Liquid water fade margin requirements for infrared and millimeter wave runway imaging sensors in fog

  • Robert E. Marshall
  • David A. de Wolf
  • Christos Kontogeorgakis
Article
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Liquid water content and particle size distribution at each ten meters in the vertical for a deep advection fog and a shallow radiation fog are analyzed to determine the liquid water loss at millimeter and infrared wavelengths. The liquid water fade margin is calculated along a three degree glideslope in each fog from the current height above the runway to the touchdown point. Millimeter wave fade margin requirements are calculated from the vertical distribution of bulk liquid water content and infrared fade margin requirements are predicted from the vertical distribution of dropsize. Fog dropsize distributions for both fog layers are well fitted to a gamma distribution with a median drop diameter of approximately 9 microns. Millimeter wave imaging sensors operating in a shallow radiation fog are shown to require less than 1 dB of one-way liquid water fade margin. In the deep advection fog, one-way liquid water fade margin requirements at 8.6 mm, 6.8 mm, and 3.2 mm are predicted to be 1, 2, and 6.7 dB respectively. In comparison, the one-way liquid water fade margin requirements at near, middle, and far infrared wavelengths are two orders of magnitude greater than at millimeter wavelengths and indicate the fog layers are opaque to infrared imaging sensors even near the touchdown point. The specific attenuations predicted in the two fogs are consistent with previously reported values.

Keywords

Liquid Water Liquid Water Content Infrared Wavelength Drop Size Distribution Specific Attenuation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

5. References

  1. [1]
    Burgess, M. A. et al, “Synthetic Vision Technology Demonstration” Final Report DOT/FAA/RD-93/40,1, Synthetic Vision Program Office, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D. C., 1993Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Burgess, M. A. and R. D. Hayes, “Synthetic Vision- A View in the Fog”, IEEE 11th Digital Avionics System Conference, Seattle, Washington, October 5–8, 1992.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Wallace, J. M. and P. V. Hobbs,Atmospheric Science, An Introductory Survey, Academic Press, Inc., New York, NY, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Zak, J. A., “Drop Size Distributions and Related Properties of Fog for Five Locations Measured from Aircraft”, NASA Contractor Report 4585, DOT/FAA/CT-94/02, April, 1994.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Doviak, R. J. and D. S. Zrnic,Doppler Radar and Weather Observations, Academic Press, 1984, p32Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Huschke, R. E.,Glossary of Meteorology, American Meteorological Society, 1959, p470Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Battan, L. J.,Radar Observation of the Atmosphere, The University of Chicago Press, 1973, p68Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ippolito, L. J., R. D. Kaul, and R. G. Wallace, “Propagation Effects Handbook for Satellite Systems Design”, NASA Reference Publication 1082, December, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    CCIR,Propagation in Non-Ionized Media, Vol. V, XIV Plenary Assembly, Kyoto, Japan, 1978.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Bohren C.F. and D. R. Huffman,Absorption and Scattering of Light Particles, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Ray P.,Broadband Complex Refractive Indices of Ice and Water, Appl. Optics11, pp. 1836–1844, 1972.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Harris, D., “The Attenuation of Electromagnetic Waves Due to Atmospheric Fog”, International Journal of Infrared and Millimeter Waves, Vol. 16, No. 6, 1995, pp. 1091–1108CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. Marshall
    • 1
  • David A. de Wolf
    • 2
  • Christos Kontogeorgakis
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Triangle InstituteOne Enterprise ParkwayHampton
  2. 2.Bradley Department of Electrical EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityAustria

Personalised recommendations