Ichthyological Research

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 121–133

A review of the gobioid fish genusgobioides

  • Edward O. Murdy


The gobioid genusGobioides Lacepède, 1800 shares with the amblyopine gobies (Gobiidae: Amblyopinae) an eel-like, elongate body with a continuous dorsal fin and an affinity for shallow water, muddy bottom habitats. Due to similarities in external morphology and habitat requirements, some workers consideredGobioides allied with amblyopine gobies. Others, however, dispute a close relationship betweenGobioides and the Amblyopinae; morphological and ecological similarities are considered to be homoplasious. Results of this study concur with placingGobioides separate from amblyopine gobies and within the gobiid subfamily Gobionellinae.Gobioides is easily distinguished from the Amblyopinae by its larger eyes (small inGobioides vs. inconspicuous in the Amblyopinae), fewer dorsal and anal-fin rays (14–20 vs. 27–48), and different fin element to vertebra ratios (1∶1 vs. 2∶1).Gobioides reaches lengths of 500 mm SL or greater whereas amblyopines rarely exceed 300 mm SL.Gobioides comprises five species (G. africanus, G. broussoneti, G. grahamae, G. peruanus, andG. sagitta). Although these gobies occupy habitats with similar conditions,Gobioides and amblyopines are nowhere sympatric.Gobioides occurs in tropical and subtropical coastal waters of the eastern and western Atlantic as well as the tropical eastern Pacific Ocean. In the eastern Atlantic.Gobioides is known from Senegal to Zaire. In the western Atlantic.Gobioides is reported from South Carolina to southern Brazil. In the eastern Pacific,Gobioides is known from Mexico to Peru.

Key words

Gobioides vertebral counts species distribution relationships 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Allen, G. R. and D. R. Robertson. 1994. Fishes of the tropical eastern Pacific. University of Hawaii Press. Honolulu. 332 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Bauchot, M. L., M. Desoutter, D. F. Hoese and H. K. Larson. 1991. Catalogue critique des types de Poissons du Museum national d'Histoire naturelle. Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., Paris, 4e ser. 13, section A, 1–2, supplement: 1–82.Google Scholar
  3. Bean, T. H. and B. A. Bean. 1894. Description ofGobioides broussoneti, a fish new to North America, from the Gulf of Mexico. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus., 17: 631–632.Google Scholar
  4. Birdsong, R. S., E. O. Murdy and F. L. Pezold. 1988. A study of the vertebral column and median fin osteology in gobioid fishes with comments on gobioid relationships. Bull. Mar. Sci., 42: 174–214.Google Scholar
  5. Bleeker, P. 1874. Esquisse d'un systéme naturel desGobioides. Arch. Neerl. Sci. Nat., 9: 289–331.Google Scholar
  6. Bloch M. E. and J. G. Schneider. 1801. M. E. Blochii, Systema Ichthyologiae iconibus cx illustratum. Post obitum auctoris opus inchoatum absolvit, correxit, interpolavit Jo. Gottlob Schneider, Saxo. Berolini. Sumtibus Austoris Impressum et Bibliopolio Sanderiano Commissum. 584 pp., 110 pls.Google Scholar
  7. Boulenger, G. A. 1909. Descriptions of three new fishes from Portuguese Guinea. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 8, 4: 429–431.Google Scholar
  8. Cajiga, S. R. R. 1993. Macrofauna de la Laguna Barra de Navidad, Jalisco. Pages 499–508in S. I Salazar-Vallejo and N. E. Gonzalez, eds. Biodiversidad Marina y Costera de México. Com. Nal. Biodiversidad y CIQRO, México, 865 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, H. W. 1936. New and noteworthy fishes. The Templeton Crocker Expedition of the California Academy of Sciences, 1932. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. ser. 4, 21: 383–396.Google Scholar
  10. Dawson, C. E. 1969. Studies on the gobies of Mississippi Sound and adjacent Waters II. An illustrated key to the gobioid fishes. Publications of the Gulf Coast Research Laboratory Museum I. 60 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Evermann, B. W. and L. Radcliffe. 1917. The fishes of the west coast of Peru and the Titicaca basin. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., (95): i-xi+1–166, pls. 1–14.Google Scholar
  12. Giltay, L. 1935. Note sur quelques poissons marins du Congo Belge. Bull. Mus. R. Hist. Nat. Belg., 11, 36: 1–15.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, J. E. 1854. Catalogue of fish collected and described by Laurence Theodore Gronow, now in the British Museum. London. I-vii+196 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Günther, A. C. L. G. 1861. Catalogue of the acanthopterygian fishes in the collection of the British Museum. III. xxv+586+x. ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Günther, A. C. L. G. 1862. Descriptions of new species of reptiles and fishes in the collection of the British Museum. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pt. 2: 188–194, pls. 25–27.Google Scholar
  16. Günther, A. C. L. G. 1864. Report of a collection of fishes made by Messrs. Dow, Godman, and Salvin in Guatemala. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, pt. 1: 144–151.Google Scholar
  17. Harrison, I. J. 1989. Specialization of the gobioid palatopterygoquadrate complex and its relevance to gobioid systematics. J. Nat. Hist., 23: 325–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison, I. J. and P. J. Miller, 1992. Gobiidae. Pages 798–821in C. Lévêque, D. Paugy and G. Teugels. Faune des poissons d'eaux douces et saumâtres d'Afrique de l'Ouest, Tome 2. Musée Royal de l'Afrique Centrale. Tervuren, Belgique.Google Scholar
  19. Hildebrand, S. F. 1946. A descriptive catalog of the shore fishes of Peru. Bull. U.S. Natl. Mus., 189: i-xi+1–530.Google Scholar
  20. Hoese, D. F. 1984. Gobioidei: Relationships. Pages 588–591in H. G. Moser, W. J. Richards, D. M. Cohen, M. P. Fahay, A. W. Kendall, Jr. and S. L. Richardson, eds. Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. Am. Soc. Ichthyol. Herpetol. Spec. Publ. I.Google Scholar
  21. Hora, S. L. 1924. Notes on fishes in the Indian Museum. VI. On a new genus of gobioid fishes (subfamily Trypaucheninae) with notes on related forms. Rec. Indian Mus., 26 (pt 2): 155–164.Google Scholar
  22. Jordan, D. S. 1923 A classification of fishes including families and genera as far as known. Stanford Univ. Publ. Biol. Sci., 3: 77–243.Google Scholar
  23. Jordan, D. S. and C. H. Eigenmann. 1887. A review of the Gobiidae of North America. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus., 9: 477–518.Google Scholar
  24. Koumans, F. P. 1931. Preliminary revision of the genera of the gobioid fishes with united ventral fins. Proefschrift, Lisee, 174 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Lacepède, B. G. E. 1800. Histoire naturelle des poissons. v., 2:i–lxiv+1–632, pl. 1–20.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina Biological survey. x+854 pp.Google Scholar
  27. Maugé, A. L. 1986. Gobiidae. Pages 358–388in J. Daget et al., eds. Check-list of the freshwater fishes of Africa. Catalogue des Poissons d'eau douce d'Afrique. ISNB, MRAC, ORSTOM. Vol. 2.Google Scholar
  28. Menezes, N. A. and J. L. Figueiredo. 1985. Manual de Peixes Marinhos do Sudeste do Brasil. V-Teleostei (4). Museu de Zoologica. Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. 105 pp.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, P. J. 1973. The osteology and adaptive features ofRhyacichthys aspro (Teleostei: Gobioidei) and the classification of gobioid fishes. J. Zool., London, 171: 397–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nelson, J. S. 1984. Fishes of the world. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York xv+523 pp.Google Scholar
  31. Nelson, J. S. 1994. Fishes of the world. 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, xvii+600 pp.Google Scholar
  32. Norman, J. R. 1966. A draft synopsis of the orders, families and genera of recent fishes and fish-like vertebrates. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.), London, 649 pp.Google Scholar
  33. O'Shaughnessy, A. W. E., 1875. Descriptions of new species of Gobiidae in the collection of the British Museum. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 4, 15: 144–148.Google Scholar
  34. Palmer, G. 1952. Notes on the fishes of the genusGobioides, with description of a new species. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 12, 5: 50–57.Google Scholar
  35. Palmer, G. and A. Wheeler. 1955. Further notes on the fishes of the genusGobioides. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., ser. 12, 8: 67–68.Google Scholar
  36. Pezold, F. 1993. Evidence for a monophyletic Gobiinae. Copeia, 1993: 634–643.Google Scholar
  37. Poey, F. 1860. Memorias sobra la historia natural de la Isla de Cuba, acompañadas de sumarios latinos y extractors en Francés. 2: 97–336.Google Scholar
  38. Puyo, J. 1957. Deux nouveaux poissons du Sènégal. Bulletin de la Societe d'Histoire naturelle de Toulouse, 57: 182–188.Google Scholar
  39. Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la nature, ou tableau de l'univers et des corps organisés. Palerme: 1–224. (Fishes on pp. 79–94.)Google Scholar
  40. Robins, C. R., R. M. Bailey, C. E. Bond, J. R. Brooker, E. A. Lachner, R. N. Lea and W. B. Scott. 1980. Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. Am. Fish. Soc., Spec. Publ. 12. 174 pp.Google Scholar
  41. Sauvage, H. E. 1880. Description desGobioides nouveaux ou peu connus de la collection du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle. Bulletin de la Société Philomathique de Paris (Ser. 7) v. 4: 40–58.Google Scholar
  42. Steindachner, F. 1880. Fisch-Fauna des Cauca & Flüsse bei Guayaquil. Denksehr. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 42: 60–103.Google Scholar
  43. Swainson, W. 1839. Natural history and classification of fishes. Amphibians, and Reptiles. Volume II. Longman, Orme, Brown, Green, & Longmans and John Taylor, London, 452 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Weber, M. 1913. Die Fische der Siboga-Expedition, E. J. Brill, Leiden, xiii+710 pp., 1–12 pls.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ichthyological Society of Japan 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward O. Murdy
    • 1
  1. 1.National Science Foundation, Tokyo Regional OfficeAmerican EmbassyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations