Advertisement

One witch, two dogs, and a game of ninepins: Cervantes' use of renaissance dialectic in thecoloquio de los perros

  • Arthur F. Kinney
Article
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

The best and best-known of Cervantes'Exemplary Novels, The Colloquy of Dogs, is also the most difficult yet most rewarding. Exploiting a humanist poetics grounded in the classical tradition of rhetorical dialectic and colloquy and imitating Erasmus'sPraise of Folly, Cervantes makes human nature and the human use of reason problematic by raising questions and paradoxes about them. In such a work, built through many layers of narration and dialogue, the meaning finally rests with the reader (as, mutatis mutandis, in the dialogues of Plato) whose job it is to determine reading and so at last stabilize the text. In this way,The Colloquy of Dogs not only teaches the reader but puts the lessons of the colloquy to an immediate test and into immediate action.

Keywords

Classical Tradition Ella Billiard Table Humanist Belief Paradoxical Preface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Miguel de Cervantes,Novelas Ejemplares, Vol. I, with an Introduction by Margarita, Smerdou Altolaquirre (Madrid: Novelas y Cuentos, 1973): “Prólogo,” pp. 25–28; “El casamiento engañoso,” pp. 125–146; “El coloquio de los perros,” pp. 147–232. The translation used here is that of C. A. Jones in the Penguin Classics series (London: Penguin, 1972). The two parts of theQuijote were published in 1605 and 1615.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sir Philip Sidney, “A Defence of Poetry,” in:Miscellaneous Prose of Sir Philip, Sidney, ed. Katherine Duncan-Jones and Jan van Dorsten (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973), p. 100. Cf. Aristotle,Rhetoric I 1,1355 b 1–2; and Cicero,De Inventione I.4.5;De oratore I.8.31–34.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. C. Riley,Cervantes's Theory of the Novel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962), p. 195.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    “Prologue” trans. Francisco J. Borges (2).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arthur F. Kinney,Continental Humanist Poetics: Studies in Erasmus, Castiglione, Marguerite de Navarre, Rabelais, and Cervantes (Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press, 1989), p. 24.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Victoria Kahn,Rhetoric, Prudence, and Skepticism in the Renaissance (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1985), p. 22.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jonathan Culler, “Prolegomena to a Theory of Reading,” in:The Reader in the Text, ed. Susan R. Suleiman and Inge Crosman (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1980), p. 65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Transaction Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur F. Kinney
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishUniversity of Massachusetts at AmherstAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations