Metallurgical Transactions A

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 59–63 | Cite as

The non-cubic lattice of rapidly quenched packet martensite

  • A. K. Sachdev
  • P. G. Winchell
Alloy Phases and Structure

Abstract

The positions of 200, 020 and 002 peaks of ferrous martensite have been measured individually by a precision X-ray diffractometer technique. Martensite with 18 wt pct Ni and 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 wt pct C was formed by salt-water quenching from preoriented austenite single-crystal slices about 0.5 mm thick. The variations in X-ray peak positions interpreted as changes in lattice parameter yield to the first approximation:Δa/a 0 = −0.005 [wt pct C],Δb/a 0 = −0.016 [wt pct C],Δc/a 0 = −0.037 [wt pct C] for carbon contents between 0.1 and 0.4. For such carbon contents the martensite has packet or mixed packet-lenticular morphology; consequently packet martensite is not cubic as sometimes claimed. Instead its lattice is nearly like that of lenticular martensite with the"a " and"c " parameters varying with carbon content as previously observed for tetragonal martensite, and the" b " parameter unequal to the" a" . The significance of the inequality of the" a " and" b " parameters is unclear, but that inequality appears to be characteristic of some plate and lenticular martensite.

Keywords

Austenite Martensite Metallurgical Transaction Axial Ratio Packet Martensite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

ReferencesReferences

  1. 1.
    C. L. Magee and R. G. Davies:Acta Met., 1971, vol. 19, pp. 345–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. S. Owen, E. A. Wilson, and T. Bell:High Strength Materials, Zackay, ed., pp. 167–212, John Wiley, New York, 1965.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Kurdjumov and L. Lysak:J. Iron Steel Inst., 1947, vol. 156, pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    F. E. Werner, B. L. Averbach, and M. Cohen:Trans. ASM, 1956, vol. 49, pp. 823–41.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. G. Winchell and M. Cohen:Trans. ASM, 1962, vol. 55, pp. 347–61.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. I. Lysak, YA. N. Vovk, A. G. Drachinskaya, and Yu. M. Polishchuk:Fiz. Metal, metalloved., 1967, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 299–304.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. J. Heckler and P. G. Winchell:Trans. TMS-AIME, 1963, vol. 227, pp. 732–36.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Wada, H. Wada, J. F. Elliott, and J. Chipman:Met. Trans., 1971, vol. 2, pp. 2199–2208.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. B. Pearson:A Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structures of Metals and Alloys, vol. 1, pp. 625, Pergamon Press, N. Y., 1958.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Zwell, D. E. Carnahan, and G. R. Speich:Met. Trans., 1970, vol. 1, pp. 1007–09.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. S. Roberts:Trans. AIME, 1953, vol. 197, pp. 203–04.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. G. van der Laan, P. F. Willemse, and J. A. Klostermann:Scr. Met., 1973, vol. 7, pp. 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. G. Winchell and G. R. Speich:Acta Met., 1970, vol. 18, pp. 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. W. Cahn and W. Rosenberg:Scr. Met., 1971, vol. 5, pp. 101–03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Hausch and H. Warlimot:Acta Met., 1973, vol. 21, pp. 401–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. M. Sherman and M. Cohen:Scr. Met., 1973, vol. 7, pp. 651–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society for Metals, The Melallurgical Society of AIME 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. Sachdev
    • 1
  • P. G. Winchell
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Metallurgy and Materials ScienceMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge
  2. 2.Purdue UniversityWest Lafayette

Personalised recommendations