The effect of type of union on member-nonmember wage differentials
- 23 Downloads
The union-nonunion wage differential can be decomposed into bargaining and membership effects. While some analysts suggest that they are not separable and that bargaining power is a function of membership density, others argue that they are separable and that the former derives from monopoly power while the latter stems from socialization. Our results support the latter view. We derive estimates of bargaining and membership effects for workers covered by national, industrial, and craft union contracts as well as for all covered workers taken together. Since industrial and craft unions differ in structure and organization, we expect differences in the socialization effects among types of unions. It is clear from our results that union membership per se in each case gives a large positive wage advantage.
KeywordsCollective Bargaining Union Member Union Membership Monopoly Power Labor Relation Review
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blakemore, Arthur E., Janet C. Hunt, and B. F. Kiker. “Collective Bargaining and Union Membership Effects on the Wages of Male Youths.” Arizona State University Faculty Working Papers, EC 83/84-27.Google Scholar
- _____. “The Two Faces of Unionism.”Public Interest (Fall 1979): 69–93.Google Scholar
- _____. “The Impact of Collective Bargaining: Illusion or Reality?” NBER Working Paper. March 1981.Google Scholar
- _____.What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. “Some Comments on the Significance of Labor Unions for Economic Policy,” from D. McCord Wright,The Impact of the Union. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co., 1951.Google Scholar
- Lindblom, Charles E.Unions and Capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
- Perlman, Mark.Labor Union Theories in America. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson and Co., 1958.Google Scholar