The non-cubic lattice of rapidly quenched packet martensite
- 74 Downloads
- 10 Citations
Abstract
The positions of 200, 020 and 002 peaks of ferrous martensite have been measured individually by a precision X-ray diffractometer technique. Martensite with 18 wt pct Ni and 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 wt pct C was formed by salt-water quenching from preoriented austenite single-crystal slices about 0.5 mm thick. The variations in X-ray peak positions interpreted as changes in lattice parameter yield to the first approximation:Δa/a 0 = −0.005 [wt pct C],Δb/a 0 = −0.016 [wt pct C],Δc/a 0 = −0.037 [wt pct C] for carbon contents between 0.1 and 0.4. For such carbon contents the martensite has packet or mixed packet-lenticular morphology; consequently packet martensite is not cubic as sometimes claimed. Instead its lattice is nearly like that of lenticular martensite with the"a " and"c " parameters varying with carbon content as previously observed for tetragonal martensite, and the" b " parameter unequal to the" a" . The significance of the inequality of the" a " and" b " parameters is unclear, but that inequality appears to be characteristic of some plate and lenticular martensite.
Keywords
Austenite Martensite Metallurgical Transaction Axial Ratio Packet MartensitePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
ReferencesReferences
- 1.C. L. Magee and R. G. Davies:Acta Met., 1971, vol. 19, pp. 345–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.W. S. Owen, E. A. Wilson, and T. Bell:High Strength Materials, Zackay, ed., pp. 167–212, John Wiley, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
- 3.G. Kurdjumov and L. Lysak:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1947, vol. 156, pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
- 4.F. E. Werner, B. L. Averbach, and M. Cohen:Trans. ASM, 1956, vol. 49, pp. 823–41.Google Scholar
- 5.P. G. Winchell and M. Cohen:Trans. ASM, 1962, vol. 55, pp. 347–61.Google Scholar
- 6.L. I. Lysak, YA. N. Vovk, A. G. Drachinskaya, and Yu. M. Polishchuk:Fiz. Metal, metalloved., 1967, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 299–304.Google Scholar
- 7.A. J. Heckler and P. G. Winchell:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1963, vol. 227, pp. 732–36.Google Scholar
- 8.T. Wada, H. Wada, J. F. Elliott, and J. Chipman:Met. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 2199–2208.Google Scholar
- 9.W. B. Pearson:A Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structures of Metals and Alloys, vol. 1, pp. 625, Pergamon Press, N. Y., 1958.Google Scholar
- 10.L. Zwell, D. E. Carnahan, and G. R. Speich:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 1007–09.Google Scholar
- 11.C. S. Roberts:Trans. AIME, 1953, vol. 197, pp. 203–04.Google Scholar
- 12.J. G. van der Laan, P. F. Willemse, and J. A. Klostermann:Scr. Met., 1973, vol. 7, pp. 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.P. G. Winchell and G. R. Speich:Acta Met., 1970, vol. 18, pp. 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.J. W. Cahn and W. Rosenberg:Scr. Met., 1971, vol. 5, pp. 101–03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.G. Hausch and H. Warlimot:Acta Met., 1973, vol. 21, pp. 401–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.A. M. Sherman and M. Cohen:Scr. Met., 1973, vol. 7, pp. 651–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar