The Emerging Industrial Architecture of the Wider Europe: the Co-evolution of Industrial and Political Structures.” Mimeo.Google Scholar
  41. Ruggie, John G. 1982. “International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.”International Organisation 47 (1): 379–416.Google Scholar
  42. Schulten, Thorsten and Angelika Stueckler. 2000. “Lohnpolitik in Europa. Eine Studie im Auftrag des European Industrial Relations Observatory.” WSI-Informationen zur Tarifpolitik. Düsseldorf, Oktober.Google Scholar
  43. Shafer, Michael D. 1994.Winners and Losers: How Sectors Shape the Developmental Prospects of States. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Silver, Beverly J. 2003.Forces of Labor. Workers’ Movement and Globalization since 1870. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Swenson, Peter 1991. “Bringing Capital Back in, or: Social Democracy Reconsidered: Employer Power, Cross-Class Alliances, and Centralization of Industrial Relations in Denmark and Sweden.”World Politics 43(4): 513–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Tulder, Rob, and Winfried Ruigrok. 1998: “European Cross-National Production Networks in the Auto Industry: Eastern Europe as the Low End of European Car Complex.” BRIE Working Paper 121.Google Scholar
  47. Uhrík, Jozef. 2005. “Vyvij Automobiloveho Premyslu na Slovensku” (“The Development of Automotive Industry in Slovakia”). Presentation at the Sredoeuropske Automobilove Forum, 11 May 2005, Incheba, Bratislava, Slovakia.Google Scholar
  48. Vagac, Lubos. 2000. “Die Automobilindustrie in der Slowakischen Republik.” Manuscript prepared for the Robert Brenner Stiftung.Google Scholar
  49. Vaughan-Whitehead, Daniel. 2003.EU Enlargement versus Social Europe? The Uncertain Future of the European Social Model. Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  50. Visser, Jelle. 2004. “Patterns and Variations in European Industrial Relations.” Paper prepared for the European Commission.Google Scholar
  51. Werner, Robert. 2003. “Location, Cheap Labor and Government Incentives: A Case Study of Automotive Investment in Central Europe since 1989.”Chazen Web Journal of International Business (Spring): 1–29.Google Scholar
  52. Wright, Erik Olin (2000): “Working-Class Power, Capitalist-Class Interests, and Class Compromise.”The American Journal of Sociology 105(4): 957–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. ZAPSR (Automobile Industry Association of the Slovak Republic). 2003. Studia. <www.zapsr.sk/industrylhtm>.Google Scholar
  54. Ziltener, Patrick. 2004. “The Economic Effects of the European Single Market Project: Projections, Simulations, and the Reality.”Review of International Political Economy 11(5): 953–979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorothee Bohle
    • 1
  • Béla Greskovits
    • 1
  1. 1.Central European UniversityBudapest

Personalised recommendations