Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

From Brain Drain to Brain Circulation: Transnational Communities and Regional Upgrading in India and China

Abstract

By 2000, over one-third of Silicon Valley’s high-skilled workers were foreign-born, and overwhelmingly from Asia. These U.S.-educated engineers are transforming developmental opportunities for formerly peripheral regions as they build professional and business connections to their home countries. In a process more akin to “brain circulation” than “brain drain,” these engineers and entrepreneurs, aided by the lowered transaction costs associated with digitization, are transferring technical and institutional know-how between distant regional economies faster and more flexibly than most large corporations. This article examines how Chinese- and Indian-born engineers are accelerating the development of the information technology industries in their home countries—initially by tapping the low-cost skill in their home countries, and over time by contributing to highly localized processes of entrepreneurial experimentation and upgrading, while maintain close ties to the technology and markets in Silicon Valley. However, these successful models also raise several questions about the broader relevance of brain circulation outside of several key countries, and regions of those countries, within the global South.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Basant, Rakesh and Prankaj Chanadra. 2004. “Capability Building and Inter-Organizational Linkages in the Indian IT Industry.” In D'Costa, Anthony and E. Sridharan, eds.India in the Global Software Industry. New Delhi: Macmillian India.

  2. Biswas, Smita. 1998. “Leading the VC Wave in India.”Siliconindia, May/June. http://web.archive.org/ web/19990218061723/www.siliconindia.com/MayJune98wave.html. Access date: Sept. 19, 2004.

  3. Chan, Wai-Chan, Martin Hirt, and Stephen Shaw. 2002. “The Greater China High-Tech Highway.”McKinsey Quarterly 4. Available online: http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/ article_page.aspx?ar=1232&L2=4&L3=43. Access date: Sept. 18, 2004.

  4. Chwang, Ronald. 1997. “Welcome and Opening Remarks,” Monte Jade Science and Technology Association (West). Seventh Annual Conference, Santa Clara, CA, Mar. 15.

  5. Clendenin, Mike. 2003. “Befriending the Dragon.” Electronic Engineering Times, October 31. Available online: http://www.eetimes.com/futureofsemis/. Access Date: Sept. 2, 2004.

  6. Desai, Ashok V. 2003. “The Dynamics of the Indian Information Technology Industry.” Center for New and Emerging Markets, London Business School, Apr. Available online: http:// www.london.edu/cnem/Faculty/S_Commander/india27603.pdf. Access Date: Sept. 6, 2004.

  7. Hobday, Michael. 1995. “East Asian Latecomer Firms: Learning the Technology of Electronics.”World Development 23 (7): 1171–1193.

  8. Kurian, Thomas. 1997. “In the Footsteps of Giants.”Siliconindia. November. Available online: http:/ /web.archive.org/web/19990508224300/www.siliconindia.com/3rdGiants.html Access date: Sept. 19, 2004.

  9. Mahmood, Ishtiaq P., and Jasjit Singh. 2003. “Technological Dynamism in Asia.”Research Policy 32: 1031–1054.

  10. Mathur, Rakesh. 2002. Presentation at Forum on Local And Global Networks of Immigrant Professionals. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.

  11. McKendrick, David G., Richard F. Doner, and Stephan Haggard. 2000.From Silicon Valley to Singapore: Location and Competitive Advantage in the Hard Disk Drive Industry. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  12. Parthasarathy, Balaji. 2000. “Globalization and Agglomeration in Newly Industrializing Countries: The State and the Information Technology Industry in Bangalore, India.” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley, Spring.

  13. Rapaport, Hillel. 2002. “Who is Afraid of the Brain Drain? Human Capital Flight and Growth in Developing Countries.” Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Policy Brief. April.

  14. Rasiah, Rajah. 2001. “Politics, Institutions and Flexibility: Microelectronics Transnationals and Machine Tool Linkages in Malaysia.” In F. C. Deyo, R. F. Doner, and E. Hershberg, eds.,Economic Governance and the Challenge of Flexibility in East Asia. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

  15. Reynolds, Paul D., et al. 2001.Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2000 Executive Report. Babson Park, MA: Babson College.

  16. Santa Clara County Office of Human Relations. 2000. “Building Borders in Silicon Valley: Summit on Immigrant Needs and Contributions.” San Jose, CA: Santa Clara County Office of Human Relations.

  17. Saxenian, AnnaLee. 2003. “Government andGuanxi: The Chinese Software Industry in Transition.” Paper presented at the conference “Global Software from Emerging Markets: An Engine for Growth?” Centre for New and Emerging Markets, London Business School, May 12.

  18. Schram, Art. 2001. “Venture Guru.”Siliconindia. Sept.: 66–68. Available online: http:// www.siliconindia.com/Magazine/fullstory.asp?aid=LCX354848695. Access Date: Sept. 7, 2004.

  19. Shankar, Pradeep, and Karthik Sundaram. 2003. “The cross-border Nadkarni,”Siliconindia, February 2. Available online: http://www.siliconindia.com/person_ftweek/pow.asp?id=133. Access Date: September 23, 2004.

  20. Thurm, Scott. 1998. “High-Tech Firms Big and Small Go Global,”San Jose Mercury News, May 9.

  21. Todaro, Michael P. 1985.Economic Development in the Third World. New York: Longman.

  22. Trajtenberg, Manuel. 2000. “R&D Policy in Israel: An Overview and Reassessment.” NBER Working Paper No. w7930. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. October 2000. Available online: http://papers.nber.org/papers/w7930.pdf. Access Date: Sept. 14, 2004.

  23. White, Steve, Jian Gao, and Wei Zhang. 2002. “China's Venture Capital Industry: Institutional Trajectories and Systems Structure.” Paper prepared for INTECH, International Conference on Financial Systems, Corporate Investment in Innovation and Venture Capital, Brussels, November 7–8.

  24. Wilson, Dominic and Roopa Purushothaman. 2003. “Dreaming with BRICS: The Path to 2050” Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper No. 99. Available online: www.gs.com/insight/research/ reports/99.pdf. Access date: May 31, 2005.

  25. Woetzel, Jonathan R., and Andrew Chun Chen. 2002. “Chinese Chips.”McKinsey Quarterly 2. Available online: http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/article. Access date: Sept 19, 2004.

  26. Xiao, Wei. 2002. “The New Economy and Venture Capital in China.”Perspectives 3(6), Sept. 30. Available online: http://www.oycf.org/Perspectives/18_093002/Economy_Venture_China.htm. Access Date: Sept. 7, 2004.

Download references

Additional information

AnnaLee Saxenian is dean and professor at the School of Information Management and Systems and professor in the Department of City and Regional Planning at the University of California, Berkeley. She is currently exploring how immigrant engineers and scientists are transferring technology entrepreneurship to regions in Asia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saxenian, A. From Brain Drain to Brain Circulation: Transnational Communities and Regional Upgrading in India and China. St Comp Int Dev 40, 35–61 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686293

Download citation

Keywords

  • Home Country
  • Venture Capital
  • Comparative International Development
  • Fund Manager
  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor