Advertisement

Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 299–316 | Cite as

The effect of immigration on aggregate native unemployment: An across-city estimation

  • Julian L. Simon
  • Stephen Moore
  • Richard Sullivan
Articles

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between the rate of immigration into various cities in various years and the level and change in unemployment. In pooled regressions, immigration lagged one year does not show a statistically significant effect either by itself or when other lags are added. Individual regressions using the difference in unemployment rates over time show a slight, but statistically insignificant, positive displacement effect over two-year periods. The evidence indicates that there is little or no observed increase in aggregate native unemployment due to immigration, even in the relatively short run during which adjustment frictions should be most severe.

Keywords

Labor Force Unemployment Rate Immigration Rate Wage Effect Pool Regression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Engineering Association, Testimony presented to the House Immigration Subcommittee, U.S. Congress, on “Legal Immigration Reform Measures,” April 14, 1989.Google Scholar
  2. Bahral, Uri.The Effect of Mass Immigration on Wages in Israel. Jerusalem: The Falk Project, 1965.Google Scholar
  3. Bartel, Ann P. “Where Do the New Immigrants Live?”Journal of Labor Economics 7 (October 1989): 371–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bean, Frank D., B. Lindsay Lowell, and Lowell J. Taylor. “Undocumented Mexican Immigrants and the Earnings of Other Workers in the United States.” Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, 1986.Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, David E., and Richard B. Freeman. “The Youth Problem:’ Age or Generational Crowding?”Employment Outlook. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1986.Google Scholar
  6. Card, David. “The Impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami Labor Market.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 45 (January 1990): 245–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiswick, Barry R., Carmel U. Chiswick, Paul W. Miller. “Are Immigrants and Natives Perfect Substitutes in Production?”International Migration Review 19 (Winter 1985): 674–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeFreitas, Gregory. “Hispanic Immigration and Labor Market Segmentation.”Industrial Relations 27 (Spring 1988): 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeFreitas, Gregory, and Adriana Marshall. “Immigration and Wage Growth in U.S. Manufacturing in the 1970s.”Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association. Madison, WI: IRRA, 1983, pp. 148–56.Google Scholar
  10. Easterlin, Richard A., David Ward, William S. Bernard, and Reed Ueda.Immigration. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  11. The Environmental Fund,The Data, November 1983, p. 2.Google Scholar
  12. Gallaway, Lowell, Richard Vedder, and Vishwa Shukla. “The Distribution of Immigrant Population in the United States: An Economic Analysis.”Explorations in Economic History 11 (March 1974): 213–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldstein, Harold. “State and Local Labor Force Statistics.” InData Collection, Processing and Presentation: National and Local, National Commission on Unemployment Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1980, pp. 412–65.Google Scholar
  14. Grossman, Jean Baldwin. “The Substitutability of Natives and Immigrants in Production.”Review of Economics and Statistics 64 (November 1982): 596–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hamermesh, Daniel, and James Grant. “Econometric Studies of Labor-Labor Substitution and Their Implications for Policy.”Journal of Human Resources 14 (Fall 1979): 518–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrison, David S. “The Impact of Immigration on a Depressed Labor Market: The South Australian Experience.”Economic Record 60 (March 1984): 57–67.Google Scholar
  17. Hill, Kenneth. “Illegal Aliens: An Assessment.” InImmigration Statistics: A Story of Neglect. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1985, pp. 225–45.Google Scholar
  18. Huddle, Donald L., Arthur F. Corwin, and Gordon J. MacDonald. “Illegal Immigration: Job Displacement and Social Costs.” Monterey, VA: The American Immigration Control Foundation, 1985.Google Scholar
  19. Jerome, Harry.Migration and Business Cycles. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1926.Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, George E. “The Labor Market Effects of Immigration.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 33 (April 1980): 331–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, K., and Smith, A. D.The Economic Impact of Commonwealth Immigration. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  22. Judge, George, W.E. Griffiths, R. Carter Hill, Helmut Lütkepohl, and Tsoung-Chao Lee.The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. New York: Wiley, 1985.Google Scholar
  23. Kuh, Edwin, and John R. Meyer. “Correlation and Regression Estimates When the Data Are Ratios.”Econometrica 23 (1955): 400–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuznets, Simon, and Ernest Rubin.Immigration and the Foreign Born. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1954.Google Scholar
  25. Kuznets, Simon. “Long Swings in the Growth of Population and in Related Economic Variables.”Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 102 (February 1958): 25–52.Google Scholar
  26. _____.Economic Growth of Nations. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  27. LaLonde, Robert J., and Robert H. Topel. “Labor Market Adjustments to Increased Immigration,” Mimeo, University of Chicago, March 1989.Google Scholar
  28. Morgan, Larry C., and Bruce L. Gardner. “Potential for a U.S. Guest-Worker Program in Agriculture: Lessons from the Braceros.” In Barry R. Chiswick, (ed.)The Gateway: U.S. Immigration Issues and Policies. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1982, pp. 361–411.Google Scholar
  29. Muller, Thomas, and Thomas Espenshade.The Fourth Wave: California’s Newest Immigrants. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 1985.Google Scholar
  30. Norwood, Janet L. “Reshaping a Statistical Program to Meet Legislative Priorities.”Monthly Labor Review 100 (November 1977): 6–11.Google Scholar
  31. Plewes, Thomas J. “Treatment of Immigrants in Local and Area Unemployment Statistics.” U.S. Department of Labor, mimeo, September 5, 1980.Google Scholar
  32. Rogers, Tommy W. “Migration Attractiveness of Southern Metropolitan Areas.”Social Science Quarterly 50 (September 1969): 325–36.Google Scholar
  33. Simon, Julian L.The Economic Consequences of Immigration. Boston and Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
  34. Simon, Rita.Public Opinion and the Immigrant. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1985.Google Scholar
  35. Smith, Barton, and Robert Newman. “Depressed Wages Along the U.S.-Mexican Border: An Empirical Analysis.”Economic Inquiry 15 (January 1977): 56–66.Google Scholar
  36. Thomas, Brinley.Migration and Economic Growth: A Study of Great Britain and the Atlantic Economy. London: Cambridge University Press, 1954 and 1973.Google Scholar
  37. Thomas, Dorothy Swaine.Social and Economic Aspects of Swedish Population Movements, 1750–1933. New York: Macmillan, 1941.Google Scholar
  38. U.S. National Commission on Employment and Unemployment Statistics.Counting the Labor Force. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979.Google Scholar
  39. Wetzel, James R., and Martin Ziegler. “Measuring Unemployment in States and Local Areas.”Monthly Labor Review 97 (June 1974): 40–46.Google Scholar
  40. Ziegler, Martin. “Efforts to Improve Estimates of State and Local Unemployment Statistics.”Monthly Labor Review 100 (November 1977): 12–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Labor Research 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julian L. Simon
    • 1
  • Stephen Moore
    • 2
  • Richard Sullivan
    • 3
  1. 1.University of MarylandCollege Park
  2. 2.Cato InstituteWashington, DC
  3. 3.College of the Holy CrossWorcester

Personalised recommendations