Advertisement

Journal of Labor Research

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 59–65 | Cite as

The effect of type of union on member-nonmember wage differentials

  • Janet C. Hunt
  • B. F. Kiker
  • C. Glyn Williams
Articles

Abstract

The union-nonunion wage differential can be decomposed into bargaining and membership effects. While some analysts suggest that they are not separable and that bargaining power is a function of membership density, others argue that they are separable and that the former derives from monopoly power while the latter stems from socialization. Our results support the latter view. We derive estimates of bargaining and membership effects for workers covered by national, industrial, and craft union contracts as well as for all covered workers taken together. Since industrial and craft unions differ in structure and organization, we expect differences in the socialization effects among types of unions. It is clear from our results that union membership per se in each case gives a large positive wage advantage.

Keywords

Collective Bargaining Union Member Union Membership Monopoly Power Labor Relation Review 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blakemore, Arthur E., Janet C. Hunt, and B. F. Kiker. “Collective Bargaining and Union Membership Effects on the Wages of Male Youths.” Arizona State University Faculty Working Papers, EC 83/84-27.Google Scholar
  2. Christensen, S. and D. Maki. “The Wage Effect of Compulsory Union Membership.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 36 (January 1983): 230–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Freeman, Richard B., and James L. Medoff. “New Estimates of Private Sector Unionism in the United States.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 32 (January 1979): 143–74. (a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. _____. “The Two Faces of Unionism.”Public Interest (Fall 1979): 69–93.Google Scholar
  5. _____. “The Impact of Collective Bargaining: Illusion or Reality?” NBER Working Paper. March 1981.Google Scholar
  6. _____.What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books, 1984.Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, M. “Some Comments on the Significance of Labor Unions for Economic Policy,” from D. McCord Wright,The Impact of the Union. New York: Harcourt Brace and Co., 1951.Google Scholar
  8. Jones, Ethel B., “Union/Nonunion Differentials: Membership or Coverage?”Journal of Human Resources 17 (Spring 1982): 276–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lindblom, Charles E.Unions and Capitalism. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  10. Perlman, Mark.Labor Union Theories in America. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson and Co., 1958.Google Scholar
  11. Simons, Henry C. “Some Reflections on Syndicalism.”Journal of Political Economy 52 (March 1944): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Labor Research 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet C. Hunt
    • 1
  • B. F. Kiker
    • 2
  • C. Glyn Williams
    • 2
  1. 1.University of GeorgiaAthens
  2. 2.University of South CarolinaColumbia

Personalised recommendations