Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 1–8 | Cite as

The impact of deregulation on labor demand in class-I railroads

  • Yu Hsing
  • Franklin G. Mixon
Articles

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 on labor demand in Class-I railroads during 1961–1990. The demand for labor is a function of output, hourly wage rates, a time trend, and a vector of interactive dummy variables. Since deregulation, the labor demand curve has shifted downward; wage elasticities have become more elastic, ranging from −0.668 in 1980 to −1.187 in 1990; output elasticities trended upward from 0.557 to 0.809; and the marginal product of labor rose from 3.421 to 5.296 during 1980–1990. These findings suggest that unions’ bargaining power has declined, that the total wage bill is likely to decrease if the real wage rate rises further, and that cost savings and efficiency gains are realized through increases in the marginal product of labor.

Keywords

Wage Rate Marginal Product Labor Demand Output Elasticity Wage Elasticity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, J. “UTU Rank-and-File Endorses Crew Size Reductions on CSX.”Traffic World 26 (December 1988): 25–26.Google Scholar
  2. Barkenov, Christopher C., and Andrew N. Kleit. “The Cost of Railroad Regulation: A Further Analysis.” Bureau of Economics Working Paper no. 164. Washington, D. C.: Federal Trade Commission, 1988.Google Scholar
  3. Boyer, Kenneth D. “The Costs of Price Regulation: Lessons from Railroad Deregulation.”Rand Journal of Economics 18 (Autumn 1987): 408–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Box, George E. P., and David R. Cox. “An Analysis of Transformation.”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (1964): 211–43.Google Scholar
  5. Card, David. “The Impact of Deregulation on the Employment and Wages of Airline Mechanics.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 39 (July 1986): 527–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen, and J. A. Swanson. “Economic Performance in Regulated and Unregulated Environments: A Comparison of U.S. and Canadian Railroads.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 96 (1981): 559–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Demsetz, Harold. “Industry Structure, Market Rivalry, and Public Policy.”Journal of Law and Economics 16 (April 1973): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hamermesh, Daniel S. “Econometric Studies of Labor Demand and Their Application to Policy Analysis.”Journal of Human Resources 11 (Fall 1976): 507–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. _____. “The Demand for Labor in the Long-Run.” In Orley C. Ashenfelter and Richard Layard, eds.Handbook of Labor Economics. Vol. I, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1986, 429–71.Google Scholar
  10. Hendricks, Wallace E. “Regulations and Labor Earnings.”Bell Journal of Economics 8 (Autumn 1977): 483–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsing, Yu. “Testing for the Flexible Employment Elasticity Hypothesis: Application of an Expanded Box-Cox Model to U.S. Manufacturing.”Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 29 (Summer 1989): 96–107.Google Scholar
  12. Kmenta, Jan.Elements of Econometrics. 2nd edition. New York: Macmillan, 1986.Google Scholar
  13. Lee, Tenpao, C. Phillip Baumel, and Patricia Harris. “Market Structure, Conduct, and Performance of the Class-I Railroad Industry, 1971–1984.”Transportation Journal 27 (Summer 1987): 54–66.Google Scholar
  14. Lieb, R. C. “The Changing Nature of Labor/Management Relations in Transportation.”Transportation Journal 23 (Spring 1984): 4–14.Google Scholar
  15. MacDonald, James M. “Railroad Deregulation, Innovation, and Competition: Effects of the Staggers Act on Grain Transportation.”Journal of Law and Economics 32 (April 1989): 63–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McFarland, Henry. “The Effects of United States Railroad Deregulation on Shippers, Labor, and Capital.”Journal of Regulatory Economics 1 (September 1989): 259–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moore, Thomas Gale. “U.S. Airline Deregulation: Its Effects on Passengers, Capital, and Labor.”Journal of Law and Economics 29 (April 1986): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rose, Nancy L. “Labor Rent Sharing and Regulation: Evidence from the Trucking Industry.”Journal of Political Economy 95 (December 1987): 1146–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Task Force on Railroad Productivity.Improving Railroad Productivity. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1973.Google Scholar
  20. Thornton, Robert J. “The Elasticity of Demand for Public School Teachers.”Industrial Relations 18 (Winter 1979): 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Willig, Robert D., and William J. Baumol. “Railroad Deregulation: Using Competition As a Guide.”Regulation 11 (January/February 1987): 28–35.Google Scholar
  22. Wilson, William W., Wesley W. Wilson, and Won W. Koo. “Modal Competition and Pricing in Grain Transport.”Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 22 (September 1988): 319–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Labor Research 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu Hsing
    • 1
  • Franklin G. Mixon
    • 2
  1. 1.Southeastern Louisiana UniversityHammond
  2. 2.University of Southern MississippiHattiesburg

Personalised recommendations