Current Psychological Reviews

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 269–281

Physical appearance and criminality

  • Ray Bull
Article

Abstract

Throughout the history of psychology the controversial belief in a relationship between physical appearance and criminality has reared its ugly head! Though modern criminologists do not believe that criminals belong to a single physical type, it is possible that the general public, the police, juries, and so forth, may believe in such relationships and act accordingly. The present paper describes some investigations of the extent to which the general public and the police believe that ‘the face fits the crime’. Studies of the facial appearance of prison inmates are reviewed, as is research on the effects of plastic surgery on prison recidivism rates. The relationship between children’s physical appearance and behavioural abnormalities is discussed, as is the literature on the way that we react to children as a function of their facial appearance. Studies concerning society’s reactions to facial disfigurement are presented to show that there may be some support for Cavior, Hayes and Cavior’s (1975) view that ‘low physical attractiveness contributes to careers of deviancy’.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. British Medical Journal (1965). Physical disability and crime. 1, 1448–1449.Google Scholar
  2. Bull, R. & Clifford, B. (1979). Eyewitness memory. In M.M. Gruneberg & P.E. Norris (eds.), Applied Problems in Memory. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bull, R. & Green, J. (1980). The relationship between physical appearance and criminality. Medicine, Science and Law, 20, 79–83.Google Scholar
  4. Bull, R. & Stevens, J. (1981). The effects of facial deformity on helping behaviour. Italian Journal of Psychology, 8, 25–33.Google Scholar
  5. Cavior, H., Hayes, S. & Cavior, N. (1975). Physical attractiveness of female offenders. In A. Brodsky (ed.), The Female Offender. London: Saga.Google Scholar
  6. Dion, K. (1972). Physical attractiveness of children’s transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 207–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kozeny, E. (1962). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Ausdruckskundemittel photographisch-statisticher Methode. Archiv für die Gesante Psychologie, 114, 55–71.Google Scholar
  8. Kurtzberg, R., Safar, H. & Cavior, N. (1968). Surgical and social rehabilitation of adult offenders. Proceedings of the 76th Annual Convention of The American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  9. Kurtzberg, R., Lewin, M., Cavior, N. & Lipton, D. (1967). Psychologic screening of inmates requesting cosmetic operations: a preliminary report. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 39, 387–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lewison, E. (1974). Twenty years of prison surgery: an evaluation. Canadian Journal of Otolaryngology, 3, 42–50.Google Scholar
  11. Liggett, J. (1974). The Human Face. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  12. Lombroso, C. (1911). Crime, its Causes and Remedies. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  13. Longacre, J. (1973). Rehabilitation of the Facially Disfigured. Springfield: Thomas.Google Scholar
  14. Lowenstein, L. (1978). The bullied and non-bullied child. Bulletin of The British Psychological Society, 31, 316–318.Google Scholar
  15. Masters, F. & Greaves, D. (1967). The Quasimodo complex. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 20, 204–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meyer, J., Hoopes, J., Jabaley, M. & Allen, R. (1973). Is plastic surgery effective in the rehabilitation of deformed delinquent adolescents? Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 51, 53–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pick, J. (1948). Ten years of plastic surgery in a penal institution: preliminary report. Journal of the International College of Surgeons, 11, 315–319.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Rich, J. (1975). Effects of children’s physical attractiveness on teachers’ evaluations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robinson, J. (1978). Catching Criminals, Some Basic Skills. London: Police Review Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Rumsey, N., Bull, R. & Gahagan, D. (1982). The effects of facial disfigurement on the proxemic behaviour of the general public. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schuring, A. & Dodge, R. (1967). The role of cosmetic surgery in criminal rehabilitation. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 40, 268–270.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Spira, M., Chizen, J., Gerow, F. & Hardy, S. (1966). Plastic surgery in the Texas prison system. British Journal of Plastic Surgery, 19, 364–371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Straith, C. & De Kleine, E. (1938). Plastic surgery in children: the medical and psychologic aspects of deformity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 111, 2364–2370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thornton, G. (1939). The ability to judge crimes from photographs of criminals. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 34, 378–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Waldrop, M. & Halverson, C. (1971). Minor physical anomalies and hyperactive behaviour in young children. In J. Hellmuth (ed.), The Exceptional Infant: Studies in Abnormalities. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Praeger Publishers 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ray Bull
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorth East London PolytechnicLondonUK

Personalised recommendations