Advertisement

Plant Molecular Biology Reporter

, Volume 1, Issue 2, pp 67–76 | Cite as

Experimental approaches to the study of somaclonal variation

  • Thomas J. Orton
Review

Summary

As pointed out in the introduction, the process of cell division in higher eukaryotes appears to be naturally error-prone. It has been argued that differences in overt manifestations of somaclonal variation, which emanate from such errors, are a function of intrinsic selective forces, possibly in combination with altered mistake rates (Orton, 1983). For example, a broader range of variant cells would be expected to remain viable in the context of a suspension culture as compared to a highly differentiated plant structure. In addition, there is a strong suggestion that somaclonal variation is mediated or conditioned at least in part by genotype. Other factors that bear on somaclonal variation, such as age, transfer technique, and medium composition, are probably manifestations of selection (or possibly mutagenic activity as in the case of 2,4-D). More research incorporating improved designs and utilizing new techniques to visualize variability will be needed to elucidate the precise roles that selection and mutation play in the generation of genetic variability in somatic tissues. This knowledge should provide a basis for the design of propagation protocols to minimize or directionally maximize its expression.

Keywords

Somaclonal Variation Culture Plant Cell Somatic Tissue Allele Expression Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnison, P.G. and W.G. Boll (1975). Isoenzymes in cell cultures of bush bean (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Contender): Isoenzymatic differences between stock suspension cultures derived from a single seedling. Can. J. Bot. 53: 261–271.Google Scholar
  2. Ashmore, S.E. and A.R. Gould (1981). Karyotype evolution in a tumour-derived plant tissues culture analyzed by Giemsa C-banding. Protoplasma 106: 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayliss, M.W. (1980). Chromosomal variation in plant tissues in culture. Int. Rev. Cytol. 11A: 113–143.Google Scholar
  4. Boeshore, M., I. Lifshitz, M.R. Hanson, and S. Izhara, in press. Novel composition of mitochondrial genomes inPetunia somatic hybrids derived from cytoplasmic male sterile and fertile plants. Molec. Gen. Genet.Google Scholar
  5. Browers, M.A. and T.J. Orton (1982). A factorial study of chromosomal variability in callus cultures of celery (Apium graveolens L.). Plant Sci. L. 26: 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaleff, R.S. (1981).Genetics of Higher Plants—Applications of Cell Culture. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 24–40.Google Scholar
  7. D'Amato, F. (1952). Polyploidy in the differentiation and function of tissues and cells in plants. A critical examination of the literature. Caryologia 4: 311–358.Google Scholar
  8. D'Amato, F. (1975). The problem of genetic stability in plant tissue and cell cultures. In: O. Frankel and J.G. Hawkes (eds.),Crop Resources for Today and Tomorrow, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 333–348.Google Scholar
  9. De Paepe, R., D. Prat, and T. Huguet (1982). Heritable nuclear DNA changes in doubled haploid plants obtained by pollen culture ofNicotiana sylvestris. Plant Sci. L. 28: 11–28.Google Scholar
  10. Freeling, M. (1975). Further studies on the balance betweenAdh-1 andAdh-2 in maize: gene competitive programs. Genetics 81: 641–654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Greilhuber, J. (1977). Why plant chromosomes do not show G-bands. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 50: 121–124.Google Scholar
  12. Heinz, D.J., G.M.P. Mee, and L.G. Nickell (1969). Chromosome numbers of someSaccharum species hybrids and their cell suspension cultures. Am. J. Bot. 56: 450–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kao, K.N., R.A. Miller, O.L. Gamborg, and B.L. Harvey (1970). Variations in chromosome number and structure in plant cells grown in suspension cultures. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 12: 297–301.Google Scholar
  14. Kao, F.T., J.A. Hartz, M.L. Law, and J.N. Davidson (1982). Isolation and chromosomal localization of unique DNA sequences from a human genomic library. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79: 865–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larkin, P.J. and W.R. Scowcroft (1981). Somaclonal variation: A novel source of genetic variability from cell cultures for improvement. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 60: 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCoy, T.J., R.L. Phillips, and H.W. Rines (1982). Cytogenetic analysis of plants regenerated from oat (Avena satira) tissue cultures, high frequency of partial chromosome loss. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 24: 37–50.Google Scholar
  17. Murashige, T. and R. Nakano (1966). Tissue culture as a potential tool in obtaining polyploid plants. J. Hered. 57: 115–118.Google Scholar
  18. Murata, M. and T.J. Orton (1983). Chromosome structural changes in cultured celery cells. In Vitro (in press).Google Scholar
  19. Ogihara, Y. (1981). Tissue culture inHaworthia. Part 4: Genetic characterization of plants regenerated from callus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60: 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ogura, H. (1978). Genetic control of chromosomal chimeras found in a regenerate from tobacco callus. Jap. J. Genet. 53: 77–90.Google Scholar
  21. Orton, T.J. (1980). Chromosomal variability in tissue cultures and regenerated plants ofHordeum. Theoret. Appl. Genet. 56: 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Orton, T.J. (1983). Genetic variation in somatic tissue—method or madness? Adv. Plant Pathol. (in press).Google Scholar
  23. Osterman, J.C. and D. Swartz (1981). Analysis of a controlling-element mutation at theAdh locus of maize. Genetics 99: 267–273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Peacock, W.J. (1983). Gene transfer in agricultural plants. In:Advances in Gene Technology: Molecular Genetics of Plants and Animals, F. Ahmond, K. Downey, J. Schultz, and R. W. Voellmy (eds.), Univ. of Miami, in press.Google Scholar
  25. Pring, D.R., M.F. Conde, and B.G. Gengenbach (1981). Cytoplasmic genome variability in tissue culture—derived plants. Env. Exptl. Bot. 21: 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rivin, C.J., E.A. Zimmer, C.A. Cullis, V. Walbot, T. Huynh, and R.W. Davis (1983). Evaluation of genomic variability at the nucleic acid level. Plant Molec. Biol. Rep. 1: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sacristan, M.D. and G. Melchers (1969). The caryological analysis of plants regenerated from tumorous and other callus cultures of tobacco. Molec. Gen. Genet. 105:317–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sinnot, E.W. and L.C. Dunn (1939).Principles of Genetics, McGraw-Hill, New York and London, pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
  29. Sunderland, N. (1977). Nuclear cytology. In:Plant Cell and Tissue Culture, vol. 2, H.E. Street (ed.), Berkeley, Univ. of Calif. Press, pp. 177–206.Google Scholar
  30. Young, B.D., M.A. Ferguson-Smith, R.S. Sillan, and E. Boyd (1981). High resolution analysis of human peripheral lymphocyte chromosomes by flow cytometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78: 7727–7731.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Plant Molecular Biology Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., Publishers 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas J. Orton
    • 1
  1. 1.Applied Genetics LabAgrigenetics CorporationBoulder

Personalised recommendations