Ichthyological Research

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 89–94 | Cite as

Depth-related differences in territory size and defense in the herbivorous cichlid,neolamprologus moorii, in lake tanganyika

  • Kenji Karino


Neolamprologus moorii, a small herbivorous cichlid of Lake Tanganyika, defends its territory against food competitors. Territory size and territorial defense were compared between two sites at different depths. In the shallow site, more fishes intruded into the territories than in the deep site, owing to the higher density fish population in the former. The territory holders in the shallow site attacked intruders more often, although the ratio of attacks to number of intruders was similar to that of the deep site. The territories in the deep site were larger and contained a greater amount of algae than the shallow site. The larger territory size in the deep site may have resulted from the lower cost of territory defense due to the lower competitor density and from the need to maintain a greater amount of food resources to compensate for lower algal productivity.

Key words

Territory defense territory size food resources food competitor cichlid 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Brichard, P. 1989. Cichlids and all the other fishes of Lake Tanganyika. T. F. H. Publications, Hong Kong, 544 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Clifton, K. E. 1991. Subordinate group members act as food-finders within striped parrotfish territories. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 145: 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ito, Y., N. Yamamura and M. Shimada. 1992. Animal ecology. Soju Shobo, Tokyo, 507 pp. (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  4. Hixon, M. A. 1980. Food production and competitor density as the determinants of feeding territory size. Am. Nat., 115: 510–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Karino, K. 1995. Male-male competition and female mate choice through courtship display in the territorial damselfishStegastes nigricans. Ethology, 100: 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Karino, K. 1997. Influence of brood size and offspring size on parental investment in a biparental cichlid fish,Neolamprologus moorii. J. Ethol., 15: 39–43.Google Scholar
  7. Kohda, M. 1991. Intra-and interspecific social organization among three herbivorous cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyika. Japan. J. Ichthyol., 38: 147–163.Google Scholar
  8. Kohda, M. 1997. Interspecific society among herbivorous cichlid fishes. Pages 105–120in H. Kawanabe, M. Hori and M. Nagoshi, eds. Fish communities in Lake Tanganyika, Kyoto University Press, Kyoto.Google Scholar
  9. Kohda, M. and Y. Takemon. 1996. Group foraging by the herbivorous cichlid fish,Petrochromis fasciolatus, in Lake Tanganyika. Ichthyol. Res., 43: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kohda, M. and Y. Yanagisawa. 1992. Vertical distributions of two herbivorous cichlid fishes of the genusTropheus in Lake Tanganyika. Africa. Ecol. Fresh. Fish, 1: 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krebs, J. R. and N. B. Davies. 1993. An introduction to behavioural ecology, 3rd ed. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 420 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Kuwamura, T. 1987. Distribution of fishes in relation to the depth and substrate at Myako, east-middle coast of Lake Tanganyika. Afr. Stud. Monogr., 7: 1–14.Google Scholar
  13. Kuwamura, T. 1992. Overlapping territories ofPseudosimochromis curvifrons males and other herbivorous cichlid fishes in Lake Tanganyika. Ecol. Res., 7: 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuwamura, T. and K. Karino. 1991. Vertical distribution of fishes on the rocky shore of Kasenga, southern Lake Tanganyika. Ecol. Limnol. Lake Tanganyika, 7: 18–20.Google Scholar
  15. Russ, G. R. 1987. Is rate of removal of algae by grazers reduced inside territories of tropical damselfishes? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 110: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schoener, T. W. 1970. Non-synchronous spatial overlap of lizards in patchy habitats. Ecology, 51: 408–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Takamura, K. 1984. Interspecific relationships of Aufwuchs-eating fishes in Lake Tanganyika. Env. Biol. Fish., 10: 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Takamura, K. 1988. The first measurement of the primary production of epilithic algae in Lake Tanganyika. Physiol. Ecol. Japan, 25: 1–7.Google Scholar
  19. Warner, R. R. 1991. The use of phenotypic plasticity in coral reef fishes as tests of theory in evolutionary ecology. Pages 387–398in P. F. Sale, ed. The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  20. Whittaker, R. H. and C. W. Fairbanks. 1958. A study of plankton copepod communities in the Columbia Basin, southern Washington. Ecology, 39: 46–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wootton, R. J. 1990. Ecology of teleost fishes. Chapman and Hall, London. 404 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ichthyological Society of Japan 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenji Karino
    • 1
  1. 1.Sesoko Station, Tropical Biosphere Research CenterUniversity of the RyukyusOkinawaJapan

Personalised recommendations