Therapeutic climate of sexual offender treatment programs

  • Anthony Beech
  • Ann Scott Fordham
Research and Clinical Articles

Abstract

A measure of group atmosphere, the Group Environment Scale (GES), was administered to members and leaders of 12 sexual offender treatment groups: 8 were probation programs; 4 were conducted at a long-term residential center. The GES measured the following aspects of group processes: relationships within the group, personal growth of members, and structure of the group. Results suggested that the atmosphere of a group had an important influence on treatment change. A successful group was highly cohesive, was well organized and led, encouraged the open expression of feelings, produced a sense of group responsibility, and instilled a sense of hope in its members. A helpful and supportive leadership style was found to be important in creating an atmosphere in which effective therapy could take place. Overcontrolling leaders were seen to have a detrimental effect upon group climate. It is suggested that the employment of a group process measure, such as the GES, would be a useful inclusion to any outcome evaluation of treatment programs.

Key Words

group process group therapy sexual offender therapy sexual offending 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barker, M., & Beech, A. R. (1993). Sex offender treatment programs: A critical look at the cognitive-behavioral approach.Issues in Criminological and Legal Psychology, 19, 37–42.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, M., & Morgan, R. (1993).Sex offenders: A framework of community-based treatment. London: Home Office Publications Unit.Google Scholar
  3. Beckett, R. C., Beech, A. R., Fisher, D., & Fordham, A. S. (1994).Community-based treatment for sex offenders. An evaluation of seven treatment programs. London: Home Office Publications Unit.Google Scholar
  4. Beech, A. R., Beckett, R. C., & Fisher, D. (1997). Assessing treatment effectiveness in a child molester sample.Psychology, Crime and the Law (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Behroozi, C. S. (1992). Groupwork with involuntary clients: Remotivating strategies.Groupwork, 5, 31–41.Google Scholar
  6. Belfer, P. L., & Levendusky, L. (1985). Long-term behavioral group psychotherapy. An integrative model. In D. Upper & S. Ross (Eds.),Handbook of behavioral group therapy. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  7. Braaten L. J. (1989). Predicting positive goal attainment and symptom reduction from early group climate dimensions.International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 39, 377–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, P., & Erooga, M. (1994). Groupwork with men who sexually abuse children. In T. Morrison, M. Erooga, & R. C. Beckett (Eds.),Sexual Offenders Against Children: Practice, Management and Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Couch, D. R., & Childers, J. H. (1987). Leadership strategies for instilling and maintaining hope in group counselling.Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 12, 139–143.Google Scholar
  10. Erooga, M., Clark, P., & Bentley, M. (1990). Protection, control and treatment: Groupwork with child sexual abuse perpetrators.Groupwork, 3, 172–190.Google Scholar
  11. Hollin, C. R. (1995). The meaning and implications of “programme integrity”. In J. McGuire (Ed.),What works Reducing reoffending. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Karterud, S. (1988). The influence of task definition, leadership and therapeutic style on impatient group cultures.International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, 9, 231–247.Google Scholar
  13. Korda, L. J., & Pancrazio, J. J. (1989). Limiting negative outcome on group practice.Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 14, 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MacKenzie, H. R., & Livesley, W. J. (1986). Outcome and process measures in brief group psychotherapy.Psychiatric Annals 16, 715–720.Google Scholar
  15. Marshall, W. L., Ward, T., Jones, R., Johnston, P., & Barbaree, H. E. (1991). An optimistic evaluation of treatmen toutcome with sex offenders.Violence Update, 1, 8–11.Google Scholar
  16. Moos, R. H. (1986).Group environment scale manual. (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  17. Nichols, M. P., & Taylor, T. Y. (1975). Impact of therapist interventions on early sessions of group therapy.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 31, 726–729.Google Scholar
  18. Pekarik, G. P., & Finney-Owen, K. (1987). Outpatient clinic therapist attitudes and beliefs relevant to client dropout.Community Mental Health Journal, 23, 120–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stephenson, M. (1991). A summary of an evaluation of the community sex offender program in the pacific region.Forum on Corrections Research, 3, 25–30 (Correctional Service, Canada).Google Scholar
  20. Yalom, I. (1975).The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony Beech
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ann Scott Fordham
    • 3
  1. 1.Oxford Regional Forensic Service, Department of Foresnsic PsychologyFairmile HospitalWallingfordU.K.
  2. 2.The University of BirminghamBirminghamU.K.
  3. 3.Merseyside Regional Forensic PsychiatryLiverpoolU.K.

Personalised recommendations